ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00134433Updated Jun 21, 2012

Endothelial Modulation for Angiogenic Therapy

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of intramyocardial VEGF angiogenesis (at a dose of 2 mg) and oral L-arginine supplementation (at a dose of 6 g/day) in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2012-06-21.

Sponsored by Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Coronary artery disease is the single most important killer of Canadians. Despite major advances in therapy, there is still a significant proportion of patients identified with the disease who die of it because current treatment approaches cannot effectively palliate their condition. A new treatment modality called therapeutic angiogenesis has appeared on the clinical research scene during the last five years; this approach recreates the natural processes of new blood vessel formation that is observed during growth and development in every human being. It is an extremely potent and promising modality, but so far the results of clinical trials in patients have been equivocal.

One reason for the limited efficacy observed thus far with therapeutic angiogenesis may rest in that factors produced by the lining of the coronary arteries themselves are essential for angiogenic substances to take effect in the heart muscle of patients with severe coronary artery disease. These same patients, however, virtually all have, as a result of their disease, marked dysfunction of their coronaries and therefore fail to produce these factors in adequate quantities. This hypothesis has been verified with extensive animal data by the investigators of this research, where a swine model of coronary disease was shown to severely inhibit the action of angiogenic growth factors. If one wants angiogenesis to work, a means of improving the function of the coronary lining of patients with severe ischemic heart disease must be identified and its effects evaluated in order to allow for angiogenic substances to exert their action towards successful revascularization of the heart muscle.

An amino acid called L-arginine has repeatedly been shown to markedly improve function of the coronary artery lining in patients with ischemic heart disease when administered regularly over a period of several months. This research will therefore test, in the form of a randomized clinical trial, whether this concomitant approach can make angiogenesis effective in patients with advanced coronary disease, by allowing for the action of growth factors to take place in the heart. If this approach is successful, as is anticipated, angiogenesis will constitute an effective modality for the treatment of coronary artery disease, not only in patients with advanced, severe involvement unamenable to any other form of cardiac therapy such as coronary artery bypass grafting, but even perhaps in all patients with coronary artery disease in need of revascularization. The goal of this investigation towards the making of a new, revolutionary, safe and efficacious modality for the treatment of the number one killer disease of Canadians is in complete agreement with the primary objective of the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada.

Read the detailed description

The EMAT trial tests the hypothesis that the concomitant treatment of chronic endothelial dysfunction in patients undergoing angiogenic therapy can make angiogenesis clinically effective. This is achieved with a 2x2 factorial, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of intramyocardial vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) angiogenesis at a dose of 2 mg and of adjunct endothelial modulation therapy using oral L-arginine supplementation at a dose of 6 g/day in patients undergoing surgical perivascular angiogenic therapy. The study involves surgical angiogenesis techniques similar to those previously used and reported to be clinically safe by the principal investigator and collaborators. Patients with a diffusely disease left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery have this artery grafted with an internal thoracic artery in either its proximal or distal portion (according to what is felt by the surgeon to be most optimal as per usual practice). The segment of the LAD that is not directly bypassed (i.e. either the proximal portion if a distal bypass is performed by the surgeon or the distal portion if a proximal bypass is performed) is treated by the surgeon with VEGF angiogenesis or placebo injections. Other coronary arteries in need of bypass grafting are grafted as per usual practice, using arterial grafts. Patients are therefore randomized to one of four groups at the time of coronary artery bypass grafting:

  • growth factor (VEGF) angiogenesis along the diffusely diseased, non-directly bypassed LAD segment + L-arginine oral supplementation;
  • placebo "angiogenesis" along the diffusely diseased, non-directly bypassed LAD segment + L-arginine oral supplementation;
  • growth factor (VEGF) angiogenesis along the diffusely diseased, non-directly bypassed LAD segment + placebo oral supplementation; and
  • placebo "angiogenesis" along the diffusely diseased, non-directly bypassed LAD segment + placebo oral supplementation.

The angiogenesis treatment consists either of the injection of 2 mg (divided in 10 injections of 200 μg each) of plasmid DNA encoding for the VEGF165 gene or of 10 x 1 ml injections of a sterile physiologic saline solution in the myocardial territory and septum along the diffusely diseased, non-directly bypassed LAD segment. Other myocardial territories are concomitantly revascularized with arterial coronary bypass grafts.

The EMAT trial's primary end-points relate to objective myocardial perfusion indices and contractility of the intervened anterior myocardial portion, respectively measured with cardiac positron-emission tomography (PET) by using the investigational radioisotope 13-N ammonia, and by RNA or echocardiography. Using 13-N PET, collateral-dependent blood flow and ischemic zone size are measured in a double-blind fashion by a single observer at baseline and at 3 months. To better delineate the actual effects of angiogenic therapy, baseline perfusion scans are obtained 3 to 5 days after the operative procedure in order to account for the potentially confounding effect of CABG on myocardial perfusion to the proximal and distal anterior and septal territories. The functional, secondary end-points of the EMAT trial consist of clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), freedom from angina, and angina class.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Coronary Artery Disease, Diffuse
  • Coronary Artery Disease, Deemed Inoperable
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,676 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 958 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 123 across 3,481 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation is the lead sponsor of 181 studies on the registry; 41 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Severe chronic angina
  • Multi-vessel coronary artery disease
  • Diffusely diseased left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD)
  • At least 18 years of age at the time of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy, lactation, or any child-bearing potential
  • Patients who are candidates for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) or stenting
  • Severe left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction \< 30%)
  • Threatened proximal coronary occlusion or unstable angina
  • Recent myocardial infarction (\< 1 month)
  • Chronic renal failure (serum creatinine > 130 µmol/L)
  • Hepatic insufficiency (Child-Pugh Class C)
  • Clinically significant valvular heart disease
  • Personal history of neoplasia
  • Abnormal serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), bowel neoplasia screening questionnaire, or updated mammography report (if female) - any test not performed within the last 6 months will be conducted prior to confirmation of eligibility
  • Family history of cancer (i.e. ≥ 2 first-degree relatives)
  • History of diabetic retinopathy
  • Latent herpes infection
  • Schizophrenia
  • Claustrophobia
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Interventions

  • Geneticintramyocardial VEGF angiogenesis (at a dose of 2 mg)
  • Drugoral L-arginine supplementation (at a dose of 6 g/day)
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Blood flow to ischemic zone at 6 months compared to baseline: Persantine Ammonia Perfusion PET done at baseline prior to discharge from hospital and repeated at 3 months post intervention

  2. Echocardiogram done at baseline prior to discharge from hospital and repeated at 3 months post intervention

  3. Freedom from angina recurrence: Study participant interview and Seattle Angina Questionnaire administered (3 months, 6 months, 1 year). Results compared from preoperative baseline.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Division of Cardiac Surgery, University of Ottawa Heart Institute
    Ottawa, Ontario K1Y 4W7, Canada
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Nov 2004, a primary completion of Mar 2007 and a completion of Oct 2007. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 22, 2005
First posted
Aug 24, 2005
Start
Nov 2004
Primary completionActual
Mar 2007
CompletionActual
Oct 2007
Last update
Jun 21, 2012
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 21, 2012, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00134433
Collaborators
Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario
Responsible party
Marc Ruel MD MPH FRCSC (Dr., Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2005
Start date
Nov 2004
Primary completion
Mar 2007
Completion
Oct 2007
Last update
Jun 21, 2012

Study contacts

Marc Ruel, MD MPH FRCSC
principal investigator · Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2012. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion