An interventional study of Neuroforma virtual reality training and Conventional rehabilitation program in Stroke and Upper Extremity Paresis, sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.
Sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether adding virtual reality (VR) training to conventional rehabilitation improves arm movement in adults who had a stroke 6 to 24 months earlier, and whether VR training 5 days a week gives more benefit than VR training 2 days a week. The study will also measure three blood markers that may reflect brain and muscle adaptation (BDNF, irisin and S100B).
The main questions it aims to answer are:
Researchers will compare three groups: conventional rehabilitation alone, conventional rehabilitation plus VR training 2 days a week, and conventional rehabilitation plus VR training 5 days a week.
Participants will:
Background Upper-limb motor impairment persists in many people after stroke. Virtual reality (VR)-based training added to conventional rehabilitation can improve upper-limb function, but the amount (dose) of VR training needed and the biological processes that accompany recovery are unclear.
Design Prospective, single-center, randomized (1:1:1), assessor-blinded, three-arm, parallel-group dose-response trial in 72 adults 6 to 24 months after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke with moderate-to-severe upper-limb motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity [FMA-UE] motor score 15 to 50).
Randomization and blinding A computer-generated block randomization list will be prepared by an independent researcher who is not involved in recruitment, treatment or assessment; allocation will be concealed in sealed opaque envelopes. Participants and treating clinicians cannot be blinded. The outcome assessor, the laboratory staff performing the biomarker assays and the statistician will be unaware of group allocation.
Interventions (4 weeks) All participants receive conventional rehabilitation for 45 minutes per session, 5 days per week (neurodevelopmental approaches, functional upper-limb exercises, task-oriented training, stretching and strengthening). The low-dose VR group additionally receives 30-minute Neuroforma VR sessions 2 days per week (8 sessions), and the high-dose VR group 5 days per week (20 sessions). Scheduled therapy time is therefore 225, 285 and 375 minutes per week in the control, low-dose and high-dose groups. From week 4 to week 12, all participants follow the same standardized home exercise program. Adherence and adverse events, including cybersickness, are recorded daily during the intervention.
Assessments At baseline, week 4 (end of the intervention) and week 12 (8 weeks after the end of the intervention), the blinded assessor administers the FMA-UE, the Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT). Fasting venous blood is drawn between 08:00 and 10:00 at the same visits; serum is separated by centrifugation, stored at -80 °C and analyzed in batches with commercial ELISA kits for BDNF, irisin (FNDC5) and S100B.
Statistical analysis Analyses follow the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcome, change in FMA-UE from baseline to week 12, is compared between groups with a linear mixed-effects model for repeated measures (weeks 4 and 12) adjusted for baseline FMA-UE; pairwise group comparisons are Bonferroni-adjusted. Secondary clinical outcomes are analyzed in the same way. The sample size of 36 required for the primary outcome (repeated-measures ANOVA, group-by-time interaction, f = 0.25, alpha = 0.05, power = 0.80, correlation among repeated measures = 0.50) was increased to 72 to allow pairwise dose comparisons and exploratory biomarker analyses and to cover an expected attrition of 20%.
Exploratory analyses Biomarker outcomes are exploratory; no adjustment for multiple comparisons will be made, and results will be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Associations between changes in clinical scores and biomarker levels will be examined with correlation analysis. ROC analysis will assess whether biomarker changes identify participants who reach a clinically meaningful FMA-UE improvement (at least 5.25 points). A classification and regression tree (CART) model using baseline and week-4 clinical and biomarker data will be developed to predict treatment response and internally validated with 10-fold cross-validation; external validation is not part of this study. A model-based cost analysis will estimate the potential savings of response-guided treatment duration compared with a fixed 4-week program. These analyses are hypothesis-generating.
Funding Health Institutes of Türkiye (TÜSEB), project number 51841.
8,255 studies on the registry are indexed under Stroke; 2,056 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 49 across 6,024 interventional studies indexed under Stroke.
Browse Stroke studies →Kutahya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 219 studies on the registry; 50 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
MMSE and MoCA
Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Contraindication
A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Conventional rehabilitation, 45 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions): neurodevelopmental approaches, functional upper-limb exercises, task-oriented training, and stretching and strengthening exercises. From week 4 to week 12: standardized home exercise program. Intervention: Conventional rehabilitation program; Home exercise program
Other: Conventional rehabilitation program · Other: Home exercise program
Conventional rehabilitation as in the control arm plus Neuroforma virtual reality training, 30 minutes per session, 2 days per week for 4 weeks (8 sessions). From week 4 to week 12: the same standardized home exercise program. Intervention: Neuroforma virtual reality training; Conventional rehabilitation program; Home exercise program
Device: Neuroforma virtual reality training · Other: Conventional rehabilitation program · Other: Home exercise program
Conventional rehabilitation as in the control arm plus Neuroforma virtual reality training, 30 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 4 weeks (20 sessions). From week 4 to week 12: the same standardized home exercise program. Intervention: Neuroforma virtual reality training; Conventional rehabilitation program; Home exercise program
Device: Neuroforma virtual reality training · Other: Conventional rehabilitation program · Other: Home exercise program
Upper-limb training with the Neuroforma virtual reality system, 30 minutes per session: mirror-therapy modules with visual feedback, gamified cognitive-motor tasks requiring hand-arm coordination, and repetitive movement practice. Session duration is increased gradually at the start and shortened if cybersickness symptoms are severe.
45 minutes per session, 5 days per week for 4 weeks: neurodevelopmental approaches, functional upper-limb exercises, task-oriented training, and stretching and strengthening exercises.
Standardized home exercise program given to all participants from week 4 to week 12.
Change in Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) Motor Score From Baseline to Week 12
Upper-limb motor impairment measured with the motor domain of the FMA-UE (33 items scored 0 to 2; total 0 to 66, higher scores indicate better motor function), administered by an assessor blinded to group allocation. Change = week-12 score minus baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline and week 12 (8 weeks after the end of the 4-week intervention)
Change in FMA-UE Motor Score From Baseline to Week 4
FMA-UE motor domain (0 to 66; higher scores indicate better motor function), blinded assessor. Change = week-4 score minus baseline score.
Time frame: Baseline and week 4 (end of the intervention)
Change in Wolf Motor Function Test Functional Ability Scale (WMFT-FAS) Score
Quality of movement rated 0 to 5 on each of the 15 timed WMFT tasks (total 0 to 75; higher scores indicate better upper-limb function), blinded assessor.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in Wolf Motor Function Test Performance Time
Mean time in seconds to complete the 15 timed WMFT tasks (each task capped at 120 seconds); lower values indicate better performance. Blinded assessor.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
19 items in 4 subtests (grasp, grip, pinch, gross movement), each scored 0 to 3; total 0 to 57, higher scores indicate better upper-limb function. Blinded assessor.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Concentration (Exploratory)
Fasting venous blood drawn between 08:00 and 10:00; serum stored at -80 °C and measured in batches with a commercial ELISA kit by laboratory staff blinded to group allocation. Exploratory outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in Serum Irisin Concentration (Exploratory)
Fasting venous blood drawn between 08:00 and 10:00; serum stored at -80 °C and measured in batches with a commercial ELISA kit by laboratory staff blinded to group allocation. Exploratory outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Change in Serum S100B Concentration (Exploratory)
Fasting venous blood drawn between 08:00 and 10:00; serum stored at -80 °C and measured in batches with a commercial ELISA kit by laboratory staff blinded to group allocation. Exploratory outcome.
Time frame: Baseline, week 4 and week 12
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Including Cybersickness
Adverse events and cybersickness symptoms recorded daily during the 4-week intervention and at each follow-up visit.
Time frame: Baseline to week 12
Adherence to the Allocated Intervention
Percentage of scheduled conventional rehabilitation and VR sessions completed.
Time frame: Baseline to week 4
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in publications (baseline characteristics, FMA-UE, WMFT and ARAT scores, serum BDNF, irisin and S100B concentrations, and group allocation) will be shared upon reasonable request, together with a data dictionary.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form, Analytic code
Time frame: Beginning 6 months after publication of the primary results and ending 5 years after publication.
Access criteria: Requests from researchers with a methodologically sound proposal should be sent to the principal investigator. Data will be shared after approval by the Kütahya Health Sciences University Clinical Research Ethics Committee and under a data use agreement, in accordance with the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (No. 6698).
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Feb 2028, 14 months later.
Of 3,108 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Stroke, half reached primary completion within 23 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46. This study's planned 14 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 3,252 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 46.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Kutahya Health Sciences University →