ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07920497HARMONIAUpdated Nov 5, 2026

Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Adults in the Intensive Care Unit

An interventional study of Weighted-blanket and Attention Control: Standard Blanket and Usual Comfort Measures in Psychomotor Agitation and Critical Illness, sponsored by Anmed Health. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Anmed Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to learn whether weighted blankets help reduce agitation, such as restlessness or excessive movement, in adults in an intensive care unit (ICU). Researchers will compare a weighted blanket with a standard blanket and usual comfort measures. They will also examine safety and the use of medicines given as needed to manage agitation or anxiety.

After a three-patient pilot to test study procedures, 197 adults will be assigned by chance to one of two groups. One group will receive a weighted blanket, and the other will receive a standard blanket with usual comfort measures. Both groups will receive similar nursing attention and continue all needed medical care. Weighted blanket sessions may last 15 minutes to 2 hours, up to twice daily, with close monitoring.

Researchers will compare agitation before and after each session, with the main comparison at 1 hour. They will also examine vital signs, medicine use, safety events, time in the ICU, and days requiring a breathing machine. Participation may or may not improve comfort or agitation.

Read the detailed description

Project HARMONIA is a single-center, mixed-methods study conducted in medical/surgical, neuroscience, and cardiac intensive care units at AnMed Health. A three-patient feasibility pilot, with one patient from each participating ICU, will precede a randomized, attention-controlled clinical phase involving 200 adults.

Eligible patients are adults aged 18 years or older with a Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score of +1 to +3 who meet protocol eligibility requirements. Participants in the randomized phase will be assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the weighted blanket intervention or attention control, using block randomization stratified by ICU. Patients and bedside nurses will not be blinded to treatment assignment.

The intervention group will receive a weighted blanket selected according to the protocol's patient-weight categories. Sessions may last 15 minutes to 2 hours and occur up to twice in 24 hours. The attention-control group will receive a standard blanket, usual comfort measures, and comparable nursing attention and assessment timing. All clinically indicated treatments will continue in both groups.

RASS, heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate will be assessed at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours when sessions continue to those time points. The primary outcome is the change in RASS from baseline to 1 hour. Additional outcomes include as-needed sedative and anxiolytic medication administration, physiologic changes, intervention tolerance, adverse events, ICU length of stay, and ventilator days.

An embedded implementation evaluation will examine protocol adherence, feasibility, nurse satisfaction, and barriers and facilitators to use. Interviews with nurses, patients or family members, and physician champions will explore experiences and sustainability. Patient and family satisfaction will be evaluated if collected.

02

Conditions studied

  • Psychomotor Agitation
  • Critical Illness

Keywords

  • agitation
  • critical illness
  • nonpharmacologic intervention
  • deep pressure stimulation
  • richmond agitation-sedation scale
  • patient comfort
03

In context

Psychomotor Agitation

231 studies on the registry are indexed under Psychomotor Agitation; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 200 is above the median of 100 across 188 interventional studies indexed under Psychomotor Agitation.

Browse Psychomotor Agitation studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Anmed Health as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Admission to participating unit.
  • Baseline RAAS score +1 to +3.
  • Able to provide or have a legally authorized representative provide consent.
  • Clinically appropriate for blanket use as determined by the care team.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Open wounds or burns involving more than 20% body surface area or otherwise preventing safe application.
  • Claustrophobia or documented anxiety related to confined spaces.
  • Low muscle tone when to safe blanket use.
  • Inability to regulate temperature.
  • Orthopedic injury that makes blanket pressure inappropriate.
  • Limb restraints in use.
  • Anticipated ICU discharge within 24 hours.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Weighted Blanket

    Other: Weighted-blanket

  • Other
    Attention Control

    Other: Attention Control: Standard Blanket and Usual Comfort Measures

Interventions

  • OtherWeighted-blanket

    Participants will receive a protocol-selected, wipe-clean weighted blanket applied by a trained nurse for 15 minutes to 2 hours, as tolerated, up to twice daily, alongside usual ICU care. Physiologic monitoring will continue throughout use. RASS and vital signs will be assessed at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours when the session continues. PRN medication use, tolerance, and safety events will be recorded. The blanket will be removed immediately upon participant request, intolerance, safety concerns, or care-team direction.

  • OtherAttention Control: Standard Blanket and Usual Comfort Measures

    Participants will receive a standard, nonweighted blanket for warmth or comfort, regular repositioning, and usual comfort measures. Nursing attention and assessment timing will be comparable to those provided to the weighted blanket group. Agitation, measured using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS), and heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate will be assessed at baseline, 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours when the session continues to those time points. PRN sedative and anxiolytic medication use and safety events will be documented on the same schedule as the intervention group. Participants will not receive a weighted blanket during attention-control sessions. All clinically indicated care will continue without delay or restriction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) Score

    Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score from immediately before the study session to 1 hour after initiation of the weighted blanket or attention-control session. Change is calculated as the 1-hour score minus the baseline score and compared between groups. RASS scores range from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (combative), with 0 indicating alert and calm. Positive scores indicate increasing agitation, while negative scores indicate increasing sedation. A negative change indicates a shift toward less agitation or greater sedation and does not necessarily indicate clinical improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1 hour

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of PRN Anxiolytic or Sedative Administrations

    Number of as-needed (PRN) anxiolytic or sedative medication administrations recorded in the medication administration record during the 2 hours following the start of each weighted blanket or attention-control session. Medication name, dose, route, and administration time will be recorded.

    Time frame: Baseline and 2 hours

  2. Change in Heart Rate

    Change in heart rate, measured in beats per minute, from immediately before session initiation to each scheduled assessment. Change will be calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value and compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after initiation of each study session, when the session continues to those time points.

  3. Change in Systolic Blood Pressure

    Change in systolic blood pressure, measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg), from immediately before session initiation to each scheduled assessment. Change will be calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value and compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after initiation of each study session, when the session continues to those time points.

  4. Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure

    Change in diastolic blood pressure, measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg), from immediately before session initiation to each scheduled assessment. Change will be calculated as the follow-up value minus the baseline value and compared between groups.

    Time frame: Baseline and 30 minutes, 1 hour, and 2 hours after initiation of each study session, when the session continues to those time points.

  5. ICU Length of Stay

    Number of days from ICU admission until ICU discharge.

    Time frame: From ICU admission through ICU discharge, up to 30 days.

  6. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    Total number of days the participant receives invasive mechanical ventilation during the ICU stay.

    Time frame: From initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation until discontinuation of invasive mechanical ventilation, up to 30 days.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schenzel HA, Palmer AK, Shah NB, Lawson DK, Fischer KM, Lapid MI, DeFoster RE. Weighted Blankets for Agitation in Hospitalized Patients with Dementia: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Feb 26;14:e57264. doi: 10.2196/57264. PubMed 40009836 ↗
  • Dimas A, Lober A, Reeves R. Pilot Study of Weighted Blankets on Agitation. J Neurosci Nurs. 2025 Feb 1;57(1):37-40. doi: 10.1097/JNN.0000000000000799. Epub 2024 Nov 21. PubMed 39621814 ↗
  • Mendell LM. Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 12. PubMed 24334188 ↗
  • Lonn M, Odeus E. Outcome Measures in Evaluation of Weighted Blankets: A Scoping Review. Occup Ther Int. 2025 Feb 19;2025:3663534. doi: 10.1155/oti/3663534. eCollection 2025. PubMed 40018070 ↗
  • Lewis K, Balas MC, Stollings JL, McNett M, Girard TD, Chanques G, Kho ME, Pandharipande PP, Weinhouse GL, Brummel NE, Chlan LL, Cordoza M, Duby JJ, Gelinas C, Hall-Melnychuk EL, Krupp A, Louzon PR, Tate JA, Young B, Jennings R, Hines A, Ross C, Carayannopoulos KL, Aldrich JM. A Focused Update to the Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Pain, Anxiety, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility, and Sleep Disruption in Adult Patients in the ICU. Crit Care Med. 2025 Mar 1;53(3):e711-e727. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006574. Epub 2025 Feb 21. PubMed 39982143 ↗
  • Eron K, Kohnert L, Watters A, Logan C, Weisner-Rose M, Mehler PS. Weighted Blanket Use: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;74(2):7402205010p1-7402205010p14. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.037358. PubMed 32204779 ↗
  • Burk RS, Grap MJ, Munro CL, Schubert CM, Sessler CN. Agitation onset, frequency, and associated temporal factors in critically ill adults. Am J Crit Care. 2014 Jul;23(4):296-304. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2014186. PubMed 24986170 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with researchers outside the study team. To protect participant confidentiality, access to participant-level clinical data will remain restricted to authorized study personnel. Study findings will be disseminated in aggregate form through publications and presentations.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Oct 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Aug 2027, 10 months after the start.

Of 36 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Psychomotor Agitation, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 36 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 42.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 29, 2026
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
StartActual
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07920497
Lead sponsor
Anmed Health
Collaborators
American Association of Critical Care Nurses
Responsible party
Andrea Franks (Nurse Manager, Clinical & Nursing Research; Principal Investigator, Anmed Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 5, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion