ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07914751Updated Nov 4, 2026

Methadone Versus Standard of Care for Pain Control in Minimally Invasive Lung Resection Surgery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Methadone and Standard of Care in Pain Management, sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Wake Forest University Health Sciences · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 4, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to find out if methadone is more effective in controlling pain in patients presenting for minimally invasive lung resection surgery compared to the standard of care.

Read the detailed description

Emerging evidence suggests that long-acting opioids may provide more stable analgesia and reduce overall opioid requirements in the perioperative period. However, the role of methadone as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen in minimally invasive lung resection surgery has not been well-defined. This randomized controlled trial aims to address this gap by directly comparing methadone-based analgesia to standard of care in patients undergoing elective minimally invasive lung resection surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management

Keywords

  • minimally invasive
  • thoracic surgery
  • thoracic anesthesia
  • methadone
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Wake Forest University Health Sciences is the lead sponsor of 1,350 studies on the registry; 203 are open to participants now.

Of its 330 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 250 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Scheduled for minimally-invasive lung resection surgery (for example, wedge, lobe, segmentectomy, combination of aforementioned procedures)
  • Elective same day admission cases Exclusion Criteria
  • Daily use of >/= 60 MME for 1 month or greater
  • Weight \< 50 kg
  • Baseline oxygen requirement
  • Chronic Kidney Disease Stage 4 or 5
  • Diagnosis of cirrhosis or liver failure
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30%
  • Conversion to thoracotomy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Methadone

    Analgesia with methadone. Other analgesic medications may also be given.

    Drug: Methadone

  • Active comparator
    Standard of Care

    Patients in the standard of care group may receive any analgesic at discretion of the anesthesia team but may not receive methadone.

    Drug: Standard of Care

Interventions

  • intraoperative methadone 0.1mg/kg on induction, based on actual body weight, maximum of 10 mg

  • DrugStandard of Care

    any standard of care analgesic at discretion of the anesthesia team not including methadone

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Morphine Milligram Equivalents-24

    opioids received for the treatment of postoperative pain and converted to Morphine Milligram Equivalents equivalents between HR 0-24 during hospitalization

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 24

  2. Morphine Milligram Equivalents-48

    opioids received for the treatment of postoperative pain and converted to Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) between hour 24-48. If subjects have been discharged then only the available data will be used for conversion of MMEs.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 48

  3. Morphine Milligram Equivalents-72

    opioids received for the treatment of postoperative pain and converted to Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME) between hour 48-72. If subjects have been discharged then only the available data will be used for conversion of MMEs.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 72

  4. Pain Score

    Participants will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 24

  5. Pain Score

    Participants will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. If subjects have been discharged then only the available data will be used.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 48

  6. Pain Score

    Participants will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. If subjects have been discharged then only the available data will be used.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hour 72

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Satisfaction Score

    Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being completely dissatisfied and 10 being completely satisfied at hours 24, 48, and 72 (if not discharged )

    Time frame: Postoperative hours 24, 48, 72

  2. Number of Patients with Respiratory Complications

    Number of patients with documented respiratory complications- including hypoxia, reintubation, receiving naloxone, hypoventilation, acute renal failure, myocardial infarction, ileus, and mortality. Evaluated at timepoints of occurrence of 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 (or discharge)

    Time frame: Postoperative hour 24, 48, 72

  3. Pain Scores at Month 3 and Month 6

    Participants will rate their pain level on a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Postoperative Month 3 and Month 6

  4. Percentage of subjects with opioid use at Month 3 and Month 6

    participants will self report on phone contact the continued use of opioids for the treatment of residual surgical pain at 3 and 6 months postoperatively

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27157, United States
    + New studies here

    Other open studies at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist, Winston-Salem

    Open a list, then choose Watch this search to get new studies there in a weekly email.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 2028
Last update
Nov 4, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07914751
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 4, 2026
Start date
Dec 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Rohesh Fernando, MD
Contact
rohesh.fernando@wfusm.edu
336-716-4498
Lynnette Harris, BSN
Contact
lynnette.harris@advocatehealth.org
336-716-4498
Rohesh Fernando, MD
principal investigator · Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Methadone

Start the discussion