ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07921797Updated Nov 6, 2026

Long-Term Performance of Kingstron X-LINK Compared With Commercial Bioprostheses

An observational study in AORTIC VALVE DISEASES and Mitral Valve Disease, sponsored by West China Hospital. Completed. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by West China Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
268
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the long term clinical performance of the Kingstron X LINK bioprosthesis for aortic or mitral valve replacement, and verify whether its postoperative outcomes are non inferior to commercially available Medtronic Mosaic and Edwards Perimount Magna bioprostheses. It will also assess safety, hemodynamic performance and patient quality of life after valve implantation. The main questions it aims to answer are: Does the Kingstron X LINK bioprosthesis yield non inferior long term overall survival compared with Medtronic and Edwards bioprostheses? What are the differences in structural valve degeneration, adverse events, reoperation free survival and hemodynamic outcomes between the Kingstron X LINK and the comparator bioprostheses? How does patient quality of life differ across the three bioprosthesis groups during long term follow up? Researchers will compare patients receiving Kingstron X LINK bioprostheses against those receiving Medtronic Mosaic or Edwards Perimount Magna bioprostheses, all of whom underwent surgical aortic and/or mitral valve replacement at West China Hospital.

Participants will: Receive surgical aortic valve replacement and/or mitral valve replacement with one of the three types of bioprosthetic valves. Complete annual clinical follow up including clinical examination, hemodynamic assessment and quality of life evaluation. Be monitored for adverse events, structural valve degeneration and reoperation events over long term follow up.

02

Conditions studied

  • AORTIC VALVE DISEASES
  • Mitral Valve Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Kingstrobio X-LINK bioprosthetic valve
  • aortic valve replacement
  • mitral valve replacement
  • hemodynamic performance
  • long-term follow-up
03

In context

Aortic Valve Disease

234 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Disease; 70 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 268 is above the median of 200 across 106 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Disease.

Browse Aortic Valve Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

West China Hospital is the lead sponsor of 501 studies on the registry; 246 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients receiving surgical aortic or mitral bioprosthetic valve replacement (Kingstron X-LINK, Medtronic or Edwards) at West China Hospital. Participants will be followed annually for up to 5 years after valve implantation for clinical, echocardiographic and safety assessments.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

- (1) Adults scheduled to undergo or undergoing primary surgical AVR with either a Kingstron X-LINK, Medtronic Mosaic, or Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis between November 2015 and August 2018.

(2) Adults scheduled to undergo or undergoing primary surgical MVR with a Kingstron X-LINK, Medtronic Mosaic, or Edwards Perimount Magna bioprosthesis during the same interval.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) Patients with active or suspected infective endocarditis at the time of valve surgery were excluded.

    (2) Patients who had previously undergone cardiac valve replacement surgery were excluded.

    (3) Patients who declined or were unable to provide written for study participation and annual follow-up were excluded.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
268 participants (actual)
Target follow-up
5 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Kingstron group

    Patients who received the Kingstron X-LINK bioprosthesis were assigned to the Kingstron group

  • Control group

    Patients who received Medtronic Mosaic or Edwards Perimount Magna bioprostheses were assigned to the control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. All-cause mortality at 5 years

    All-cause mortality defined as death from any cause, compared among patients receiving Kingstron X-LINK, Medtronic and Edwards bioprostheses

    Time frame: 5 years after valve implantation

  2. Freedom from severe structural valve degeneration (SVD) at 5 years

    Freedom from stage 3 structural valve degeneration (SVD) defined by VARC-3 criteria, compared across the three bioprosthesis groups

    Time frame: 5 years after valve implantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Reoperation-free survival at 5 years

    Freedom from reoperation for valve-related dysfunction, including surgical or transcatheter reintervention

    Time frame: 5 years after valve implantation

  2. Valve-related adverse events

    Composite of valve thrombosis, thromboembolic stroke, bleeding events, endocarditis, and non-structural valve deterioration

    Time frame: Up to 5 years after valve implantation

  3. Echocardiographic hemodynamic performance

    Mean transvalvular gradient and effective orifice area measured by transthoracic echocardiography

    Time frame: 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years after implantation

  4. Health-related quality of life

    Patient quality of life assessed by validated questionnaires

    Time frame: 5 years after implantation

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2015 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 97 months.

Of 47 non-industry observational studies under Aortic Valve Disease, half reached primary completion within 49 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 147. This study's 97 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 56 studies reached it within 49 months; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 97.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 2, 2026
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
StartActual
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07921797
Collaborators
KingstronBio Medical Technology Co. Ltd., Suzhou, China
Responsible party
Jiuhong Li (Dr., West China Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2015
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2023
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion