ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07917208Updated Nov 9, 2026

Early Feasibility Study of the Capstan Medical TMVR System

An interventional study of Capstan Compass Robotic System for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement in Mitral Regurgitation (MR), sponsored by Capstan Medical. Recruiting at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-09.

Sponsored by Capstan Medical · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 9, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changed+1 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This early feasibility study is evaluating the safety and performance of the Capstan Compass Robotic System™ for transcatheter mitral valve replacement in patients with symptomatic, moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation who are unsuitable for surgical repair or transcatheter edge-to-edge repair.

02

Conditions studied

  • Mitral Regurgitation (MR)

Keywords

  • Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement
  • TMVR
  • Mitral Regurgitation
  • Capstan System
  • Structural Heart Disease
  • Mitral Valve Disease
03

In context

Mitral Valve Insufficiency

468 studies on the registry are indexed under Mitral Valve Insufficiency; 164 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 68 across 279 interventional studies indexed under Mitral Valve Insufficiency.

Browse Mitral Valve Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Capstan Medical is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years at the time of consent.
  2. Moderate-to-severe or severe mitral regurgitation.
  3. II or greater symptoms.
  4. The participant is considered to be at elevated, but not prohibitive, surgical risk for mitral valve replacement, as determined by the local multi-disciplinary heart team and/or a validated surgical risk assessment tool (e.g., STS PROM).
  5. The local multi-disciplinary heart team determines that surgical mitral valve replacement is not the preferred treatment option and that the participant is an appropriate candidate for treatment with the Capstan System.
  6. The local multi-disciplinary heart team determines that the participant is unsuitable for mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (mTEER) due to anatomical, technical, and/or clinical reasons.
  7. The local multi-disciplinary heart team deems heart failure management is optimized based on participant characteristics and applicable guidelines.
  8. Ability and willingness to provide written prior to any study related procedure(s)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. \< 25%
  2. Anatomic features unsuitable for the Capstan System.
  3. Inappropriate anatomy for femoral venous introduction and delivery of the Capstan System.
  4. Severe mitral stenosis.
  5. Untreated severe aortic or pulmonic valve disease (stenosis or regurgitation).
  6. Untreatable severe right ventricular dysfunction or severe tricuspid valve disease.
  7. Evidence of intracardiac thrombus, vegetation, or mass.
  8. Prior mitral valve intervention that would interfere with the appropriate placement of the Capstan Valve.
  9. Any cardiac or vascular procedure performed within 30 days prior to procedure.
  10. Myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to enrollment.
  11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implanted within 30 days of procedure.
  12. Active endocarditis, other ongoing infection requiring antibiotic therapy.
  13. Stroke or (TIA) within 30 days of procedure.
  14. Active peptic ulcer or active gastrointestinal bleeding.
  15. PASP > 70mmHg or PVR > 5 Wood units after vasodilator challenge.
  16. End-stage renal failure on dialysis or ≤ 25.
  17. Concurrent medical condition with a of less than 12 months.
  18. Participant is on the waiting list for a heart transplant or has had a prior heart transplant.
  19. Pregnant (participants of childbearing age are required to have a negative pregnancy test).
  20. Known allergy or to device materials (e.g. nitinol, PET), or a documented allergy to heparin, that cannot be adequately medicated; a history of HIT, or to required antithrombotic therapies.
  21. Contraindication to or inability to tolerate the protocol-required therapeutic anticoagulation regimen for the 6-months post-procedure period.
  22. Participant is contraindicated for transesophageal echocardiography (TEE).
  23. Any condition making it unlikely the patient will be able to complete all protocol procedures (including compliance with guideline directed medical therapy) and follow-up visits.
  24. Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support within 30 days of the procedure.
  25. untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  26. (COPD) on continuous O2 therapy.
  27. Refusal of blood products.
  28. Currently enrolled in any other pre-approval study (does not apply to long-term post-market studies unless these studies might clinically interfere with the current study endpoints (e.g., limit use of study-required medication, etc.)).
  29. Planned cardiac intervention in the next 12 months.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(11)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

TIA (transient ischaemic attack)

A “mini-stroke”: temporary stroke-like symptoms caused by reduced blood flow to part of the brain, spinal cord or eye, without signs of a new stroke on a scan.

Stroke symptoms need emergency care at once, even if they go away.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    TMVR

    Participants will undergo transcatheter mitral valve replacement

    Device: Capstan Compass Robotic System for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Interventions

  • DeviceCapstan Compass Robotic System for Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

    Capstan System includes the Capstan Mitral Valve

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Safety Endpoint

    Evaluate serious adverse events associated with the delivery and/or implantation of the device.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Successful insertion, delivery, deployment, and retrieval of the delivery catheter defined as the proportion of patients presented as n/N (%) with device successfully inserted, delivered, deployed, and retrieved as defined by MVARC.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

  3. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Successful deployment of the implant in the intended target location defined as the proportion of patients presented as n/N (%) with implant successfully deployed in the intended target location as defined by MVARC.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

  4. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Freedom from emergency surgery related to the investigational device or procedure based upon reported adverse events.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

  5. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Freedom from device- or procedure-related mortality based upon reported adverse events.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  6. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Freedom from emergency surgery related to the investigational device or procedure based upon reported adverse events.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  7. Primary Performance Endpoint

    Freedom from device- or procedure-related reintervention based upon reported adverse events.

    Time frame: 30 Days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Safety Endpoint

    Rate of hemolysis and hemolytic anemia from reported adverse events.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  2. Secondary Safety Endpoint

    Rate of anaphylactic reactions from reported adverse events.

    Time frame: 30 Days

  3. Secondary Performance Endpoint

    Reduction in mitral regurgitation grade from echo analysis.

    Time frame: Through 5 Years

  4. Secondary Performance Endpoint

    The degree of improvement in symptoms and Quality of Life as measured by NYHA functional class.

    Time frame: Through 5 Years

  5. Secondary Performance Endpoint

    The degree of improvement in symptoms and Quality of Life as measured by KCCQ-12.

    Time frame: Through 5 Years

  6. Secondary Performance Endpoint

    The degree of improvement in symptoms and Quality of Life as measured by 6MWT.

    Time frame: Through 5 Years

  7. Secondary Performance Endpoint

    Robotic Technical Success defined as the absence of manual conversion.

    Time frame: At the end of the procedure

07

Study locations

1 of 3 sites recruiting
08

Timeline

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Apr 2027, 5 months later.

Of 90 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Mitral Valve Insufficiency, half reached primary completion within 59 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 144. This study's planned 5 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 143 studies reached it within 56 months; a quarter within 25 and three quarters within 108.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 6, 2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 2026
Primary completionEst.
Apr 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2032
Last update
Nov 9, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 9, 2026
Sites
3 sites changed recruiting status (2 now not yet recruiting, 1 now recruiting)
Show 3 sites
  • Kaiser Permanente · San Francisco, United Statesno status→Not yet recruiting
  • The Christ Hospital · Cincinnati, United Statesno status→Recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Nashville, United Statesno status→Not yet recruiting
Nov 9, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • The Christ Hospital · Cincinnati, United StatesContact none listed→B•••@thechristhospital.com
Nov 9, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 9, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    3 sites changed recruiting status (2 now not yet recruiting, 1 now recruiting)
    Show 3 sites
    • Kaiser Permanente · San Francisco, United Statesno status→Not yet recruiting
    • The Christ Hospital · Cincinnati, United Statesno status→Recruiting
    • Vanderbilt University Medical Center · Nashville, United Statesno status→Not yet recruiting
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • The Christ Hospital · Cincinnati, United StatesContact none listed→B•••@thechristhospital.com
    + 1 other change: verification date
  2. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07917208
Lead sponsor
Capstan Medical
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 9, 2026

Study contacts

Courtney Elliott
Contact
courtney.elliott@capstanmedical.com
4087814445
Chrissy Hawley, MPH
Contact
chrissy.hawley@capstanmedical.com
8583449792

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion