An interventional study of Meta Quest 3 Headset and Conventional fire safety evacuation simulation in Participants' Psychomotor, Affective Attitudes and Fire-related Cognitive Abilities, sponsored by Universitas Indonesia. Completed at 1 site in Indonesia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 58 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.
Sponsored by Universitas Indonesia · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
The goal of this interventional study is to assess the effectiveness of safety and evacuation training VR simulation-based fire on personnel in hospitals. The main question it aims to answer is:
Are there significant differences in cognitive ability scores, participants' psychomotor, and affective attitudes towards fire safety and evacuation in hospitals between groups trained using virtual reality-based simulations and conventional simulations?
Users can use VR headsets to enter a realistic virtual world atmosphere that resembles a real-world fire disaster, in this case, using the environment in a Hospital. Unlike conventional training that often only focuses on the use of light fire extinguishers (APAR), the innovation we propose will create a scenario in 3 levels:
Becoming a first responder at level 1. Becoming a gathering point coordinator at level 2. Becoming a coordinator who reports to the emergency coordinator and emergency director at level 3.
The innovation product will be used as a treatment in the study. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of VR simulation-based fire safety and evacuation training on hospital personnel. The method used was an experimental research design with controlled randomization, comparing the values of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective abilities in groups given virtual reality-based simulations and conventional simulations. The research sample was hospital personnel, with a minimum of 72 samples selected through random sampling. This study's expected results prove that the simulation innovation product with VR effectively improves participants' skills and confidence in dealing with fires.
The expected target is that this innovation will allow hospital personnel to control fire disasters that occur at any time in the hospital.
Universitas Indonesia is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 13 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
In the VR group, treatment was given individually. Each subject performed a VR-based fire evacuation simulation at the Hospital using tools and programs that had been prepared by the team.
Device: Meta Quest 3 Headset
In conventional simulation group is considered as control group. Simulation is done in groups and consists of six subjects, each individual will get their respective roles.
Other: Conventional fire safety evacuation simulation
VR Code Red Evacuation Simulation
Code Red Evacuation simulation
Improvement of cognitive score
increase in the average difference in the pretest and posttest questionnaire scores for cognitive aspects. Scoring range is from 0-100, with higher score as better outcome.
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Improvement of affective score
increase in the average difference in the pretest and posttest questionnaire scores for affective aspects. Scoring range is from 0-100, with higher score as better outcome.
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Improvement of psychomotor score
increase in the average difference in the pretest and posttest questionnaire scores for psychomotor aspects. Scoring range is from 0-100, with higher score as better outcome.
Time frame: immediately after the intervention
Plan to share: No — Because this research only requires the results of the subject's questionnaire assessment.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Universitas Indonesia