A Phase 2 interventional study of LADR Treatment in Hepatitis C, sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2013-04-23.
Sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to learn if pre-liver transplant treatment, using peginterferon plus ribavirin, will clear hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA from the blood in HCV-infected recipients and reduce the risk of recurrent HCV and allograft hepatitis following liver transplant.
Patients awaiting deceased donor liver transplant will be asked to enroll in this protocol at the time of identification of a potential living liver donor (see note note at end of description). Patients randomized to treatment arm will be encouraged to delay living donor liver transplant (LDLT) until they have received 12 weeks of treatment to allow for a treatment response, if any, to occur. The pros and cons of immediate versus delayed LDLT will be discussed with each patient; the timing of LDLT for patients randomized to no treatment will be determined by clinical need. There will be separate treatment strategies depending upon HCV genotype. Preliminary data and experience strongly suggests that interferon-based treatment clears HCV RNA in the majority of patients with genotypes 2 and 3, even at lower than standard doses (79% on-treatment response and 50% SVR). In contrast, clearance rates for genotype 1 patients with advanced cirrhosis may only be 28% on-treatment with an 11% SVR. In addition, treatment may be associated with significant side effects, intolerance, and increased risk of complications of liver disease. The HCV Committee for A2ALL strongly agreed that monitoring safety of pre-transplant antiviral therapy was essential and advised inclusion of an untreated control group. For these reasons, all patients with HCV, genotypes 1, 4, 5, \& 6 infection will be randomized 2:1 to either treatment or control (no treatment). Randomization will be web-based to avoid prior knowledge of treatment assignment at any site. In contrast to the randomized design for patients with genotypes 1, 4, 5, and 6, all patients with genotypes 2 and 3 HCV will receive treatment. All genotypes will be included in the analysis of safety, tolerance, and complications occurring during pre-transplant treatment.
Treatment is continued up to the time of LDLT or deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT), or to a maximum of 48 weeks of continuous treatment. Both peginterferon and ribavirin will be stopped if transplantation is expected to occur within 24 hours. Patients whose liver disease stabilize and are no longer in need of a liver transplant will complete a full 48 weeks of treatment with the aim of achieving SVR. These patients will be followed by measurement of HCV RNA, biochemical tests, hematology, and clinical evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment. If relapse occurs when treatment is discontinued after 48 weeks of therapy, institution of retreatment will be at the discretion of the investigator.
Deferral of LDLT while antiviral therapy is continued will be considered in patients who have undetectable HCV RNA, tolerate treatment well, lack evidence of HCC or ongoing hepatic decompensation, and have had stabilization or improvement in clinical or biochemical measures of liver disease: Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores. These patients should lack uncontrolled or ongoing bleeding from portal hypertension, ascites, systolic blood pressure (SBP), or encephalopathy. The decision to defer transplantation and to continue antiviral therapy will be made at the transplant center by the clinical investigator in consultation with the patient.
Based upon the kinetics of early virologic response in the peginterferon + ribavirin clinical trials, the researchers anticipate that a minimum of 12 weeks treatment is necessary to achieve a virologic response. However, the optimum duration of pre-transplant antiviral therapy that yields the highest rates of prevention of post-transplant HCV recurrence is unknown. Prolongation of antiviral therapy beyond 12 weeks may be advantageous in this regard, but prolonged therapy may also increase the risk of development of intercurrent complications of liver disease or side effects of treatment. In addition, patients with stable liver disease who achieve virologic remission may experience hepatic improvement and avoid transplantation.
All patients, treated and untreated controls will be followed and tested at the same intervals unless specified. Unscheduled visits and additional tests may be performed if clinically indicated, the findings at these visits and results of additional tests will be recorded in the database. The following details the schedule of visits and the tests/procedures to be performed at each visit:
Baseline
Week 0 (Randomization and/or Treatment Start)
After randomization
Post-LT (LDLT or DDLT) Follow-up
Follow-up of Patients completing 48 weeks of Treatment without Transplantation
NOTE: As a result of LADR Protocol Amendment III, patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and tumor stage T2 awaiting DDLT are now eligible to participate in the LADR study. The following inclusion criteria was added:
HCC DDLT candidates will not have their transplant delayed if a liver becomes available even if they have not completed 12 weeks of Rx.
2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Hepatitis C; 101 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 79 is close to the median of 79 across 1,660 interventional studies indexed under Hepatitis C.
Browse Hepatitis C studies →National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) is the lead sponsor of 537 studies on the registry; 54 are open to participants now.
Of its 80 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 51 (64%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects randomized to low accelerating dose regimen (LADR) treatment
Drug: LADR Treatment
Subjects randomized to Standard Care group, Genotypes 1,4,6
Subjects randomized to low accelerating dose regimen (LADR) treatment.
Drug: LADR Treatment
PEG-Intron (peginterferon alfa-2b (PEGIFN)) Redipen; Rebetol (ribavirin (RBV) United States Pharmacopeia (USP)) Capsules: Treatment was initiated with PEGIFN 0.75 µg/kg/week and RBV 600 mg/day. Dose escalations were performed at weeks 1 (PEGIFN 1.5 µg/kg/week and RBV 800 mg/day), 2 (RBV 1.0 g/day), and 3 (RBV 1.2 g/day for patients who weighed more then 75 kg) based upon patient tolerance and weekly blood counts. Once a patient reached the target RBV dose of 1-1.2 g/day (approximately 10.6 to 13.2 mg/kg/day), no further increases in RBV dose were made. Subsequent doses of PEGIFN and RBV were adjusted based upon adverse events, patient tolerability, and blood counts. If the highest tolerated dose of PEGIFN was \<0.5 ug/kg, PEGIFN was permanently discontinued.
Also known as: PEG-Intron; Rebetol, Low Accelerated Dosing Regimen
Patients Who Are Negative for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at 3 Months Post-transplant: Intent-to-Treat Analysis (ITT)
Post-transplant virologic response (pTVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 after liver transplantation.
Time frame: 3 months post-transplant
Patients Who Are Negative for HCV RNA at 3 Months Post-transplant: Per-Protocol Analysis (PP)
Post-transplant virologic response (pTVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 after liver transplantation, analysed among patients who received treatment.
Time frame: 3 months post-transplant
Patients With Combined Virologic Response (CVR): Intent-to-Treat Analyses (ITT)
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analyses of all patients. Combined Virologic Response (CVR), which includes both sustained virologic response pre-transplant (SVR) and post-transplant virologic response (pTVR)
Time frame: Pre-transplant and 3 months post-transplant
Patients With Combined Virologic Response (CVR): Per-Protocol Analysis (PP)
Per-Protocol (PP) analyses of all patients. Combined Virologic Response (CVR)includes both sustained virologic response pre-transplant (SVR) and post-transplant virologic response (pTVR), analysed among patients who received treatment.
Time frame: Pre-transplant and 3 months post-transplant
Persons were enrolled from October 2005 to January 2009, and followed through December 2009. Patients were enrolled at 7 clinical transplant centers in the United States.
| Milestone | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 2 or 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 16 | 31 | 32 |
| Completed | 16 | 31 | 32 |
| Not completed | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Post-transplant virologic response (pTVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 after liver transplantation.
| participants | Standard Care Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 2, 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Are Negative for Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) RNA at 3 Months Post-transplant: Intent-to-Treat Analysis (ITT) | 0 (0 to —) | 5 (0.07 to 0.42) | 6 (0.11 to 0.50) |
Intent-to-Treat (ITT) analyses of all patients. Combined Virologic Response (CVR), which includes both sustained virologic response pre-transplant (SVR) and post-transplant virologic response (pTVR)
| participants | Standard Care Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 2, 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Combined Virologic Response (CVR): Intent-to-Treat Analyses (ITT) | 1 | 6 | 6 |
Post-transplant virologic response (pTVR) defined as undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 after liver transplantation, analysed among patients who received treatment.
| participants | Standard Care Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 2, 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients Who Are Negative for HCV RNA at 3 Months Post-transplant: Per-Protocol Analysis (PP) | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Per-Protocol (PP) analyses of all patients. Combined Virologic Response (CVR)includes both sustained virologic response pre-transplant (SVR) and post-transplant virologic response (pTVR), analysed among patients who received treatment.
| participants | Standard Care Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment Group: Genotypes 2, 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients With Combined Virologic Response (CVR): Per-Protocol Analysis (PP) | 0 | 7 | 6 |
Collected over Serious Adverse Events (SAE) were collected pre-transplant, and through 1 year post-transplant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | — | 11/20 (55%) | — |
| LADR Treatment (All Genotypes) | — | 40/59 (67.8%) | — |
| Event | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment (All Genotypes) |
|---|---|---|
| Post-LT (30 days-1 year) InfectionInfections and infestations | 3/13 | 7/44 |
| Post-LT (30 days-1 year) OtherGeneral disorders | 2/13 | 10/44 |
| Pre-LT OtherGeneral disorders | 1/20 | 10/59 |
| DeathGeneral disorders | 2/20 | 9/59 |
| Pre-LT Liver-relatedHepatobiliary disorders | 3/20 | 6/59 |
| Post-LT (first 30 days) OtherGeneral disorders | 1/13 | 6/44 |
| Post-LT (30 days-1 year) Surgical complicationSurgical and medical procedures | 0/13 | 6/44 |
| Pre-LT CytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 0/20 | 8/59 |
| Post-LT (first 30 days) Liver-relatedHepatobiliary disorders | 1/13 | 3/44 |
| Post-LT (30 days-1 year) CytopeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders | 1/13 | 0/44 |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 2 or 3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 15 | 30 | 27 | 72 |
| >=65 years | 1 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Age Continuous(years) | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 2 or 3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 56.1 ± 5.4 | 54.6 ± 7.4 | 56.6 ± 6.5 | 55.7 ± 6.7 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 2 or 3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 3 | 10 | 7 | 20 |
| Male | 13 | 21 | 25 | 59 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | Standard Clinical Care: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 1, 4, 6 | LADR Treatment: Genotypes 2 or 3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 31 | 32 | 79 |
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2013. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) →