ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07921732Updated Nov 6, 2026

Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Phase III Trial of Biological Mesh for Alimentary Tract Reconstruction in Digestive Surgery

An interventional study of Biological Mesh for Digestive Surgery and Conventional Stapling in Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Anastomosis, Surgical and Postoperative Hemorrhage, sponsored by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2026, registered Nov 2026).
  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Updated Nov 6, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
144
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of the Phase III clinical trial is to evaluate whether using a biological mesh helps improve the efficacy and safety of alimentary tract reconstruction surgery. In digestive surgery, bleeding or leakage at the surgical connection (anastomosis) remains a significant clinical challenge. This study explores whether reinforcing the anastomosis with a biological mesh can effectively reduce these risks and significantly enhance the reliability of the surgical procedure.

The main objectives of this study are:

To evaluate the effectiveness of the biological mesh in reducing bleeding points at the surgical site during the procedure.

To assess the role of the mesh in lowering the risk of postoperative complications, such as anastomotic leaks or stenosis, within 90 days after surgery.

Study Groups:

Experimental Group: Participants who undergo alimentary tract reconstruction with biological mesh reinforcement during surgery.

Control Group: Participants who undergo conventional surgical procedures without the use of mesh.

Participant Flow:

Participants will undergo a health evaluation before surgery to confirm they meet the study criteria. Following the procedure, participants will receive standard postoperative care and return for follow-up clinic visits 30 and 90 days after surgery to monitor their recovery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Digestive System Surgical Procedures
  • Anastomosis, Surgical
  • Postoperative Hemorrhage
  • Anastomotic Leaks
03

In context

Postoperative Hemorrhage

135 studies on the registry are indexed under Postoperative Hemorrhage; 31 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 144 is above the median of 100 across 102 interventional studies indexed under Postoperative Hemorrhage.

Browse Postoperative Hemorrhage studies →

Lead sponsor

Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University is the lead sponsor of 490 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 18 to 75 years (inclusive).
  2. (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1.
  3. (ASA) physical status classification of Grade I, II, or III.
  4. Scheduled for laparoscopic or open surgery involving gastrointestinal-related anastomosis.
  5. Participants must meet the following laboratory criteria:

    1. (Hb) ≥ 90 g/L;
    2. White Blood Cell (WBC) count ≥ 3 × 10\^9/L and ≤ 12 × 10\^9/L;
    3. (PLT) count ≥ 100 × 10\^9/L;
    4. (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) ≤ 2 × (ULN);
    5. Total (T-Bil) ≤ 1.5 × ULN;
    6. Serum Creatinine (Cr) ≤ 1 × ULN;
    7. Serum Albumin ≥ 30 g/L.
  6. Able to understand and sign the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or lactating women, or women of with a positive pregnancy test.
  2. Patients with coagulation disorders.
  3. Severe liver disease (e.g., cirrhosis), kidney disease, respiratory disease, or uncontrolled chronic systemic diseases such as diabetes or hypertension.
  4. cardiac diseases, including congestive heart failure, symptomatic coronary artery disease, cardiac arrhythmias or hypertension poorly controlled by medication, myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or cardiac insufficiency.
  5. Presence of severe uncontrolled recurrent infections.
  6. Known allergy or to collagen or bovine-derived materials.
  7. Current participation in other clinical trials for drugs or medical devices that have not yet reached the primary endpoint time point.
  8. Any other medical condition (including follow-up and compliance issues) that, in the investigator's opinion, may or will interfere with the study process.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Hemoglobin (Hb)

The protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen. A low level is anaemia, which can cause tiredness and breathlessness. Measured in g/dL or g/L (9 g/dL is 90 g/L).

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
144 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group: Biological Mesh Reinforcement

    Participants in this group will undergo alimentary tract reconstruction using a linear stapler with biological mesh reinforcement. During the procedure, researchers will record intraoperative raw data, including the number of bleeding points per unit length within 10 minutes after stapling, among other related clinical indicators. Following the surgery, participants will receive standard postoperative care. A 90-day monitoring period will be conducted to track anastomotic-related complications, specifically focusing on postoperative bleeding, leakage, stenosis, and other related conditions.

    Device: Biological Mesh for Digestive Surgery

  • Active comparator
    Control Group: Conventional Stapling

    Participants in this group will undergo conventional alimentary tract reconstruction using a linear stapler alone. Identical intraoperative raw data regarding bleeding points and other related clinical indicators will be recorded for baseline comparison. Following the surgery, participants will receive standard postoperative care. Consistent with the experimental group, a 90-day monitoring period will track anastomotic-related complications, such as postoperative bleeding, leakage, stenosis, and other related conditions.

    Procedure: Conventional Stapling

Interventions

  • DeviceBiological Mesh for Digestive Surgery

    A biological mesh specifically designed for reinforcement during alimentary tract reconstruction. It is used in conjunction with linear stapling devices during the surgical procedure to enhance the integrity of the anastomosis. The mesh provides mechanical support to the staple line, aiming to improve surgical outcomes by reducing intraoperative bleeding and the risk of postoperative complications, including leaks and stenosis, among other related conditions.

  • ProcedureConventional Stapling

    Participants will undergo conventional alimentary tract reconstruction using a linear stapler alone, without the use of reinforcing mesh.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of bleeding points per unit length

    The number of bleeding points on the staple line or anastomosis that require clinical hemostasis or suture reinforcement within 10 minutes after stapler firing, divided by the total length of the line. Observation sites include: gastric resection margins, duodenal closure margins, intestinal closure margins, gastrointestinal anastomosis, esophagogastric anastomosis, esophagojejunal anastomosis, enteroenteric anastomosis, and others.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (within 10 minutes after stapling)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of arterial pulsatile bleeding points per unit length

    The number of arterial pulsatile bleeding points per unit length on the staple line or anastomosis requiring clinical hemostasis within 10 minutes after firing. Observation sites are consistent with the primary outcome.

    Time frame: Intraoperatively (within 10 minutes after stapling)

  2. Time required for hemostatic management

    The total duration (in minutes) spent on performing additional hemostasis or reinforcement procedures for bleeding points at the anastomosis or staple line.

    Time frame: During the surgical procedure

  3. Total operative time

    The total duration of the surgery.

    Time frame: From the start of surgery to the end of surgery

  4. Incidence of anastomotic-related complications

    The percentage of participants experiencing complications specifically related to the surgical connection, including anastomotic bleeding, anastomotic leakage, and anastomotic stenosis.

    Time frame: Up to 90 days post-surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07921732
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 6, 2026
Start date
May 6, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Yanfeng Hu
Contact
yfenghu@qq.com
+86 13632494551

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion