An observational study in Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases and Diabetes Mellitus, Non-insulin Dependent, sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina. Completed. Open to participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-15.
Sponsored by Medical University of South Carolina · Observational
To investigate the relationship between dietary fiber and cardiovascular inflammatory markers.
BACKGROUND:
Recent studies have found that diets with higher fiber intake are associated with a reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the association does not prove that dietary fiber is actually responsible for lower CVD risk nor does it illuminate potential mechanisms of lower risk if present. Since the diet-CVD connection is strong, and given that CVD is a major contributor to morbidity and mortality, additional information would be valuable. Our preliminary studies and the work of others suggest that there is a significant association between C-reactive protein (CRP) and dietary fiber intake. These observations led us to the following unifying hypothesis: Diets high in fiber are associated with lower levels of inflammatory markers. Our long-term goal is to determine whether inflammation is a key mediator in the link between fiber intake and cardiovascular disease risk.
DESIGN NARRATIVE:
The three specific aims of the project are 1: To determine whether total dietary fiber and or fiber supplementation is associated with levels of inflammatory markers (CRP, fibrinogen, WBC) among adult participants with obesity, hypertension, or diabetes in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2000; 2: To determine whether 3 weeks on a diet naturally high in fiber (30g/day), or on a diet high in fiber through supplementation, will significantly reduce inflammatory markers compared to a diet low in fiber, in a clinical trial among 30 lean and 30 obese adult hypertensive volunteers; and 3: To determine whether 3 months on a diet supplemented with moderate fiber (extra 7g/day), or high fiber (15g/day), will significantly reduce inflammatory markers compared to a usual diet low in fiber (average 10-15g/day) in a three-month long clinical trial among 180 obese adult volunteers.
To accomplish these aims, three related studies will be conducted. The first will utilize existing data contained in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, a national database of 5773 non-institutionalized adults. The second study will be an additional procedure and laboratory examination to an existing R01 by one of the investigators, to examine the impact of a diet naturally high in fiber on CRP and other inflammatory markers. The third study will consist of new primary data collection in 180 volunteers to evaluate the effect of different levels of fiber supplementation on CRP, fibrinogen, WBC, and interleukin-6. By using existing data, taking advantage of an ongoing protocol, and adding new information through primary data collection, the investigators hope to dramatically increase their understanding of the association between dietary fiber and cardiovascular inflammatory markers. This information could serve to guide constructive changes in nutritional guidelines for reducing CVD risk for millions of at-risk individuals.
4,904 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 919 are open to participants now.
Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →Medical University of South Carolina is the lead sponsor of 852 studies on the registry; 165 are open to participants now.
Of its 128 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 101 (79%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
No eligibility criteria
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2008. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Medical University of South Carolina