CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00032630ROOBYUpdated May 5, 2014Results posted

Outcomes Following Myocardial Revascularization: On and Off Cardiopulmonary Bypass

A Phase 3 interventional study of Coronary artery bypass - on-pump and Coronary artery bypass - off-pump in Ischemic Heart Disease, sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs. Completed at 17 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2014-05-05.

Sponsored by US Department of Veterans Affairs · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
2,203
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ischemic heart disease is one of the most frequent diagnoses in the VA system. Moreover, 5,819 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures were performed in the VA in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. Throughout VA and non-VA cardiac surgery programs nationwide, myocardial revascularization is now being performed using two surgical techniques. One technique is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) usually with cardioplegic arrest ("on-pump") and the other without CPB on a beating heart ("off-pump"). The overall purpose of this proposed randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to rigorously evaluate the impact of using an on-pump versus off-pump surgical technique for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures (performed with a traditional median sternotomy incision) upon patient clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

Read the detailed description

Primary Hypotheses: The study has two primary hypotheses to evaluate the impact of using an off-pump versus an on-pump surgical technique for CABG procedures. One is a short term objective to assess the immediate impact of the two surgical techniques while the second assesses the long-term impact of the two techniques: 1) Short-Term Null Hypothesis: For patients having CABG-only procedures performed, there will be no difference in the short-term composite clinical outcome (30 day death or major morbidity) between patients randomized to the on-pump and off-pump procedures, 2) Long-Term Null Hypothesis: For patients undergoing CABG-only procedures, there will be no difference in long-term clinical outcome as measured by one year mortality and/or acute myocardial infarction prior to one year and/or a subsequent revascularization procedure within one year between patients randomized to the on-pump and off-pump procedures.

Secondary Hypotheses: Major secondary objectives are to determine if there are differences in patients undergoing CABG-only procedures using the on-pump and off-pump techniques for 1) long-term completeness of revascularization, 2) one year graft patency and stenosis rates as determined by angiography at one year, and 3) short-term completeness of revascularization. Other secondary objectives are to evaluate the two surgical techniques on 1) changes in neuropsychological function, 2) traditional clinical outcomes, 3) general and disease specific quality of life, and 4) use of system resources.

Intervention: Patients requiring an elective or urgent CABG-only (no other procedures to be done) surgical procedure will be randomized to either the off-pump procedure or to the on-pump procedure.

Primary Outcomes: The short-term primary outcome measure is a composite measure of death, repeat cardiac surgery, new technical support, cardiac arrest, coma, prolonged stroke and/or renal failure requiring dialyses occurring within 30 days of surgery or prior to discharge, whichever is latest. The long-term primary outcome measure is a composite of death, acute myocardial infarction, and/or subsequent revascularization procedure prior to one year post-surgery.

Study Abstract: Ischemic heart disease is one of the most frequent diagnoses in the VA system. Moreover, 5,819 coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures were performed in the VA in FY 1999. Throughout VA and non-VA cardiac surgery programs nationwide, myocardial revascularization is now being performed using two surgical techniques. One technique is performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) usually with cardioplegic arrest ("on-pump") and the other without CPB on a beating heart ("off-pump"). The overall purpose of this proposed randomized, controlled, clinical trial is to rigorously evaluate the impact of using an on-pump versus off-pump surgical technique for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG-only) procedures (performed with a traditional median sternotomy incision) upon patient clinical outcomes and resource utilization.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Heart Diseases

3,639 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Diseases; 461 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 2,203 is above the median of 100 across 1,778 interventional studies indexed under Heart Diseases.

Browse Heart Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

US Department of Veterans Affairs is the lead sponsor of 658 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Elective or Urgent CABG
  • CABG only procedure to be performed

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient's surgeon is not a participant that meets study off-pup criteria
  • Valve or Valve/CABG procedure
  • Emergent, hemodynamically unstable, or in cardiogenic shock preoperatively
  • Moderate, moderate, to severe, or severe valvular disease
  • Enrolled in another therapeutic or interventional study
  • Majority of diffusely diseased distal vessels
  • Clinical Care Team has reservations
  • History of on-compliance
  • Patient preference for treatment arm
  • Inability to provide informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
2,203 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Arm 1

    Coronary artery bypass - on-pump

    Procedure: Coronary artery bypass - on-pump

  • Other
    Arm 2

    Coronary artery bypass - off-pump

    Procedure: Coronary artery bypass - off-pump

Interventions

  • ProcedureCoronary artery bypass - on-pump

    CABG procedure performed on heart lung machine

  • ProcedureCoronary artery bypass - off-pump

    CABG procedure performed without the use of the heart lung machine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Short-term End Point

    Short-term end point was a composite of death or major complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure requiring dialysis) occuring within 30 days after surgery or before discharge, whichever was later.

    Time frame: 30 day

  2. Long-term Composite

    Long-term composite endpoint was death from any cause within 1 year, nonfatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 1 year, or repeat revascularization between 30 days and 1 year.

    Time frame: one-year

07

Results

Posted Jan 10, 2014

Participant flow

From February 2002 to May 2007, a total of 9663 patients who were scheduled for urgent or elective Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) were screened for enrollment. Of these, 7460 patients were excluded, mostly because of diffusely diseased or small coronary arteries. Overall,1099 patients were randomized to on-pump and 1104 randomized to off-pump

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOn PumpOff Pump
Started10991104
Completed10501061
Not completed4943

Outcome measures

PrimaryShort-term End Point

Short-term end point was a composite of death or major complications (reoperation, new mechanical support, cardiac arrest, coma, stroke, or renal failure requiring dialysis) occuring within 30 days after surgery or before discharge, whichever was later.

Time frame:
30 day
Reported as:
Number · participants
Short-term End Point
participantsOn PumpOff Pump
Short-term End Point61 (0.1 to 4.9)77 (0.1 to 4.9)
PrimaryLong-term Composite

Long-term composite endpoint was death from any cause within 1 year, nonfatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 1 year, or repeat revascularization between 30 days and 1 year.

Time frame:
one-year
Reported as:
Number · Participants
Long-term Composite
ParticipantsOn PumpOff Pump
Long-term Composite78105

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
On Pump—201/1,099 (18.3%)0/1,099 (0%)
Off Pump—220/1,104 (19.9%)0/1,104 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOn PumpOff Pump
Chest PainCardiac disorders64/109969/1104
Myocardial InfarctionCardiac disorders18/109936/1104
Congestive Heart FailureCardiac disorders33/109930/1104
Pleural EffusionRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders32/109930/1104
Atrial FibrillationCardiac disorders15/109922/1104
Wound InfectionInfections and infestations20/109914/1104
CVANervous system disorders19/109919/1104

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)On PumpOff PumpTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years6996711370
>=65 years400433833
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)On PumpOff PumpTotal
Mean62.5 ± 8.563.0 ± 8.562.74 ± 8.49
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)On PumpOff PumpTotal
Female6713
Male109310972190
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)On PumpOff PumpTotal
United States109911042203
08

Study locations

17 sites
  • VA Palo Alto Health Care System
    Palo Alto, California 94304-1290, United States
  • VA Medical Center, San Francisco
    San Francisco, California 94121, United States
  • VA Greater Los Angeles HCS, Sepulveda
    Sepulveda, California 91343, United States
  • VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver
    Denver, Colorado 80220, United States
  • VA Medical Center, DC
    Washington, District of Columbia 20422, United States
  • North Florida/South Georgia Veterans Health System
    Gainesville, Florida 32608, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Miami
    Miami, Florida 33125, United States
  • James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa
    Tampa, Florida 33612, United States
  • New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque
    Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108-5153, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Asheville
    Asheville, North Carolina 28805, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Durham
    Durham, North Carolina 27705, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Cleveland
    Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States
  • VA Medical Center, Portland
    Portland, Oregon 97201, United States
  • VA Pittsburgh Health Care System
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15240, United States
  • VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas
    Dallas, Texas 75216, United States
  • VA South Texas Health Care System, San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78229, United States
  • Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee
    Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53295-1000, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Shroyer AL, Grover FL, Hattler B, Collins JF, McDonald GO, Kozora E, Lucke JC, Baltz JH, Novitzky D; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1827-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902905. PubMed 19890125 ↗
  • Wagner TH, Hattler B, Bishawi M, Baltz JH, Collins JF, Quin JA, Grover FL, Shroyer AL; VA #517 Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. On-pump versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: cost-effectiveness analysis alongside a multisite trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):770-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.074. Epub 2013 Aug 2. PubMed 23916805 ↗
  • Hattler B, Carr BM, Messenger J, Spertus J, Ebrahimi R, Bishawi M, Quin JA, Almassi GH, Collins JF, Kozora E, Grover FL, Shroyer ALW. Clinical and Angiographic Predictors of Patient-Reported Angina 1 Year After Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2019 Apr;12(4):e005119. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.118.005119. PubMed 31001997 ↗
  • Bishawi M, Hattler B, Almassi GH, Spertus JA, Quin JA, Collins JF, Grover FL, Shroyer AL; VA #517 Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Preoperative factors associated with worsening in health-related quality of life following coronary artery bypass grafting in the Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Apr;198:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.12.014. Epub 2017 Dec 24. PubMed 29653645 ↗
  • Almassi GH, Carr BM, Bishawi M, Shroyer AL, Quin JA, Hattler B, Wagner TH, Collins JF, Ravichandran P, Cleveland JC, Grover FL, Bakaeen FG; Veterans Affairs #517 Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Resident versus attending surgeon graft patency and clinical outcomes in on- versus off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Dec;150(6):1428-35, 1437.e1; discussion 1435-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.08.124. Epub 2015 Sep 18. Erratum In: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):895-6. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;151(3):895-896. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.01.003. PubMed 26470910 ↗
  • Almassi GH, Wagner TH, Carr B, Hattler B, Collins JF, Quin JA, Ebrahimi R, Grover FL, Bishawi M, Shroyer AL; VA #517 Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Postoperative atrial fibrillation impacts on costs and one-year clinical outcomes: the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass Trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jan;99(1):109-14. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.07.035. Epub 2014 Nov 6. PubMed 25442992 ↗
  • Hattler B, Messenger JC, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, Haugen SJ, Garcia JA, Baltz JH, Cleveland JC Jr, Novitzky D, Grover FL; Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) Study Group. Off-Pump coronary artery bypass surgery is associated with worse arterial and saphenous vein graft patency and less effective revascularization: Results from the Veterans Affairs Randomized On/Off Bypass (ROOBY) trial. Circulation. 2012 Jun 12;125(23):2827-35. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069260. Epub 2012 May 16. PubMed 22592900 ↗
  • Novitzky D, Baltz JH, Hattler B, Collins JF, Kozora E, Shroyer AL, Grover FL. Outcomes after conversion in the Veterans Affairs randomized on versus off bypass trial. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011 Dec;92(6):2147-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.05.122. Epub 2011 Oct 5. PubMed 21978872 ↗
  • Zenati MA, Shroyer AL, Collins JF, Hattler B, Ota T, Almassi GH, Amidi M, Novitzky D, Grover FL, Sonel AF. Impact of endoscopic versus open saphenous vein harvest technique on late coronary artery bypass grafting patient outcomes in the ROOBY (Randomized On/Off Bypass) Trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Feb;141(2):338-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Dec 3. PubMed 21130476 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2014, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00032630
Lead sponsor
US Department of Veterans Affairs
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 28, 2002
Start date
Apr 2002
Primary completion
Apr 2008
Completion
Apr 2008
Results posted
Jan 10, 2014
Last update
May 5, 2014

Study contacts

Frederick Grover, MD
study chair · VA Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2014. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion