CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00075478Updated May 15, 2017Results posted

Total-Body Irradiation With or Without Fludarabine Phosphate Followed By Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Hematologic Cancer

A Phase 3 interventional study of Total-Body Irradiation and Fludarabine Phosphate in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission and Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center. Completed at 10 sites in 3 countries. Open to participants aged Up to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-05-15.

Sponsored by Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
87
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized phase III trial is studying total-body irradiation (TBI) and fludarabine phosphate to see how it works compared with TBI alone followed by donor stem cell transplant in treating patients with hematologic cancer. Giving low doses of chemotherapy, such as fludarabine phosphate, and radiation therapy before a donor stem cell transplant helps stop the growth of cancer cells. It also stops the patient's immune system from rejecting the donor's stem cells. The donated stem cells may replace the patient's immune system cells and help destroy any remaining cancer cells (graft-versus-tumor effect). Sometimes the transplanted cells from a donor can also make an immune response against the body's normal cells. Giving cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil after transplant may stop this from happening. It is not yet known whether TBI followed by donor stem cell transplant is more effective with or without fludarabine phosphate in treating hematologic cancer.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare overall survival at 3 years after conditioning with 200 cGy TBI alone vs. fludarabine (fludarabine phosphate)/200 cGy TBI in heavily pretreated patients with hematologic malignancies at low/moderate risk for graft rejection.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the non-relapse mortality 1-year after conditioning in patients who received TBI alone vs. fludarabine/TBI.

II. To compare the incidences of graft rejection in patients who received TBI alone vs. fludarabine/TBI.

III. To compare the incidences of grades II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and chronic extensive GVHD.

IV. To compare rates of disease progression and/or relapse-related mortality.

V. To compare the immune reconstitution and the risks of infections.

OUTLINE:

NONMYELOABLATIVE CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.

ARM I: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) on days -4 to -2. Patients then undergo low-dose TBI on day 0.

ARM II: Patients undergo low-dose TBI on day 0.

ALLOGENEIC PERIPHERAL BLOOD STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION (PBSCT): After TBI, patients undergo PBSCT on day 0.

IMMUNOSUPPRESSION: Patients receive cyclosporine orally (PO) twice daily (BID) on days -3 to 56 in the absence of GVHD. Patients with no evidence of GVHD at day 56 begin a cyclosporine taper and continue the taper until day 180. Patients with evidence of disease progression and no evidence of GVHD prior to day 56 receive tapered doses of cyclosporine for 2 weeks. Patients also receive mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) PO BID on days 0-28 in the absence of GVHD. If treatment for GVHD is required before day 28, MMF is continued until a steroid taper begins.

Patients are followed up periodically for 1.5 years and then annually for 5 years post-transplantation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission
  • Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Remission
  • Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Chronic Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia, BCR-ABL1 Positive
  • Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
  • Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm
  • Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Mantle Cell Lymphoma
  • Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
  • Plasma Cell Myeloma
  • Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
  • Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma
  • Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 87 is above the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center is the lead sponsor of 537 studies on the registry; 79 are open to participants now.

Of its 57 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 45 (79%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients must be not eligible for conventional allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and must have disease expected to be stable for at least 100 days without chemotherapy
  • An autograft immediately prior (less than 6 months) to nonmyeloablative HCT (tandem approach) is not permitted
  • Patients with hematologic malignancies treatable with HCT or with a B cell malignancy except those curable with autologous transplant will be included
  • Aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHLs) and other histologies such as diffuse large B cell NHL: patients are eligible IF they are not eligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), not eligible for conventional myeloablative HSCT, or have failed an autologous HSCT
  • Low grade NHL with \< 6 month duration of complete remission (CR) between courses of conventional therapy
  • Mantle cell NHL; may be treated in first CR
  • Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) must have either:

    • Failed to meet National Cancer Institute (NCI) Working Group criteria for complete or partial response after therapy with a regimen containing fludarabine phosphate (FLU) (or another nucleoside analog, e.g. cladribine [2-CDA], pentostatin) or experience disease relapse within 12 months after completing therapy with a regimen containing FLU (or another nucleoside analog)
    • Failed FLU-cyclophosphamide [CY]-rituximab (FCR) combination chemotherapy at any time point
    • Have "17p deletion" cytogenetic abnormality; patients should have received induction chemotherapy but could be transplanted in 1st CR
    • Or patients with a diagnosis of CLL (or small lymphocytic lymphoma) or diagnosis of CLL that progresses to prolymphocytic leukemia (PLL), or T-cell CLL or PLL
  • Hodgkin lymphoma (HL): must have received and failed frontline therapy; patients must have failed or were not eligible for autologous transplant
  • Multiple myeloma (MM): must have chemosensitive disease after failed autografting (an autografting immediately prior [within 6 months] to nonmyeloablative HCT [tandem approach] is not permitted)
  • Acute myeloid leukemia (AML): must have \< 5% marrow blasts at the time of transplant and be beyond first CR
  • Acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL): must have \< 5% marrow blasts at the time of transplant and be beyond first CR
  • Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML): patients will be accepted in chronic phase (CP) beyond CP1 if they have received previous myelosuppressive chemotherapy or HCT, \< 5% marrow blasts at time of transplant
  • Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS)/myeloproliferative disorders (MPD): must have received previous myelosuppressive chemotherapy or HCT, \< 5% marrow blasts at time of transplant
  • Waldenstroms Macroglobulinemia: must have failed 2 courses of therapy
  • Patients will not be allowed to receive myelosuppressive chemotherapy for three weeks prior to conditioning
  • Patients \< 12 years old must be approved by both the participating institutions' patient review committee such as the Patient Care Conference (PCC) at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC) and the FHCRC principal investigator
  • Patients who refused to be treated on a conventional HCT protocol; for this inclusion criterion, transplants must be approved by both the participating institution's patient review committee such as the Patient Care Conference (PCC) at the FHCRC and the FHCRC principal investigator
  • Patients with human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched related donors
  • DONOR: Related donor who is HLA genotypically identical at least at one haplotype and may be phenotypically or genotypically identical at the allele level at HLA-A, -B, -C, -DRB1, and -DQB1
  • DONOR: Donor must consent to filgrastim (G-CSF) administration and leukapheresis
  • DONOR: Donor must have adequate veins for leukapheresis or agree to placement of central venous catheter (femoral, subclavian)
  • DONOR: For females of child bearing age, serum pregnancy qualitative (PGSTAT) within 72 hours prior to initial dose of filgrastim (G-CSF); results must be available prior to filgrastim

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible for a high priority curative autologous transplant
  • Patients with rapidly progressive, aggressive NHL unless in minimal disease state
  • Patients with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia
  • Presence of circulating leukemic blasts (in the peripheral blood) detected by standard pathology for patients with AML, ALL or CML
  • Life expectancy severely limited by diseases other than malignancy
  • Any current central nervous system (CNS) involvement with disease refractory to intrathecal chemotherapy
  • Fertile men or women unwilling to use contraceptives during and for up to 12 months post treatment
  • Female patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive patients
  • Patients with active non-hematological malignancies (except localized non-melanoma skin malignancies)
  • Patients with a history of non-hematologic malignancies (except non-melanoma skin cancers) currently in a complete remission, who are less than 5 years from the time of complete remission, and have a > 20% risk of disease recurrence
  • Fungal infections with radiological progression after receipt of amphotericin formulation or mold-active azoles for greater than 1 month
  • Patients with active bacterial or fungal infections unresponsive to medical therapy
  • Karnofsky score \< 50 for adult patients
  • Lansky-Play performance score \< 50 for pediatric patients
  • The addition of cytotoxic agents for "cytoreduction" with the exception of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (imatinib mesylate), cytokine therapy, hydroxyurea, low dose cytarabine, chlorambucil, or rituxan will not be allowed within three weeks of the initiation of conditioning
  • Patients with the following organ dysfunction:

    • Symptomatic coronary artery disease or ejection fraction \< 35% or other cardiac failure requiring therapy (required for patients with history of cardiac disease or anthracycline use); ejection fraction is required if age > 50 years or there is a history of anthracycline exposure or history of cardiac disease
    • Poorly controlled hypertension on multiple antihypertensives
    • Pulmonary: diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) \< 30%, total lung capacity (TLC) \< 30%, forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) \< 30% and/or receiving supplementary continuous oxygen; the FHCRC study principal investigator (PI) must approve enrollment of all patients with pulmonary nodules
    • Liver function abnormalities: patients with clinical or laboratory evidence of liver disease would be evaluated for the cause of liver disease, its clinical severity in terms of liver function, bridging fibrosis, and the degree of portal hypertension; patients will be excluded if they are found to have fulminant liver failure, cirrhosis of the liver with evidence of portal hypertension, alcoholic hepatitis, esophageal varices, a history of bleeding esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, uncorrectable hepatic synthetic dysfunction evinced by prolongation of the prothrombin time, ascites related to portal hypertension, bacterial or fungal liver abscess, biliary obstruction, chronic viral hepatitis with total serum bilirubin > 3 mg/dL, and symptomatic biliary disease
  • DONOR: Age less than 12 years
  • DONOR: Identical twin
  • DONOR: Pregnancy
  • DONOR: Infection with HIV
  • DONOR: Known allergy to filgrastim
  • DONOR: Current serious systemic illness that would result in increased risk for filgrastim mobilization and harvest of PBSC
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
87 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arm I (chemotherapy, TBI, transplant, GVHD prophylaxis)

    Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -4 to -2. Patients then undergo low-dose TBI on day 0. After TBI, patients undergo PBSCT on day 0. Patients receive cyclosporine PO BID on days -3 to 56 in the absence of GVHD. Patients with no evidence of GVHD at day 56 begin a cyclosporine taper and continue the taper until day 180. Patients with evidence of disease progression and no evidence of GVHD prior to day 56 receive tapered doses of cyclosporine for 2 weeks. Patients also receive MMF PO BID on days 0-28 in the absence of GVHD. If treatment for GVHD is required before day 28, MMF is continued until a steroid taper begins.

    Procedure: Total-Body Irradiation · Drug: Fludarabine Phosphate · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Drug: Cyclosporine · Procedure: Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

  • Active comparator
    Arm II (TBI, transplant, GVHD prophylaxis)

    Patients undergo low-dose TBI on day 0. After TBI, patients undergo PBSCT on day 0. Patients receive cyclosporine PO BID on days -3 to 56 in the absence of GVHD. Patients with no evidence of GVHD at day 56 begin a cyclosporine taper and continue the taper until day 180. Patients with evidence of disease progression and no evidence of GVHD prior to day 56 receive tapered doses of cyclosporine for 2 weeks. Patients also receive MMF PO BID on days 0-28 in the absence of GVHD. If treatment for GVHD is required before day 28, MMF is continued until a steroid taper begins.

    Procedure: Total-Body Irradiation · Drug: Mycophenolate Mofetil · Drug: Cyclosporine · Procedure: Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

Interventions

  • ProcedureTotal-Body Irradiation

    Undergo TBI

    Also known as: TBI, Total Body Irradiation, Whole-Body Irradiation

  • DrugFludarabine Phosphate

    Given IV

    Also known as: 2-F-ara-AMP, Beneflur, SH T 586

  • DrugMycophenolate Mofetil

    Given PO

    Also known as: Cellcept, MMF

  • DrugCyclosporine

    Given PO

    Also known as: 27-400, CsA, Neoral, OL 27-400, Sandimmun

  • ProcedurePeripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation

    Undergo transplantation

    Also known as: PBPC transplantation, Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cell Transplantation, Peripheral Stem Cell Support, Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival

    Percentage of patients surviving as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality

    Percentage of NRM as estimated by cumulative incidence methods with competing risks

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

  2. Incidence of Relapse/Progression

    Percentage of relapse estimated by cumulative incidence methods

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

  3. Incidence of Relapse-related Mortality

    Percentage of death following relapse/progression, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

  4. Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

    Percentage patients with grades II-IV GHVD, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

    Time frame: 120 days after transplant

  5. Incidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD

    Percentage patients with chronic extensive GVHD, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

  6. Incidence of Graft Rejection

    Donor CD3 chimerism less than 5%

    Time frame: 1 year after transplant

  7. Progression-free Survival

    Percentage of patients with progression-free survival, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

    Time frame: 3 years after transplant

07

Results

Posted May 19, 2014

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Started4245
Completed4144
Not completed11
Withdrew: Not eligible10
Withdrew: Physician decision01

Outcome measures

PrimaryOverall Survival

Percentage of patients surviving as estimated by Kaplan-Meier.

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Survival
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Overall Survival6554
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = .09 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.57 · 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1
SecondaryIncidence of Non-relapse Mortality

Percentage of NRM as estimated by cumulative incidence methods with competing risks

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Non-relapse Mortality7 (9 to 254)9 (98 to 287)
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.59 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.67 · 95% CI 0.1 to 3.0
SecondaryIncidence of Relapse/Progression

Percentage of relapse estimated by cumulative incidence methods

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Relapse/Progression
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Relapse/Progression4055
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.06 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.55 · 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0
SecondaryIncidence of Relapse-related Mortality

Percentage of death following relapse/progression, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Relapse-related Mortality
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Relapse-related Mortality2837
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.09 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.53 · 95% CI 0.3 to 1.1
SecondaryIncidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD

Percentage patients with grades II-IV GHVD, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

Time frame:
120 days after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Grades II-IV Acute GVHD4632
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.16 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.6 · 95% CI 0.8 to 3.1
SecondaryIncidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD

Percentage patients with chronic extensive GVHD, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Incidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Chronic Extensive GVHD7248
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.14 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.52 · 95% CI 0.9 to 2.7
SecondaryIncidence of Graft Rejection

Donor CD3 chimerism less than 5%

Time frame:
1 year after transplant
Reported as:
Number · participants
Incidence of Graft Rejection
participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Incidence of Graft Rejection0 (0 to 0)2 (31 to 31)
SecondaryProgression-free Survival

Percentage of patients with progression-free survival, estimated by cumulative incidence methods

Time frame:
3 years after transplant
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Progression-free Survival
percentage of participantsArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Progression-free Survival5336
Statistical analysis
  • Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) vs Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis) · Regression, Cox · p = 0.05 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.56 · 95% CI 0.3 to 1.0

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)—8/41 (19.5%)34/41 (82.9%)
Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)—5/44 (11.4%)20/44 (45.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders2/411/44
thrombosisVascular disorders2/411/44
Graft versus host disease with infection and organ failureImmune system disorders0/412/44
seizureNervous system disorders1/410/44
pericardial effusionCardiac disorders1/410/44
Bactrim anaphylaxisImmune system disorders1/410/44
sepsisInfections and infestations1/410/44
subdural hematomaVascular disorders0/411/44
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 11
Most frequent other events
EventArm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)
Blood/Bone marrowBlood and lymphatic system disorders15/4110/44
HepaticHepatobiliary disorders5/413/44
CardiovascularCardiac disorders4/415/44
PulmonaryRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders4/414/44
Renal/GenitourinaryRenal and urinary disorders4/411/44
HemorrhageVascular disorders3/411/44
Metabolic/LaboratoryMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/411/44
GastrointestinalGastrointestinal disorders2/413/44
PainGeneral disorders1/410/44
Second MalignancyNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/410/44

Baseline characteristics

The randomization will be stratified on institution, disease risk (indolent vs. aggressive), and prior conventional HCT and will be balanced (blocked) over time.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Total
Median57 (18 to 72)54.5 (18 to 74)56 (18 to 74)
Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Total
<=18 years112
Between 18 and 65 years363773
>=65 years4610
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Total
Female161127
Male253358
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Arm I (Chemotherapy, TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Arm II (TBI, Transplant, GVHD Prophylaxis)Total
United States333770
Germany6612
Italy213
08

Study locations

10 sites
  • OHSU Cancer Institute-Southern Region
    Medford, Oregon 97504, United States
  • Huntsman Cancer Institute/University of Utah
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84112, United States
  • LDS Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84143, United States
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System
    Seattle, Washington 98101, United States
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium
    Seattle, Washington 98109, United States
  • Froedtert and the Medical College of Wisconsin
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53226, United States
  • Medizinische Univ Klinik Koln
    Koln, 50924, Germany
  • Universitaet Leipzig
    Leipzig, D-04103, Germany
  • University of Tuebingen-Germany
    Tuebingen, D-72076, Germany
  • University of Torino
    Torino, 10126, Italy
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Kornblit B, Maloney DG, Storb R, Storek J, Hari P, Vucinic V, Maziarz RT, Chauncey TR, Pulsipher MA, Bruno B, Petersen FB, Bethge WA, Hubel K, Bouvier ME, Fukuda T, Storer BE, Sandmaier BM. Fludarabine and 2-Gy TBI is superior to 2 Gy TBI as conditioning for HLA-matched related hematopoietic cell transplantation: a phase III randomized trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Sep;19(9):1340-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jun 11. PubMed 23769990 ↗
  • Cooper JP, Storer BE, Granot N, Gyurkocza B, Sorror ML, Chauncey TR, Shizuru J, Franke GN, Maris MB, Boyer M, Bruno B, Sahebi F, Langston AA, Hari P, Agura ED, Lykke Petersen S, Maziarz RT, Bethge W, Asch J, Gutman JA, Olesen G, Yeager AM, Hubel K, Hogan WJ, Maloney DG, Mielcarek M, Martin PJ, Flowers MED, Georges GE, Woolfrey AE, Deeg JH, Scott BL, McDonald GB, Storb R, Sandmaier BM. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation with non-myeloablative conditioning for patients with hematologic malignancies: Improved outcomes over two decades. Haematologica. 2021 Jun 1;106(6):1599-1607. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2020.248187. PubMed 32499241 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00075478
Lead sponsor
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Responsible party
Brenda Sandmaier (Principal Investigator, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 12, 2004
Start date
Oct 2003
Primary completion
Feb 2014
Completion
Feb 2, 2014
Results posted
May 19, 2014
Last update
May 15, 2017

Study contacts

Brenda Sandmaier
principal investigator · Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/University of Washington Cancer Consortium

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion