ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07919769CSTvsMPPTUpdated Nov 5, 2026

A Closed Surgical Technique vs Modified Papilla Preservation Technique

An interventional study of Access Flap and Close Surgical Technique in Intrabony Periodontal Defect, Treatment and Residual, sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki. Recruiting at 1 site in Greece. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A pioneer periodontal surgical approach employing the closed surgical technique (CST) has been designed to gain access to isolated interdental periodontal defects and retain the soft-tissue architecture. This technique is based on a modified tunnelling technique to retract full-thickness gingival flaps from the osseous defect in a closed manner retaining intact the interproximal papilla thus, suturing is not required. A randomized controlled clinical trial will determine the efficacy of the CST combined with i-PRF versus the modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT) combined with i-PRF over a period of 12 months

Read the detailed description

This randomized controlled clinical trial will compare the CST combined with i-PRF over the papilla preservation technique (MPPT) combined with i-PRF to treat isolated interdental defects in terms of gain in clinical attachment levels, radiographic evidence of bone apposition and local reduction of biomarkers (VEGF, OPG, RANKL) over a period of 12 months. For the preparation of i-PRF, 20 mL of venous blood is initially collected from each patient under aseptic conditions. The blood samples are then immediately centrifuged at a relative centrifugal force of 700 × g for 8 minutes.

  1. First visit - initial examination - at least 3 months after initial non-surgical periodontal treatment (Step 1, 2) Update general and dental history Screening of subjects for suitability; Consent form; Randomization of suitable subjects Intra-oral photography Full-mouth charting: Probing pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (Rec) Oral hygiene instructions (soft toothbrush, modified Bass, interdental cleaning) Full mouth supragingival scaling
  2. Second visit - Baseline - T0 Collection of Gingival Crevice Fluid (GCF) using sterilized paper strips. Radiographic examination of the site (Long-cone paralleling technique using a digital sensor attached to a custom-made silicone bite block for reproducible radiographs). Periodontal site-selected clinical assessment. Periodontal surgery (control: MPPT or test: the CST) under local anesthesia. Modification of oral hygiene instructions; post-operative instructions Intra-oral photography
  3. Third visit - T1 (2 weeks post-operatively) Suture removal (only in control group) Wound healing visual monitoring by the Early Healing Index (1-5) Oral hygiene instructions. Intra-oral photography. Questionnaire for subjective feelings and satisfaction
  4. Fourth visit - T2 (6 weeks post-operatively) Oral hygiene instructions. Intra-oral photography. Supragingival plaque removal
  5. Fifth visit - T3 - (3 months post-operatively). Oral hygiene instructions. Intra-oral photography. Supragingival plaque removal
  6. Sixth visit - T4 - Re-evaluation (6 months post-operatively) GCF collection using sterilized paper strips. Periodontal full-mouth charting. Site-selected periodontal clinical assessment; Probing Pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (REC) Radiographic examination of the site. Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography
  7. Seventh visit - T5 - Re-evaluation (12 months post-operatively) GCF collection using sterilized paper strips. Periodontal full-mouth charting. Site-selected periodontal clinical assessment; Probing Pocket depth (PPD), Clinical Attachment Level (CAL), Plaque Index (PI), Bleeding on Probing (BoP), Gingival Recession (REC) Radiographic examination of the site. Oral hygiene instructions Intra-oral photography
02

Conditions studied

  • Intrabony Periodontal Defect
  • Treatment
  • Residual
  • Periodontal Pocket

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Interdental periodontal defect
  • periodontal surgery
  • papilla preservation
  • tunnelling technique
  • closed surgical technique
03

In context

Periodontal Pocket

130 studies on the registry are indexed under Periodontal Pocket; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 30 across 113 interventional studies indexed under Periodontal Pocket.

Browse Periodontal Pocket studies →

Lead sponsor

Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki is the lead sponsor of 282 studies on the registry; 55 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systematically healthy subjects, not having consumed antibiotics 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline)
  • Smokers \<10 cig/day, former smokers or no smokers
  • Periodontal patients fulfilling non-surgical initial periodontal treatment at least 3 months before surgical periodontal treatment (baseline day) and presenting at least one residual pocket with PPD and CAL ≥6mm and bleeding on probing, located interproximally with intrerdental site ≥2mm.
  • Compliant patients presenting high standards of oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index \<20%) strictly susceptible in Supportive Periodontal

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated active periodontal inflammation
  • Poorly controlled systematic diseases
  • Disorders compromise wound healing
  • Bisphosphonate medications
  • Patients under radiotherapy or chemotherapy
  • Drug-induced gingival hyperplasia
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Poor compliance during steps 1 and 2 of cause-related periodontal treatment
  • Compromised oral hygiene (full mouth Plaque Index >30%),
  • circumferential bone defect or narrow intrerdental site ≤2mm.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Access Flap Surgery combined with i-PRF

    Group A Intrasulcular incisions at the teeth adjacent to the defect, using the modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT). Granulation tissue is excised and debridement via hand and power-driven instruments follows. Flaps are repositioned and papilla are sutured with horizontal internal mattress doubled by a single interrupted interdental suture.

    Procedure: Access Flap

  • Experimental
    Closed Surgical Technique combined with i-PRF

    Experimental: Group B Strictly intrasulcular incisions are performed at the teeth adjacent to the defect (mid-buccal to mid-lingual) without incising the interdental papilla. Full thickness gingival flaps, at the base of the papilla, which is retained intact, are elevated in a "closed"-tunneling manner, granting access to the interdental osseous defect. Debridement is performed via power-driven tips and mini curettes, without intentional excising the granulation tissue that lines the osseous defect. Flaps are repositioned by gentle pressure and suturing is not required.

    Procedure: Close Surgical Technique

Interventions

  • ProcedureAccess Flap

    Procedure/Surgery: Access Flap Intrasulcular incisions at the teeth adjacent to the defect, using the modified papilla preservation technique (MPPT). Granulation tissue is excised and debridement via hand and power-driven instruments follows. Autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared by centrifugation and then injected into the periodontal intrabony defect as an autologous bioactive adjunct to surgical treatment. Flaps are repositioned and papilla are sutured with horizontal internal mattress doubled by a single interrupted interdental suture.

  • ProcedureClose Surgical Technique

    Strictly intrasulcular incisions are performed at the teeth adjacent to the defect (mid-buccal to mid-lingual) without incising the interdental papilla. Full thickness gingival flaps, at the base of the papilla, which is retained intact, are elevated in a "closed"-tunneling manner, granting access to the interdental osseous defect. Debridement is performed via power-driven tips and mini curettes, without intentionally excising the granulation tissue that lines the osseous defect. Autologous injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF) is prepared by centrifugation and then injected into the periodontal intrabony defect as an autologous bioactive adjunct to surgical treatment. Flaps are repositioned by gentle pressure and suturing is not required.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Clinical Attachment Level

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe(Hu-Friedy XP-23/QW) by a single examiner at the nearest of 1mm

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  2. Cementoenamel junction to Bottom of the defect

    Determined on standardized periapical radiographs obtained by the long cone parallel technique

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Probing Pocket Depth

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  2. Recession

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  3. Reduction of biomarkers (VEGF, OPG, RANKL)

    Determined by ELISA in GCF

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  4. Bleeding on Probing

    Determined by a manual periodontal probe

    Time frame: baseline to 12 months

  5. Patient satisfaction and perception

    Determined on questionnaires

    Time frame: 2 weeks following surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Apatzidou DA, Bakopoulou AA, Kouzi-Koliakou K, Karagiannis V, Konstantinidis A. A tissue-engineered biocomplex for periodontal reconstruction. A proof-of-principle randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Aug;48(8):1111-1125. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13474. Epub 2021 May 14. PubMed 33899259 ↗
  • Cortellini P, Tonetti MS. A minimally invasive surgical technique with an enamel matrix derivative in the regenerative treatment of intra-bony defects: a novel approach to limit morbidity. J Clin Periodontol. 2007 Jan;34(1):87-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.01020.x. PubMed 17243998 ↗
  • Cortellini P, Prato GP, Tonetti MS. The modified papilla preservation technique. A new surgical approach for interproximal regenerative procedures. J Periodontol. 1995 Apr;66(4):261-6. doi: 10.1902/jop.1995.66.4.261. PubMed 7782979 ↗
  • Apatzidou DA, Nile C, Bakopoulou A, Konstantinidis A, Lappin DF. Stem cell-like populations and immunoregulatory molecules in periodontal granulation tissue. J Periodontal Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):610-621. doi: 10.1111/jre.12551. Epub 2018 Apr 23. PubMed 29687448 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Overall data but not on an individual basis will be disclosed and shared

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2028, 21 months after the start.

Of 59 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Periodontal Pocket, half reached primary completion within 16 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26. This study's planned 21 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 63 studies reached it within 16 months; a quarter within 9 and three quarters within 26.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 1, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartActual
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jul 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07919769
Responsible party
Danae A. Apatzidou (Professor, Aristotle University Of Thessaloniki) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Danae Apatzidou, Professor
Contact
perioapatzidou@yahoo.gr
+30 6934770361
Theodoros-Filippos Valamvanos, PG Student
Contact
valamvanos.filippos@gmail.com
+30 6957165469
Danae Apatzidou, Professor
study director · Dept of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology and Implant Biology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion