ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07926958GLIDE-DHFUpdated Nov 9, 2026

Natriuresis With Acetazolamide or SGLT2 Inhibitors Added to Intravenous Loop Diuretics in Decompensated Heart Failure

A Phase 4 interventional study of Furosemide and Acetazolamide in Heart Failure and Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF), sponsored by Universidade do Porto. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Portugal. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Universidade do Porto · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2024, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
68
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The GLIDE-DHF study compares the natriuretic effect of adding acetazolamide or a sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) to intravenous loop diuretics, versus intravenous loop diuretics alone, in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute decompensated heart failure. Natriuresis is assessed by spot urinary sodium concentration measured 6 hours after the first study treatment. The study also evaluates changes in urinary and serum electrolytes, kidney function, blood pressure, clinical congestion and safety during the first 3 days of treatment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure
  • Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF)

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 68 is below the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidade do Porto is the lead sponsor of 174 studies on the registry; 53 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Admission to the emergency department with a primary diagnosis of decompensated heart failure
  • Inclusion within the first 24 hours after emergency department admission
  • In patients who received intravenous loop diuretics before inclusion, baseline urine sample collected at least 6 hours after the last loop diuretic dose
  • Written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hemodynamic instability (systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg and/or serum lactate >2 mmol/L)
  • Decompensated heart failure in the setting of an acute coronary syndrome
  • Chronic maintenance therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor or acetazolamide before the current episode
  • Baseline estimated (outside the acute episode) \<20 mL/min/1.73 m²
  • Renal replacement therapy
  • Metabolic or respiratory acidosis (arterial pH \<7.35)
  • Sodium bicarbonate administration before inclusion
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
68 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Loop diuretic alone (LD)

    Intravenous furosemide. Initial dose: twice the oral outpatient dose (maximum 160 mg IV), or 40 mg IV in patients not on chronic loop diuretics. Subsequent dose adjustments at the attending physician's discretion.

    Drug: Furosemide

  • Experimental
    Loop diuretic + SGLT2 inhibitor (LD+SGLT2i)

    Intravenous furosemide (as in the LD arm) plus oral dapagliflozin 10 mg or empagliflozin 10 mg once daily, started on day 1. SGLT2i may be continued after day 3.

    Drug: Furosemide · Drug: Dapagliflozin · Drug: Empagliflozin

  • Experimental
    Loop diuretic + acetazolamide (LD+A)

    Intravenous furosemide (as in the LD arm) plus intravenous acetazolamide 500 mg once daily for a maximum of 3 days (maximum 3 administrations).

    Drug: Furosemide · Drug: Acetazolamide

Interventions

  • Intravenous furosemide; initial dose twice the oral outpatient dose (max 160 mg) or 40 mg if loop diuretic-naïve; subsequent adjustments per attending physician.

  • Intravenous acetazolamide 500 mg once daily for up to 3 days.

  • Oral dapagliflozin 10 mg once daily.

  • Oral empagliflozin 10 mg once daily.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in spot urinary sodium concentration at 6 hours

    Change in spot urinary sodium concentration (mmol/L) from baseline to 6 hours after the first study treatment administration. The main comparison is LD+A versus LD alone; the comparison of LD+SGLT2i versus LD alone is secondary.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 hours after the first study treatment administration (day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in spot urinary sodium concentration at day 3

    Change in spot urinary sodium (mmol/L) from baseline to 6 hours after the third study treatment administration.

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 hours after the third study treatment administration (day 3)

  2. Proportion of patients with spot urinary sodium >70 mmol/L

    Percentage of patients achieving spot urinary sodium \>70 mmol/L 6 hours after the first study treatment administration.

    Time frame: 6 hours after first administration (day 1)

  3. Change in spot urinary potassium

    Change in spot urinary potassium (mmol/L) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 hours after first administration (day 1) and 6 hours after third administration (day 3)

  4. Change in spot urinary magnesium

    Change in spot urinary magnesium from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 hours after first administration (day 1) and 6 hours after third administration (day 3)

  5. Change in spot urinary phosphate

    Change in spot urinary phosphate from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6 hours after first administration (day 1) and 6 hours after third administration (day 3)

  6. Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)

    Change in eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m²) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  7. Change in hemoglobin

    Change in hemoglobin (g/dL) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  8. Change in hematocrit

    Change in hematocrit (%) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  9. Change in serum urea

    Change in serum urea (mg/dL) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  10. Change in serum sodium

    Change in serum sodium (mmol/L) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  11. Change in serum potassium

    Change in serum potassium (mmol/L) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  12. Change in serum chloride

    Change in serum chloride (mmol/L) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline and day 3

  13. Change in systolic blood pressure

    Change in systolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 2 and day 3

  14. Change in diastolic blood pressure

    Change in diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, day 2 and day 3

  15. Change in clinical congestion score

    Change in the clinical congestion score from baseline. The clinical congestion score is a composite score based on three items (orthopnea, peripheral edema and jugular venous pressure elevation), each graded from 0 to 3, with a total score ranging from 0 (no congestion) to 9 (maximum congestion). Higher scores indicate a worse outcome (more congestion).

    Time frame: Baseline, day 2 and day 3

  16. Proportion of patients with clinical decongestion

    Percentage of patients achieving clinical decongestion, defined as a clinical congestion score ≤2 points. The clinical congestion score is a composite score based on orthopnea, peripheral edema and jugular venous pressure elevation, each graded from 0 to 3 (total score 0-9; higher scores indicate more congestion).

    Time frame: Day 3

  17. Cumulative intravenous loop diuretic dose

    Cumulative intravenous furosemide dose (mg) administered up to day 3.

    Time frame: Up to day 3

  18. Incidence of hypokalemia

    Percentage of patients with serum potassium \<3.5 mmol/L.

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

  19. Incidence of severe hypokalemia

    Percentage of patients with serum potassium \<3.0 mmol/L.

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

  20. Incidence of hyponatremia

    Percentage of patients with serum sodium \<135 mmol/L.

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

  21. Incidence of hypotension

    Percentage of patients with systolic blood pressure \<90 mmHg.

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

  22. Incidence of stage 2 acute kidney injury

    Percentage of patients with stage 2 acute kidney injury according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) staging criteria, defined as at least doubling of serum creatinine from baseline. KDIGO stages range from 1 to 3, with higher stages indicating more severe kidney injury (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

  23. Incidence of ≥50% increase in serum creatinine

    Percentage of patients with ≥50% increase in serum creatinine from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline to day 3

Other outcomes

  1. Length of hospital stay

    Duration of index hospitalization (days).

    Time frame: From emergency department admission until hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  2. In-hospital mortality

    Death from any cause during index hospitalization.

    Time frame: From emergency department admission until hospital discharge, assessed up to 90 days

  3. All-cause mortality

    Time to death from any cause.

    Time frame: From study inclusion until death from any cause, assessed up to 90 days

  4. Cardiovascular mortality

    Time to cardiovascular death.

    Time frame: From study inclusion until cardiovascular death, assessed up to 90 days

  5. All-cause rehospitalization

    Time to first rehospitalization for any cause.

    Time frame: From hospital discharge until first rehospitalization for any cause, assessed up to 90 days after study inclusion

  6. Heart failure rehospitalization

    Time to first rehospitalization for heart failure.

    Time frame: From hospital discharge until first rehospitalization for heart failure, assessed up to 90 days after study inclusion

  7. Composite of all-cause mortality or all-cause rehospitalization

    Time to first occurrence of all-cause death or all-cause rehospitalization.

    Time frame: From study inclusion until the first occurrence of any component event, assessed up to 90 days

  8. Composite of cardiovascular mortality or heart failure rehospitalization

    Time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death or heart failure rehospitalization.

    Time frame: From study inclusion until the first occurrence of any component event, assessed up to 90 days

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2024 to primary completion in Sep 2026, 30 months.

Of 164 non-industry phase 4 interventional studies under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 56. This study's 30 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 183 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 56.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartActual
Mar 11, 2024
Primary completionActual
Sep 29, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 2026
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07926958
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Mar 11, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 29, 2026
Completion
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Pedro M. Marques, MD
principal investigator · Unidade Local de Saúde São João, Oporto

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Acetazolamide · Dapagliflozin · Empagliflozin

Start the discussion