ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07891117Updated Oct 23, 2026

Multi-Evaluation of Dental Abutments With Different Surfaces

An interventional study of Multi-unit Abutments Xeal™ with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC and Conventional titanium multi-unit abutments with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC in Edentulism, Dental Implant and Prosthetic Abutment, sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Kutahya Health Sciences University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Sep 2026; still recruiting 1 month later.
Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The placement of dental implants has been a routine procedure for the rehabilitation of fully or partially edentulous patients for nearly 40 years. Dental abutments are intermediary components that connect prosthetic teeth to the implants after healing. Depending on the properties of the abutment material, plaque accumulation and bacterial adhesion may lead to inflammation and bone loss in peri-implant tissues. Developed by Nobel Biocare, the Xeal™ abutment surface protects the underlying bone, supports stable soft tissue integration, and has been shown to reduce marginal bone loss and promote healthier mucosa compared to machined abutments. However, previous studies have mostly relied on clinical and radiographic evaluations, without three-dimensional evaluation or microbiological analysis. This study aimed to evaluate peri-implant marginal bone loss (MBL), digital evaluation of peri-implant soft tissue, and differences in the microbial composition of the oral microflora colonizing the soft tissue/abutment interface between Multi-unit Abutments Xeal™ and conventional titanium multi-unit abutments placed in the posterior region.

Read the detailed description

The study will include 44 patients (88 implants) with tooth loss in the maxillary or mandibular posterior region, for whom implant-supported fixed prostheses (supported by two implants each) are planned. These two-unit, splinted, implant-supported bridges will utilize two different types of abutments. Each implant will be randomly assigned to either the control group or the test group using the sealed-envelope method.

All patients will undergo the same surgical procedure and receive the same type of dental implant, in accordance with the established protocol. For the placement of both provisional and definitive fixed prostheses, multi-unit abutments with a "Xeal™" surface will be used for the test group, while titanium multi-unit abutments will be used for the control group.

Prior to surgery, clinical measurements will be recorded, and the peri-implant soft tissues will be digitally scanned using an intraoral scanner (IOS). For both abutment groups, the thickness and width of the keratinized mucosa, as well as the implant placement site, will be measured digitally with the aid of an intraoral scanner (IOS). Before and during the dental implant procedure, the bone thickness around the implant site-in the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual/palatal directions-and the height of the supracrestal tissue will be recorded.

The dental implants will be placed, and the multi-unit abutments will be tightened to the appropriate torque values. Primary and secondary stability values for the implants will be measured via the multi-unit abutments.

Subsequently, provisional fixed prostheses will be fabricated. After 3 months, the definitive prostheses will be constructed.

For the purpose of radiographic evaluation; Standard periapical radiographs will be taken postoperatively (Tb), immediately after prosthetic loading (T0), and at 1 month (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 1 year (T4). Marginal bone loss (MBL) will be assessed using measurements taken from these standard periapical radiographs with the aid of software throughout the one-year follow-up period. Following the surgery-at time points T0, T1, T2, T3, and T4-digital soft tissue assessment will be performed using an intraoral scanner (IOS), clinical parameters will be recorded, and subgingival microbial samples will be collected from the deepest pocket area of each implant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Edentulism
  • Dental Implant
  • Prosthetic Abutment

