ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07925047Updated Nov 9, 2026

Individualized Temporal Interference Stimulation for Reward Processing in Late-Life Depression

An interventional study of Active Temporal Interference Stimulation and Sham Temporal Interference Stimulation in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD, sponsored by Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to investigate the effects and neural mechanisms of individualized temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens in older adults with depression. A total of 70 participants aged 60-80 years will be randomly assigned to receive active TI or sham stimulation. Clinical and cognitive assessments, a probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task, MRI, and TMS-EEG will be used to evaluate changes in depressive symptoms, reward processing, and brain activity. Clinical and cognitive follow-up assessments will be conducted at 1 and 4 weeks after the intervention.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, parallel-group study involving 70 adults aged 60-80 years who meet DSM-5 criteria for a current episode of major depressive disorder and have at least moderate depressive symptoms.

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to an active TI group (n=35) or a sham stimulation group (n=35). Individualized TI will target the left nucleus accumbens, with stimulation administered for approximately 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

Clinical and neuropsychological assessments will evaluate depressive symptoms, anxiety, anhedonia, sleep, and cognitive function. A probabilistic reversal learning (PRL) task will assess reward learning and cognitive flexibility. Structural MRI will support individualized stimulation planning, while resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) and TMS-EEG will be used to investigate changes in brain networks and neurophysiological activity.

Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after the intervention, with additional follow-ups at 1 and 4 weeks. The study will compare changes between groups and explore associations among clinical outcomes, reward processing, and neural measures.

02

Conditions studied

  • Major Depressive Disorder (MDD

Keywords

  • Late-Life Depression
  • Temporal Interference Stimulation
03

In context

Depressive Disorder, Major

3,041 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major; 588 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 70 is below the median of 79 across 2,530 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder, Major.

Browse Depressive Disorder, Major studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital is the lead sponsor of 22 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 60-80 years.
  • Meet the diagnostic criteria for a current episode of major depressive disorder (MDD).
  • Have at least moderate depressive symptoms.
  • Able to understand and comply with study procedures, provide written , and voluntarily participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of severe neurological disorders or epilepsy.
  • Severe or unstable medical conditions.
  • to MRI, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), or transcranial electrical stimulation.
  • Comorbid severe psychiatric disorders, such as bipolar disorder or schizophrenia.
  • Significant cognitive impairment that interferes with or completion of study procedures.
  • High suicide risk.
  • Any other medical or safety condition that, in the investigator's judgment, makes participation inappropriate.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
70 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active Temporal Interference Stimulation

    Participants will receive individualized active temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens, for 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

    Device: Active Temporal Interference Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Temporal Interference Stimulation

    Participants will receive sham temporal interference stimulation (TI) with similar electrode placement and procedures, following the same schedule as the active group (10 sessions over five days).

    Device: Sham Temporal Interference Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceActive Temporal Interference Stimulation

    Individualized active temporal interference stimulation (TI) targeting the left nucleus accumbens, delivered for 20 minutes per session, twice daily for five consecutive days (10 sessions in total).

  • DeviceSham Temporal Interference Stimulation

    Sham temporal interference stimulation (TI) with similar electrode placement and procedures, without sustained effective stimulation, following the same schedule as the active group (10 sessions over five days).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24)

    The 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24) assesses depressive symptom severity. Total scores range from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  2. Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS)

    Anhedonia will be assessed using the 14-item Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). Total scores range from 14 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anhedonia. Changes from baseline will be compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  3. Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) Task

    The PRL task assesses reward-based learning and cognitive flexibility. Participants learn from probabilistic feedback and adjust their choices when reward contingencies change. Task performance will be evaluated using behavioral measures of reward learning and reversal learning.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAMA)

    Anxiety severity will be assessed using the 14-item HAMA. Total scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  2. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) assesses sleep quality and disturbances. The global score, calculated from seven components, ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  3. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)

    Global cognitive function will be assessed using the MMSE. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive function.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  4. Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) Performance

    Verbal learning and memory will be evaluated using the numbers of correctly recalled words during immediate recall, delayed recall, category-cued recall, and recognition testing.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  5. Verbal Fluency Test (VF) Performance

    Verbal fluency will be assessed using the numbers of valid responses generated during animal naming, phonemic word generation, and action fluency tasks, each lasting one minute.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  6. 3D Confusion Assessment Method (3D-CAM)

    Delirium will be assessed using the 3-Minute Diagnostic Interview for CAM-Defined Delirium (3D-CAM). The outcome will be recorded as the presence or absence of delirium.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  7. Clock Drawing Test (CDT)

    Visuospatial and executive functioning will be assessed using a four-point Clock Drawing Test. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  8. Digit Span Test (DST) Performance

    Attention and working memory will be assessed using forward and backward digit span, including maximum correctly recalled span length and the number of correct sequences.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  9. Trail Making Test (TMT)

    Processing speed, attention, and executive functioning will be evaluated using completion time in seconds across the four TMT conditions in the study protocol. Errors will also be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  10. Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)

    The 12-domain Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) assesses neuropsychiatric symptoms. The total score is calculated by summing frequency × severity scores across 12 domains and ranges from 0 to 144, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  11. Activities of Daily Living (ADL)

    Daily functioning will be assessed using the 20-item ADL scale. Scores range from 20 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention, and at 1-week and 4-week follow-ups

  12. Resting-State fMRI Brain Network Measures

    Resting-state fMRI will be used to evaluate changes in nucleus accumbens-related functional connectivity and brain network characteristics following the intervention.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

  13. TMS-Evoked Global Mean Field Amplitude (GMFA)

    Global mean field amplitude (GMFA) will be calculated from TMS-evoked EEG recordings to quantify the overall cortical response to stimulation. Changes in GMFA amplitude will be assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

  14. TMS-EEG Time-Frequency Power

    Time-frequency analysis of TMS-EEG recordings will be used to assess changes in oscillatory power across frequency bands following stimulation.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

  15. TMS-EEG Functional Connectivity

    Functional connectivity will be assessed using TMS-EEG recordings to evaluate changes in the synchronization and interaction of cortical brain regions.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

  16. TMS-EEG Source-Localized Cortical Activity

    EEG source reconstruction will be used to estimate changes in TMS-evoked cortical activity at the source level.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

  17. TMS-Evoked Potential (TEP) Amplitude

    TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) will be analyzed to assess changes in cortical responses, including the amplitude of TMS-evoked EEG components.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately after the intervention

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to ethical restrictions (as they contain information that could compromise participant privacy), but will be available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request after completion of the study and approval by the ethics committee.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Oct 2027, 11 months later.

Of 647 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Depressive Disorder, Major, half reached primary completion within 35 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 55. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 687 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 55.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 24, 2026
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 10, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 30, 2027
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 9, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07925047
Lead sponsor
Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital
Responsible party
Xiang Yang Zhang (Professor, Beijing HuiLongGuan Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 9, 2026
Start date
Nov 10, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Dongmei Wang, Ph.D
Contact
wangdm@psych.ac.cn
+86 132 4190 1959
Xiangyang Zhang, Ph.D
principal investigator · Tsinghua University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion