ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00124306IC01Updated Jan 12, 2026Results posted

Efficacy of Amitriptyline for Painful Bladder Syndrome (PBS)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Amitriptyline and Placebo in Bladder Diseases and Interstitial Cystitis, sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). Completed at 10 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-01-12.

Primary conditionCystitis, InterstitialRegistry: Urinary Bladder DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Urinary Bladder Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Cystitis, Interstitial
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Cystitis, Interstitial, a narrower term within Urinary Bladder Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
271
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized clinical trial study to test the efficacy and safety of amitriptyline in the treatment of patients newly diagnosed with painful bladder syndrome (PBS). PBS is defined by symptoms--frequent urination day and night and increasing pain as the bladder fills--according to the International Continence Society. The syndrome includes interstitial cystitis (IC), which has been estimated to affect as many as 700,000 people, mostly women. Estimates for PBS vary widely, but as many as 10 million people may suffer from this condition. Although amitriptyline is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication used for depression, the way it works makes it useful for treating the pain of fibromyalgia, multiple sclerosis, and other chronic pain syndromes. Prior small studies in interstitial cystitis (IC) suggested the drug may be a wise choice for this syndrome as well, because it blocks nerve signals that trigger pain and may also decrease muscle spasms in the bladder, helping to relieve the symptoms of pain and frequent urination.

Read the detailed description

The current trial is recruiting newly diagnosed adults who have not yet received treatment. Approximately 270 participants will be randomly assigned to take up to 75 milligrams of amitriptyline or a placebo each day for 14 to 26 weeks. All participants will be given techniques to practice suppressing the urge to urinate for increasingly longer stretches until they can wait 3 or 4 hours before going to the bathroom. Participants will also regulate when and how much they drink and avoid bladder irritants such as alcohol, acidic foods and carbonated or caffeinated drinks. Staff and patients will find out who received the amitriptyline when the study is finished. Medications and tests are free to participants.

Ten medical centers in the United States and Canada are recruiting adults newly diagnosed with either painful bladder syndrome (PBS) or interstitial cystitis (IC).The centers make up the Interstitial Cystitis Clinical Research Network, sponsored by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) at NIH.

02

Conditions studied

  • Bladder Diseases
  • Interstitial Cystitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • painful bladder syndrome
  • interstitial cystitis
  • newly diagnosed
03

In context

Cystitis, Interstitial Reclassified

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 271 is above the median of 51 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial.

Browse Cystitis, Interstitial studies →

Lead sponsor

National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) is the lead sponsor of 538 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Of its 80 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 51 (64%) have results posted.

Compared within Cystitis, Interstitial, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Urinary Bladder Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must report bladder pain/discomfort score of 3 or greater on a 0-10 Likert scale over the previous 4 weeks.
  • Participant must report a symptom score of abnormal urinary frequency of 3 or greater on a 0-10 Likert scale over the previous 4 weeks.
  • Symptoms of abnormal urinary frequency and bladder pain/discomfort must have been present for at least six weeks prior to screening visit.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or intolerance to amitriptyline or any of its components.
  • Currently receives treatment with amitriptyline or other tricyclic antidepressant, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), or monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitor antidepressants.
  • Previous treatment with amitriptyline or other tricyclics, hydroxyzine or other antihistamines for bladder symptoms; pentosanpolysulfate; DMSO or any other intravesical therapy, biofeedback or pelvic floor physical therapy for PBS symptoms
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
271 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    1 - Amitriptyline

    Amitryptiline, increased during a 6-week period from 10 mg up to 75 mg, taken once daily for a total of 12 weeks.

    Drug: Amitriptyline

  • Placebo comparator
    2 - Placebo

    Placebo will be dosed exactly as the active arm and taken once daily for a total of 12 weeks.

    Other: Placebo

Interventions

  • Amitriptyline will be titrated over a 6-week period as tolerated, to a maximum dose of 75mg. During the 6-week titration period, the patient who cannot tolerate a scheduled increased dose may adjust the medication dose for tolerance by tapering down one 25mg tablet.

    Also known as: Elavil

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo will be dosed exactly as active arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Global Response Assessment (GRA)

    The primary efficacy analysis was based on intent to treat, comparing the proportion of responders between treatment arms on a patient reported GRA recorded at 12 weeks or study withdrawal. The 7-point GRA queried, "As compared to when you started the current study, how would you rate your overall symptoms now?" The 7 response options were markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly improved, moderately improved and markedly improved. Participants who indicated that they were markedly or moderately improved were considered responders. Subjects who withdrew from the study for any reason and did not provide data on the primary outcome were considered treatment failures, and were included in the denominator for calculation of response rates.

    Time frame: 12 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks

    A number of secondary outcomes \[as detailed in the Baseline Measures section\] were assessed throughout the study. These outcomes include pain, urgency and frequency on 0 to 10-point Likert scales, a 24-hour voiding diary, the Health Status Questionnaire for Quality of Life (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Female Sexual Function Index or International Index of Erectile Function. When applicable, additional analyses of the symptom outcomes may include evaluation of secondary response rates defined by specific changes in symptoms. Associations between changes from baseline in secondary outcomes and GRA will be used to supplement the primary endpoint analysis, and to evaluate the validity of the symptom scales for assessing change.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 Weeks

  2. Change in Urinary Symptoms Measures

    The O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indices, and the University of Wisconsin Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory The IC Symptom Index is a 4-question survey w/ a severity scale from min.0(not at all) to max.5(always). The IC Problem Index is a 4-question survey with a severity scale ranging from min.0 (no problem) to max.4 (big problem). Higher subscale responses for each index indicate more severe symptoms. A sub-set of the University of Wisconsin Symptom Survey is designated as the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory w/ questions ranging from 0(not at all) to 6(a lot). Pts. reported symptoms the day of assessment. Scores ranged from 0 to 42. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Symptoms include: bladder pain; bladder discomfort; getting up at night to go to the bathroom; going to the bathroom frequently during the day; urgency to urinate; difficulty sleeping because of bladder problems; and burning sensation in the bladder.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Adherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)

    Adherence to protocol treatment, to study drug and EBMP, at 6 weeks was assessed in 4 categories of 1) symptom management, 2) fluid management, 3) diet modification and 4) bladder training. For each of these EBMP categories adherence was defined as the overall percentage of participants who reported adhering to each component of the EBMP at each telephone contact or clinic visit. Subjects were classified into 3 groups based on the maximum dose obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as shown in the Outcome Measure Data Table below.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Change in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks

    Baseline nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: "Did this void occur during your intended sleep period?" Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for "Yes" entries in response to this question.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 7, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
Started135136
Completed112119
Not completed2317
Withdrew: Adverse event72
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up106
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy36
Withdrew: Personal constraints02
Withdrew: Use of unacceptable medication10
Withdrew: Abnormal lab result01
Withdrew: Other20

Outcome measures

PrimaryGlobal Response Assessment (GRA)

The primary efficacy analysis was based on intent to treat, comparing the proportion of responders between treatment arms on a patient reported GRA recorded at 12 weeks or study withdrawal. The 7-point GRA queried, "As compared to when you started the current study, how would you rate your overall symptoms now?" The 7 response options were markedly worse, moderately worse, slightly worse, the same, slightly improved, moderately improved and markedly improved. Participants who indicated that they were markedly or moderately improved were considered responders. Subjects who withdrew from the study for any reason and did not provide data on the primary outcome were considered treatment failures, and were included in the denominator for calculation of response rates.

Time frame:
12 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Global Response Assessment (GRA)
Participants1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
Marked/moderate improvement7461
Slight improvement, same or worse6175
SecondaryChanges in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks

A number of secondary outcomes \[as detailed in the Baseline Measures section\] were assessed throughout the study. These outcomes include pain, urgency and frequency on 0 to 10-point Likert scales, a 24-hour voiding diary, the Health Status Questionnaire for Quality of Life (SF-36), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Female Sexual Function Index or International Index of Erectile Function. When applicable, additional analyses of the symptom outcomes may include evaluation of secondary response rates defined by specific changes in symptoms. Associations between changes from baseline in secondary outcomes and GRA will be used to supplement the primary endpoint analysis, and to evaluate the validity of the symptom scales for assessing change.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Changes in Quality of Life Measures From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Change in score baseline to 12 weeks1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
Pain score-2.6 ± 2.5-2.3 ± 2.4
Urgency-3.0 ± 2.5-2.5 ± 2.6
Frequency-3.5 ± 2.3-2.6 ± 2.5
24-Hr voiding frequency-4.4 ± 5.4-2.0 ± 3.9
SecondaryChange in Urinary Symptoms Measures

The O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom and Problem Indices, and the University of Wisconsin Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory The IC Symptom Index is a 4-question survey w/ a severity scale from min.0(not at all) to max.5(always). The IC Problem Index is a 4-question survey with a severity scale ranging from min.0 (no problem) to max.4 (big problem). Higher subscale responses for each index indicate more severe symptoms. A sub-set of the University of Wisconsin Symptom Survey is designated as the Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Inventory w/ questions ranging from 0(not at all) to 6(a lot). Pts. reported symptoms the day of assessment. Scores ranged from 0 to 42. A higher score indicates more severe symptoms. Symptoms include: bladder pain; bladder discomfort; getting up at night to go to the bathroom; going to the bathroom frequently during the day; urgency to urinate; difficulty sleeping because of bladder problems; and burning sensation in the bladder.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Change in score baseline to 12 weeks
Change in Urinary Symptoms Measures
Change in score baseline to 12 weeks1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
IC Symptom Index-4.8 ± 3.7-3.3 ± 3.9
IC Problem Index-5.2 ± 3.9-3.9 ± 4.0
Wisconsin Symptom Survey-13.1 ± 10.2-9.3 ± 9.3
Statistical analysis
  • 1 - Active Comparator vs 2 - Placebo Comparator · Mean difference (net): -1.5 · 95% CI -2.5 to -0.5
  • 1 - Active Comparator vs 2 - Placebo Comparator · Mean difference (net): -1.2 · 95% CI -2.3 to -0.2
  • 1 - Active Comparator vs 2 - Placebo Comparator · Mean difference (net): -3.8 · 95% CI -6.3 to -1.3
SecondaryAdherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)

Adherence to protocol treatment, to study drug and EBMP, at 6 weeks was assessed in 4 categories of 1) symptom management, 2) fluid management, 3) diet modification and 4) bladder training. For each of these EBMP categories adherence was defined as the overall percentage of participants who reported adhering to each component of the EBMP at each telephone contact or clinic visit. Subjects were classified into 3 groups based on the maximum dose obtained at 6 and 12 weeks as shown in the Outcome Measure Data Table below.

Time frame:
12 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Adherence to Study Drug and Urinary Educational/Behavioral Program (EBMP Educational/Behavioral Modification Program)
Participants1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
50 mg or > achieved/maintained @ 12 wks6298
50 mg or > achieved, reduced < 50 by 12 wks2720
50 mg or greater not achieved4618
SecondaryChange in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks

Baseline nighttime \[sleep period\] voiding frequency was collected by participant report on a Voiding Diary with entries for each void in a 24-hour period. Each void entry included the question: "Did this void occur during your intended sleep period?" Responses: 1=Yes, 0=No. The sum was totaled for "Yes" entries in response to this question.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Change in voiding events
Change in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks
Change in voiding events1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo Comparator
Change in Nighttime Voiding From Baseline to 12 Weeks-0.9 ± 2.4-0.9 ± 2.4

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
1 - Amitriptyline0/135 (0%)2/135 (1.5%)119/135 (88.1%)
2 - Placebo0/136 (0%)3/136 (2.2%)98/136 (72.1%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
Event1 - Amitriptyline2 - Placebo
Invasive transitional cell carcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/1350/136
HypothyroidismEndocrine disorders1/1350/136
Mass found on chest x-rayRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1351/136
Sudden onset of nausea, abdominal pain, SOB, subscapular pain w/left arm radiationCardiac disorders0/1351/136
Diagnosed with prostate cancerRenal and urinary disorders0/1351/136
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
Event1 - Amitriptyline2 - Placebo
Constitutional symptomsGeneral disorders61/13542/136
GastrointestinalGeneral disorders57/13532/136
PainNervous system disorders43/13548/136
NeurologicalEar and labyrinth disorders45/13529/136
GenitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders22/13510/136
PulmonaryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders15/13513/136
Infection, feverInfections and infestations9/13514/136
Dermatology/skinSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders9/13510/136
MusculokeletalMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/1353/136
Ocular, visualEye disorders3/1357/136

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Mean38.0 ± 13.839.9 ± 14.039.0 ± 13.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Female115111226
Male202545
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American181533
White96104200
More than one race211738
Unknown or Not Reported000
Participants ever diagnosed with IC/PBS
Participants ever diagnosed with IC/PBS(Participants)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Count of participants6275137
Pain score
Pain score(units on a scale)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Mean5.8 ± 1.56.0 ± 1.85.9 ± 1.7
Urgency score
Urgency score(units on a scale)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Mean6.4 ± 1.86.4 ± 1.86.4 ± 1.8
Frequency score
Frequency score(units on a scale)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Mean6.8 ± 1.76.8 ± 1.86.8 ± 1.8
24-Hr voiding frequency
24-Hr voiding frequency(Voiding events)1 - Active Comparator2 - Placebo ComparatorTotal
Mean13.9 ± 5.213.7 ± 5.713.8 ± 5.5

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

10 sites
  • Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • Loyola University Medical Center
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinic
    Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
  • University of Maryland
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Henry Ford Hospital
    Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States
  • William Beaumont Hospital
    Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, United States
  • University of Rochester Medical Center
    Rochester, New York 14642, United States
  • University of Pennsylvania
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
  • University of Washington
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Queen's University
    Kingston, Ontario K7L 2Y7, Canada
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Foster HE Jr, Hanno PM, Nickel JC, Payne CK, Mayer RD, Burks DA, Yang CC, Chai TC, Kreder KJ, Peters KM, Lukacz ES, FitzGerald MP, Cen L, Landis JR, Propert KJ, Yang W, Kusek JW, Nyberg LM; Interstitial Cystitis Collaborative Research Network. Effect of amitriptyline on symptoms in treatment naive patients with interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome. J Urol. 2010 May;183(5):1853-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.12.106. Epub 2010 Mar 29. PubMed 20303115 ↗
  • Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2. PubMed 32734597 ↗
10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2005, a primary completion of Apr 2008 and a completion of Dec 2008. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Oct 2025, 17 years 6 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 13, 2005
First posted
Jul 27, 2005
Start
Feb 2005
Primary completionActual
Apr 2008
CompletionActual
Dec 2008
Results first posted
Oct 7, 2025
Last update
Jan 12, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00124306
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 27, 2005
Start date
Feb 2005
Primary completion
Apr 2008
Completion
Dec 2008
Results posted
Oct 7, 2025
Last update
Jan 12, 2026

Study contacts

Leroy M. Nyberg, Jr., Ph.D, M.D.
study director · National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Amitriptyline

Start the discussion