Keywords

  • edentulism
  • posterior region
  • screw-retained
  • digital
  • prosthetic abutment
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Kutahya Health Sciences University is the lead sponsor of 216 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age>18 years old
  2. Systemically healthy patients
  3. Presence of edentulous areas in the mandibular or maxillary posterior region
  4. Presence of natural teeth in the opposing arch
  5. Periodontal health
  6. Absence of oral or mucosal disease
  7. Presence of bone suitable for implant placement with a minimum diameter of 3.75 mm and height of 8 mm
  8. No need for simultaneous augmentation
  9. Two-unit splinted implant-supported prosthesis
  10. Prosthetic superstructure made of metal-supported porcelain-fused material
  11. A healed maxillary or mandibular molar or premolar site (>3 months) with sufficient bone available for implant placement without the need for bone grafting
  12. Not having used any antibiotics in the 6 months immediately preceding the surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Being outside the specified age range
  2. Systemic disease
  3. Patients who have received radiotherapy to the head and neck region
  4. Severe bruxism or clenching
  5. Patients who smoke more than 10 cigarettes per day
  6. Use of drugs that suppress the immune system or impair healing, use of steroids or bisphosphonates
  7. Patients with alcohol or substance dependence
  8. Patients who do not comply with treatment
  9. Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  10. Patients with intellectual retardation
  11. Untreated periodontal disease
  12. Use of any drug or device within the 6 months immediately before surgery
  13. Patients with conditions that could complicate surgical procedures/need advanced bone augmentation procedures
  14. Allergy to any component of the implant or abutment
  15. The need for bone or soft tissue reconstruction at the time of implant placement.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Control group

    According to the protocol, each patient will receive two Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CCs, with one implant being fitted with a Conventional titanium multi-unit abutment.

    Device: Conventional titanium multi-unit abutments with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC

  • Experimental
    Test group

    According to the protocol, each patient will receive two Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CCs, with one implant being fitted with a Multi-unit Abutments Xeal™.

    Device: Multi-unit Abutments Xeal™ with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC

Interventions

  • DeviceMulti-unit Abutments Xeal™ with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC

    All implant surgeries will be performed under local anesthesia. A midcrestal incision will be made with a 15C blade, followed by careful elevation of a full-thickness flap. Implant insertion will be carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions, and a Nobel TiUltra™ implant will be placed 0.5-1 mm subcrestally. Following implant placement, primary implant stability will be measured using the Osstell device. Non-engaging temporary abutment will be placed for fabrication of the temporary fixed prosthesis, which will be constructed approximately 1 mm infraocclusally. The flap will be closed primarily. After 12 weeks, the temporary prosthesis will be removed and secondary implant stability will be assessed with an Osstell device. Impressions will be taken at the abutment level, and a permanent metal-supported porcelain fixed prosthesis will be fabricated and screwed onto the Multi-unit Abutments Xeal™ with a torque of 15 Ncm.

  • DeviceConventional titanium multi-unit abutments with Nobel TiUltra™ implant Parallel CC

    All implant surgeries will be performed under local anesthesia. A midcrestal incision will be made with a 15C blade, followed by careful elevation of a full-thickness flap. Implant insertion will be carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions, and a Nobel TiUltra™ implant will be placed 0.5-1 mm subcrestally. Following implant placement, primary implant stability will be measured using the Osstell device. Non-engaging temporary abutment will be placed for fabrication of the temporary fixed prosthesis, which will be constructed approximately 1 mm infraocclusally. The flap will be closed primarily. After 12 weeks, the temporary prosthesis will be removed and secondary implant stability will be assessed with an Osstell device. Impressions will be taken at the abutment level, and a permanent metal-supported porcelain fixed prosthesis will be fabricated and screwed onto the Conventional titanium multi-unit abutments with a torque of 15 Ncm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. qPCR analysis outcomes of microbiological samples

    Microbiological composition will be the primary outcome measure, assessed at the T1-T4 time points up to 12 months after prosthesis loading

    Time frame: 12 month follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Marginal bone level changes (ΔMBL) (mm)

    Peri-implant ΔMBL (change in marginal bone loss) values during the period from T0 to T4 (from the time of prosthetic loading up to 12 months) post-loading on periapical radiographs.

    Time frame: 12 month follow-up

  2. Peri-implant keratinized width changes digitally (mm)

    Differences in keratinized gingival width measurements between time points T0 and T4 (from the time of prosthetic loading up to 12 months), as assessed via IOS, between the two groups

    Time frame: 12 month follow-up

  3. Implant stabilization values (ISQ)

    Primary and secondary stabilization values will be measured at intraoperation and follow-up 3rd months (before prosthetic loading)

    Time frame: At intraoperatively and before prosthetic loading session

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Kutahya Health Sciences University Faculty of Dentistry
    Kütahya, 43100, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Assoc. Prof. Dr. · Contact · berceste.guler@ksbu.edu.tr · 905059359207
    • Seyma Eken, Assist. Prof. Dr. · Contact · seyma.eken@ksbu.edu.tr · 905518489820
    • Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Assoc. Prof. Dr. · Principal investigator
    • Halil Ayyildiz, Assoc. Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Busra Terzioglu, Assist. Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Seyma Eken, Assist. Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Serpil Genc, Assist. Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    • Duygu Percin Renders, Prof. Dr. · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nobel Biocare. Data on file.
  • Bozkaya S, Uraz A, Guler B, Kahraman SA, Turhan Bal B. The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021 Jun;23(3):329-340. doi: 10.1111/cid.12999. Epub 2021 Apr 14. PubMed 33851765 ↗
  • Ainamo J, Bay I. Problems and proposals for recording gingivitis and plaque. Int Dent J. 1975 Dec;25(4):229-35. PubMed 1058834 ↗
  • O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972 Jan;43(1):38. doi: 10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38. No abstract available. PubMed 4500182 ↗
  • Mombelli A, van Oosten MA, Schurch E Jr, Land NP. The microbiota associated with successful or failing osseointegrated titanium implants. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1987 Dec;2(4):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302x.1987.tb00298.x. No abstract available. PubMed 3507627 ↗
  • Nosswitz M, Teale M, Mathes S, Venturato A, Gasser A. Evaluation of Anodized Surfaces Designed for Improved Soft Tissue Integration, Foundation for Oral Rehabilitation; 2019
  • Mussano F, Genova T, Laurenti M, Zicola E, Munaron L, Rivolo P, Mandracci P, Carossa S. Early Response of Fibroblasts and Epithelial Cells to Pink-Shaded Anodized Dental Implant Abutments: An In Vitro Study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018 May/Jun;33(3):571-579. doi: 10.11607/jomi.6479. PubMed 29763495 ↗
  • Stević, M., Tatić, Z., Biočanin, V., Đurić, D., & Đukić, I. (2021). History of implantology from the aspect of osseointegration and mucointegration. Timočki medicinski glasnik, 46(1), 29-36.
  • Te Lin Y, Li C, Korostoff J, Fiorellini JP, Yang J, Chang YC. Three-dimensional digital quantitative analysis of periodontal and peri-implant phenotype-A narrative review. Periodontol 2000. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1111/prd.12639. Online ahead of print. PubMed 40641458 ↗
  • Milleret V, Lienemann PS, Gasser A, Bauer S, Ehrbar M, Wennerberg A. Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Mar;21 Suppl 1:15-24. doi: 10.1111/cid.12736. Epub 2019 Feb 27. PubMed 30809940 ↗
  • Yılmaz HG, Yılmaz SK. Effect of Different Abutment Materials on Health of Peri-İmplant Tissues. EÜ Dişhek Fak Derg 2011; 32: 69-75.
  • Welander M, Abrahamsson I, Berglundh T. The mucosal barrier at implant abutments of different materials. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008 Jul;19(7):635-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01543.x. Epub 2008 May 19. PubMed 18492075 ↗
  • Linkevicius T, Vaitelis J. The effect of zirconia or titanium as abutment material on soft peri-implant tissues: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Sep;26 Suppl 11:139-47. doi: 10.1111/clr.12631. Epub 2015 Jun 13. PubMed 26073346 ↗
  • Singh, S., Saifi, D., Singhal, M. K., & Saxena, I. Rational Design and Characterization of Novel Dental Implant and Surfaces: Mucointegration with Enhanced Osseointegration

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2028, 21 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2026
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
StartActual
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891117
Collaborators
Nobel Biocare
Responsible party
Berceste Guler Ayyildiz (Assoc. Prof, Kutahya Health Sciences University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Study contacts

Berceste Guler Ayyildiz, Assoc. Prof. Dr.
Contact
berceste.guler@ksbu.edu.tr
905059359207
Seyma Eken, Assist. Prof. Dr.
Contact
seyma.eken@ksbu.edu.tr
905518489820
Berceste Guler Ayyildiz
study director · Kutahya Health Sciences University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion