CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT00021957Updated Feb 18, 2016

ESCAPE Mechanistic Substudies - Ancillary to ESCAPE

An observational study in Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases and Heart Failure, sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI). Completed. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-18.

Sponsored by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) · Observational

Study type
Observational
Time perspective
Retrospective
Ages
16 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To determine the value of serum markers as surrogate endpoints and hemodynamic biomarkers of congestive heart failure.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND:

The study will develop easily obtained surrogate markers to be incorporated into a model that can function in place of "hard" end-points in the assessment of new treatments in patients with heart failure. In view of the epidemiologic importance of heart failure and the large and expensive studies currently required to test new treatments, a successful surrogate marker model would be a major advance in this field that would both speed the development and reduce the cost of therapeutic advances.

The study is ancillary to the NHLBI-supported clinical trial "Evaluation Study of Congestive Heart Failure and Pulmonary Artery Catheterization Effectiveness (ESCAPE)." ESCAPE compares the efficacy of Pulmonary Artery Catheterization (PAC)-directed treatment strategy to a non-invasive treatment strategy on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe, class IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) congestive heart failure. A secondary objective of ESCAPE is to determine costs and resource utilization of PAC-directed treatment strategy compared to non-invasive treatment strategy.

The study is in response to an initiative "Ancillary Studies in Heart, Lung, and Blood Disease Trials" released by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in June 2000.

DESIGN NARRATIVE:

The ancillary, prospective, observational study is designed to evaluate the potential of the serum biomarkers atrial natriuretic peptide, brain natriuretic peptide, and cardiac troponins to serve both as prognostic indices and as surrogate endpoints for death and hospitalization in heart failure trials. The first goal wlll be accomplished by evaluating outcomes. The investigators will develop a risk score for patients with advanced heart failure that incorporates the serum biomarkers and clinical variables and test for interactions between this score and pulmonary artery catheterization. They will evaluate the ability of serum biomarkers to serve as objective measures of both clinical and hemodynamic status and will assess the potential of these markers to serve as tools to assist with the selection and titration of therapies. In addition. they will examine the relations between levels of natriuretic peptides, troponins, and catecholamines.

This information will be the launching point for the second goal, which will be to examine the relationship between the serum biomarkers and the treatment effect of pulmonary-artery catheterization on death and hospitalization. In addition, the investigators will evaluate the relations between levels of natriuretic peptides, troponins, and the treatment effects of B-adrenergic antagonists and inotropic agents on clinical outcomes. Ultimately, they intend to construct a statistical model that incorporates the serum biomarkers with greatest promise and clinical variables demonstrated to predict survival. This final model may prove to be the best surrogate endpoint possible, as it will capture an array of physiological mechanisms through which pulmonary-artery catheter guided therapy may have an effect.

This proposed substudy will be conducted within the framework of the ESCAPE trial. Natriuretic peptide levels are currently being collected at randomization, discharge, one month, and six months as a secondary endpoint of the trial. Catecholamines are also being collected at baseline and three months. In addition, the ESCAPE investigators are all ready capturing detailed demographic, clinical, and physiological information as part of the protocol for the primary study.

The study completion date listed in this record was obtained from the "End Date" entered in the Protocol Registration and Results System (PRS) record.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Heart Diseases
  • Heart Failure
  • Heart Failure, Congestive
03

In context

Heart Failure

5,701 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,220 are open to participants now.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) is the lead sponsor of 1,117 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 57 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

No eligibility criteria

05

Study design

Time perspective
Retrospective
06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT00021957
Lead sponsor
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
First posted
Aug 10, 2001
Start date
Apr 2001
Completion
Mar 2005
Last update
Feb 18, 2016

Study contacts

Robert Califf
Duke University
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2005. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion