An observational study in HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus) and Papilloma Viral Infection, sponsored by Hospital Universitario San Ignacio. Completed at 1 site in Colombia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-13.
Sponsored by Hospital Universitario San Ignacio · Observational
Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →
People living with HIV (PLWH) bear a disproportionate burden of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease, yet local data across anatomical sites are limited in Colombia and Latin America.
This single-centre cross-sectional study, conducted among adults living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy at the HIV clinic of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia, aimed to estimate the prevalence of HPV infection and cytological abnormalities in the anus, cervix and oropharynx; to describe high-risk HPV genotype distribution at each site; and, within the anal component, to explore factors associated with high-risk HPV detection and the agreement between anal cytology and HPV genotyping. Participants were selected by simple random sampling from eligible adults attending the HIV clinic, and liquid-based cytology and extended high-risk HPV genotyping were performed on anal, cervical (when applicable), and oropharyngeal samples.
This was a single-centre, cross-sectional observational study involving one group of adults living with HIV, selected through simple random sampling from the HIV clinic at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio (HUSI), a tertiary-care university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia. Study procedures were conducted between March 2023 and September 2025.
Eligibility Eligible participants were PLWH aged 18 years or older receiving ART for at least three months. Individuals with obstructive anal, cervical, or oral tumours, contraindications to study procedures, cognitive impairment limiting questionnaire comprehension, active cancer treatment, pregnancy with threatened abortion or preterm labour, or refusal to consent were excluded.
Sample size and sampling strategy Participants were selected by simple random sampling from eligible adults at the HUSI HIV clinic. The sample size was calculated to estimate anal high-risk HPV prevalence, assuming a 95% confidence level, 5% absolute precision, a design effect of 1.0, and a source population of 2,200 PLWH. Based on an expected prevalence of 80%, the required minimum was 222 participants; allowing for non-participation and non-evaluable samples, 319 individuals were invited.
Study variables and procedures
Baseline
At baseline, the investigators collected sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural, mental health, and HIV-related information through a structured interview and review of medical records. A stable partnership was defined by marital status and sexual behaviour: participants were classified as having a stable partner if they were married or cohabiting and reported only one sexual partner in the previous year. Condom use referred to condom use at the most recent sexual intercourse, and recreational drug use to self-reported use of psychoactive substances other than alcohol or tobacco. Sexual-practice variables included self-reported anal and oral intercourse. Socioeconomic status was classified as low or middle/high according to the Colombian socioeconomic stratification system. Other variables included previous HPV-related screening, HPV vaccination status, sexually transmitted infections in the previous year, the most recent CD4+ T-cell count, and HIV viral load. All participants were receiving ART, recorded as a nucleoside backbone plus a third or fourth agent when applicable; for the analysis, the regimen was classified by whether it included an integrase strand transfer inhibitor.
Physical examination After eligibility was confirmed and informed consent obtained, participants underwent a directed physical examination of the anal, genital (when applicable), and oral/oropharyngeal regions. Anal, cervical (when applicable), and oropharyngeal samples were assessed by cytology and extended HPV DNA genotyping.
Procedures Site-specific samples were collected by trained personnel according to the internal laboratory protocol; when an anal sample was unsatisfactory for cytology or genotyping, repeat sampling was offered. Before anal sampling, participants were advised to avoid anal intercourse and enemas during the preceding 24 hours. Cervical samples were obtained with a Rovers® Cervex-Brush®, and anal and oropharyngeal samples with a cytobrush suitable for epithelial cell sampling. All specimens were transferred to SurePath™ liquid-based cytology medium (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and processed according to the internal laboratory protocol.
Cytology Cytological evaluation was performed on all specimens, and aliquots from the same samples were used for high-risk HPV DNA detection and extended genotyping. Cytological findings from all sites, including anal sample adequacy, were classified according to the Bethesda System. Results were categorised as negative when no epithelial abnormality was reported, and as abnormal when any epithelial abnormality was present (ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL, HSIL suspicious for invasion, or squamous cell carcinoma). As the Bethesda System is standardised for cervical cytology, criteria for sample representativeness and adequacy at the oropharyngeal site were adapted following previous work by the research group.
HPV genotyping Extended high-risk HPV genotyping was performed using the BD Onclarity™ HPV Assay, which individually detects genotypes 16, 18, 31, 45, 51, and 52 and reports the remaining high-risk genotypes in three groups: 33/58, 56/59/66, and 35/39/68. Although the assay is validated and FDA-approved for cervical specimens, its use in anal and oropharyngeal specimens is off-label. Before study implementation, the laboratory performed an internal analytical validation of SurePath-preserved anal and oropharyngeal specimens on this platform. For anal specimens, the assay has been evaluated in a recent prospective study using histologically confirmed anal intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (AIN2+) as the clinical endpoint, reporting a sensitivity of 87.7% (95% CI 76.3-94.9) for extended high-risk HPV detection.
Psychiatric evaluation Anxiety and depressive symptoms were assessed using the GAD-7 and PHQ-9. Based on previously reported evidence, at a cut-off of ≥10 the GAD-7 has a sensitivity and specificity of 89% and 82% for generalised anxiety disorder, and the PHQ-9 of 88% for major depression. Participants scoring ≥10 on either scale were referred for mental health evaluation. For the analysis, clinically relevant depressive symptoms were defined as a PHQ-9 score ≥5 (at least mild symptoms). Mental health symptoms will be completely addressed in a separate analysis.
Outcomes The main outcomes were overall and site-specific HPV detection, high-risk HPV genotype detection, and cytological abnormalities. High-risk genotypes were defined as types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68, consistent with genotypes commonly reported as high-risk.
Exploratory secondary outcomes included associations of sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural, mental health, and immunovirological factors with anal high-risk HPV detection, together with agreement between anal cytology and anal high-risk HPV genotyping.
Data management Clinical information was recorded in the institutional electronic medical record, and GAD-7 and PHQ-9 questionnaires on paper. All data were entered into REDCap by the study coordinator, with a sequential anonymous identifier per participant. Cytology and genotyping reports were entered into the same database, and a 100% audit verified completeness and concordance with the primary source. Database access was restricted to authorised personnel, and identifiable information was excluded from the analysis dataset, following institutional confidentiality procedures and Colombian data protection regulations.
Statistical analysis Descriptive analysis Sociodemographic, clinical, behavioural, and HIV-related characteristics were summarised using absolute and relative frequencies. Baseline characteristics were presented for the overall sample and stratified by detection of anal HPV-16/18 and HPV-16/18/31/45.
Bivariate and multivariable analyses An exploratory analysis assessed associations between anal high-risk HPV genotype detection and variables previously reported as potentially associated with a positive result, including age, condom use, recreational drug use, stable partnership, antiretroviral regimen, CD4+ T-cell count, and HIV viral load; a positive depression screen was also explored. This analysis was restricted to participants with adequate/evaluable anal cytology and valid anal HPV genotyping. Associations were assessed for two outcomes (anal HPV-16/18 and HPV-16/18/31/45). These genotypes were selected because of their well-established oncogenic relevance. Crude associations were estimated by entering each variable separately into a log-binomial model to obtain crude prevalence ratios (PRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All prespecified covariates were then entered simultaneously; as the multivariable log-binomial models did not converge, Poisson regression with a log link and robust variance estimator (HC0) was used to estimate adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) with 95% CIs. Diagnostics included convergence and multicollinearity (variance inflation factors); no substantial multicollinearity was found.
Missing data Missing data were assessed within the analytical population (participants with adequate/evaluable anal cytology and valid anal HPV genotyping; N=255). Missingness was below 10% for all variables and was handled using multiple imputation by chained equations (MICE), assuming data missing at random. Imputation was applied only to the secondary analysis of factors associated with high-risk genotype detection. Twenty imputed datasets were generated with 20 iterations each; convergence was assessed with trace plots and imputed values compared with observed distributions. Estimates and 95% CIs were pooled using Rubin's rules.
Concordance analysis between HPV genotyping and cytology findings Agreement between anal HPV genotyping categories (HPV-16 alone, HPV-16/18, HPV-16/18/31/45, and any high-risk genotype) and anal cytology was assessed using row percentages and Cohen's kappa (κ) with 95% CIs. Associations between the same categories and anal epithelial abnormalities were assessed using row percentages and Cramér's V with 95% CIs, with significance tested by the χ² test. Given their exploratory nature, findings were interpreted according to clinical relevance and precision rather than statistical significance alone.
Software Data cleaning, descriptive analyses, and statistical modelling were performed using R version 4.5.1 in RStudio (version 2026.07.0+139).
Ethical considerations The study protocol was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio and Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (FM-CIE-1162-22). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrolment. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Colombian regulations, and participant confidentiality was protected according to institutional data protection procedures.
577 studies on the registry are indexed under Papillomavirus Infections; 132 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 300 is below the median of 486 across 157 observational studies indexed under Papillomavirus Infections.
Browse Papillomavirus Infections studies →Hospital Universitario San Ignacio is the lead sponsor of 26 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.
Compared within Papillomavirus Infections, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →
Adults living with HIV receiving antiretroviral therapy at the HIV clinic of Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, a tertiary-care university hospital in Bogotá, Colombia (source population approximately 2,200 people).
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
HIV
The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.
Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Adults aged 18 years or older living with HIV and receiving antiretroviral therapy for at least three months at Hospital Universitario San Ignacio in Bogotá, Colombia. Participants were selected through simple random sampling and underwent clinical assessment, liquid-based cytology, and extended high-risk HPV genotyping of anal, cervical (when applicable), and oropharyngeal samples.
Diagnostic Test: Extended High-Risk HPV Genotyping · Diagnostic Test: Liquid-Based Cytology
Extended high-risk HPV DNA genotyping was performed using the BD Onclarity HPV Assay on anal, cervical (when applicable), and oropharyngeal samples collected during the study assessment. The assay detects individual HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 45, 51, and 52, and reports additional high-risk genotypes in grouped categories.
Liquid-based cytology was performed on anal, cervical (when applicable), and oropharyngeal samples collected during the study assessment. Cytological findings were classified according to the Bethesda System to identify epithelial abnormalities, including ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL.
Prevalence of High-Risk HPV Infection by Anatomical Site
Proportion of participants with HPV DNA detected (any high-risk genotype) in anal, cervical (women) and oropharyngeal samples by extended genotyping (BD Onclarity HPV Assay), overall and by site. High-risk genotypes: 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Distribution of high-risk HPV genotypes by anatomical site
Proportion of participants positive for each genotype or genotype group reported by the assay (16; 18; 31; 45; 51; 52; 33/58; 56/59/66; 35/39/68) at each anatomical site.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Prevalence of cytological abnormalities by anatomical site
Proportion of participants with any epithelial abnormality on liquid-based cytology (ASC-US, ASC-H, LSIL, HSIL, HSIL suspicious for invasion or squamous cell carcinoma) according to the Bethesda System, in anal, cervical and oropharyngeal samples.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Factors associated with anal high-risk HPV detection.
Crude and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs and aPRs) with 95% confidence intervals for anal HPV-16/18 and HPV-16/18/31/45 detection, according to sociodemographic, behavioural, clinical, and HIV-related characteristics, including age, stable partnership, socioeconomic status, condom use, recreational drug use, antiretroviral regimen, CD4+ T-cell count, HIV viral load, history of sexually transmitted infections, and depressive symptoms. Exploratory analysis.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Agreement between anal cytology and anal high-risk HPV genotyping
Cohen's kappa (95% CI) between anal cytology results and anal HPV genotyping categories (HPV-16, HPV-16/18, HPV-16/18/31/45, any high-risk genotype).
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Histologically confirmed HPV-related lesions
Proportion of participants with LSIL, HSIL or carcinoma on biopsy from high-resolution anoscopy or colposcopy performed after abnormal results. To be reported separately.
Time frame: Up to 45 days after the study visit
Anxiety Symptoms
Proportion of participants with a GAD-7 score of 10 or higher.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Depressive Symptoms
Proportion of participants with a PHQ-9 score of 10 or higher.
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the publication may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to institutional approval and applicable data protection requirements.
Time frame: Following publication of the study results, upon reasonable request.
Access criteria: Researchers may request access to de-identified data by contacting the corresponding author at neortiz@husi.org.co. Requests will be evaluated based on their scientific purpose and compliance with institutional policies, ethical approvals, and applicable data protection regulations.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Mar 2023 to primary completion in Nov 2025, 32 months.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Hospital Universitario San Ignacio