ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07929454Updated Nov 10, 2026

Evaluation of Orthodontic Bands Coated With Nano-silver Fluoride

An interventional study of Nano-silver Fluoride Coated Orthodontic Bands and Conventional Uncoated Orthodontic Bands in White Spot Lesion of Tooth, Pocket, Periodontal and Dental Caries Tooth Demineralization, sponsored by Ebrahim N Abbas. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-10.

Sponsored by Ebrahim N Abbas · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Nov 10, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
25
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

  1. Aim of the Study To evaluate the antibacterial and enamel remineralization effects of nano-silver fluoride-coated orthodontic bands compared with conventional non-coated bands in orthodontic patients over 6 months.
  2. What Will I Do in This Study?

    • Conduct a randomized split-mouth clinical trial involving 25 patients.
    • Place orthodontic bands on the maxillary first molars, with one band coated and the contralateral band left uncoated as the control.
    • Randomize the right or left side receiving the coated band.
    • Collect dental plaque samples after 24 hours, 3 months, and 6 months to measure bacterial counts, particularly Streptococcus mutans, using colony-forming unit (CFU) counting.
    • Assess enamel demineralization and remineralization using DIAGNOdent measurements before band placement and after band removal.
  3. Materials Used

    • Orthodontic bands: Stainless steel molar bands.
    • Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs): Concentration of 5 µg/mL, with an average particle size of 40 nm.
    • Fluoride: Concentration of 5 ppm.
    • Coating technique: Dip coating, followed by air-drying and incubator drying.
Read the detailed description
  1. Background Fixed orthodontic appliances, particularly orthodontic molar bands, contribute significantly to increased plaque retention and bacterial accumulation around the teeth. This heightens the risk of enamel demineralization and the formation of white spot lesions (WSLs). Streptococcus mutans is considered one of the primary etiologic agents in this process, owing to its ability to produce acids that lower plaque pH and initiate enamel demineralization.

    Because conventional preventive measures rely heavily on patient compliance and optimal oral hygiene, research has shifted toward developing orthodontic materials with intrinsic antibacterial properties. Nano-Silver Fluoride (NSF)-which combines silver nanoparticles with fluoride-presents a promising agent, as it is expected to reduce bacterial colonization while promoting enamel remineralization. However, clinical evidence evaluating its direct application as a coating on orthodontic molar bands remains limited.

  2. Aim of the Study This split-mouth clinical trial aims to evaluate the antibacterial efficacy and enamel remineralization potential of stainless steel orthodontic molar bands coated with Nano-Silver Fluoride compared to uncoated bands during active orthodontic treatment.
  3. Interventions This study will be conducted on 25 patients using a split-mouth design, where each patient will receive a coated molar band on one maxillary first molar and an uncoated band on the contralateral maxillary first molar, with side allocation determined through randomization.

    Experimental Group: Stainless steel molar bands coated with a Nano-Silver Fluoride solution containing silver nanoparticles (5 µg/mL concentration, 40 nm particle size) and fluoride (5 ppm concentration).

    Control Group: Conventional, uncoated stainless steel molar bands.

    Coating Method: Dip-coating technique, where the bands are thoroughly cleaned, submerged in the NSF solution for a specified duration, air-dried, and subsequently oven-dried to ensure a stable coating layer.

    Assessment of Antibacterial Effect: Plaque samples will be collected from the area surrounding the bands to quantify Streptococcus mutans levels using Colony-Forming Units (CFU) at 24 hours, 3 months, and 6 months.

    Assessment of Enamel Remineralization: Changes in white spot lesions and enamel demineralization levels will be measured using DIAGNOdent before band placement and after band removal according to the study's follow-up schedule.

  4. Summary / Conclusion This study investigates the feasibility of transforming orthodontic molar bands from passive mechanical retention devices into active preventive components that combine antibacterial activity with the preservation of enamel integrity during orthodontic therapy.
02

Conditions studied

  • White Spot Lesion of Tooth
  • Pocket, Periodontal
  • Dental Caries Tooth Demineralization

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Namo-silver fluoride
  • Orthodontic bands
  • Antibacterial effect
  • Remineralization
03

In context

Periodontal Pocket

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Periodontal Pocket; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 25 is below the median of 30 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Periodontal Pocket.

Browse Periodontal Pocket studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Ebrahim N Abbas as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

    • Patients presenting with malocclusion, including crowding, spacing, increased overjet or overbite, crossbite, or open bite.

      • Presence of a sufficient number of erupted permanent teeth to allow effective placement and retention of orthodontic appliances.
      • Good oral and periodontal health, with no active caries or untreated periodontal disease.
      • Systemically healthy patients, or those with controlled medical conditions that do not contraindicate orthodontic tooth movement.
      • Patients demonstrating adequate motivation and willingness to cooperate, including maintaining oral hygiene and attending regular follow-up visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

    • Presence of active dental caries or Poor oral hygiene.

      • Active periodontal disease, including gingivitis or periodontitis with attachment loss.
      • Patients with uncontrolled systemic diseases that may affect bone metabolism or healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, metabolic bone disorders).
      • Use of medications that adversely affect orthodontic tooth movement and cannot be medically managed.
      • Insufficient erupted teeth to support orthodontic appliances.
      • Low motivation or poor compliance, including failure to attend appointments or follow treatment instructions.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
25 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nano-silver Fluoride Coated Orthodontic Bands

    Participants receiving orthodontic bands coated with Nano-silver Fluoride (NSF).

    Device: Nano-silver Fluoride Coated Orthodontic Bands

  • Other
    Uncoated Orthodontic Bands

    Participants receiving conventional uncoated orthodontic bands.

    Other: Conventional Uncoated Orthodontic Bands

Interventions

  • DeviceNano-silver Fluoride Coated Orthodontic Bands

    Orthodontic bands coated with Nano-silver Fluoride (NSF) solution applied to cementation to evaluate antibacterial and remineralization effects.

  • OtherConventional Uncoated Orthodontic Bands

    Standard uncoated orthodontic bands were used as a control group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Streptococcus mutans count in plaque around the band

    Plaque samples will be collected from around the orthodontic band to quantify Streptococcus mutans levels using Colony Forming Units (CFU/mL) count.

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-placement.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Remineralization Effect

    The incidence and severity of white spot lesions on the first molars will be assessed using laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdent).

    Time frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-placement.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 6 months after the start.

Of 59 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periodontal Pocket, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 22, 2026
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
StartActual
Aug 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 8, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 8, 2027
Last update
Nov 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 10, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 10, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07929454
Lead sponsor
Ebrahim N Abbas
Responsible party
Ebrahim N Abbas (MSc Candidate, Department of Orthodontics, Mansoura University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Nov 10, 2026
Start date
Aug 8, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 8, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 8, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 10, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion