ClinicalTrials.gg
Active, not recruitingNCT07912073Updated Nov 3, 2026

Comparative Effects of Kinetic Control Training and Neural Mobilization in Lumbar Radiculopathy

An interventional study of kinetic control training with conventional physical therapy and Neural mobilization technique in Lumbar Radiculopathy, sponsored by University of Management and Technology Lahore. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 25 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by University of Management and Technology Lahore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
34
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
25 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Radiculopathy is a neuromusculoskeletal disorder characterized by compression or irritation of a spinal nerve root, resulting in pain, reduced range of motion, sensory disturbances, muscle weakness, and functional disability. It commonly affects the cervical and lumbar regions and can significantly impair daily activities and quality of life. Various physiotherapy interventions have been used to manage radiculopathy, including exercise therapy, manual therapy, neural mobilization, and motor control training. However, the most effective intervention for improving pain, mobility, and functional outcomes remains unclear, highlighting the need for further research.

Kinetic Control (KC) Training focus on identifying and correcting faulty movement patterns through motor control retraining and postural correction, thereby reducing mechanical stress on the affected structures. Neural Mobilization (NM) aims to restore the normal mobility and physiological function of neural tissues, decrease neural mechanosensitivity, and improve nerve movement within surrounding tissues.

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of Kinetic Control techniques and Neural Mobilization on pain, range of motion, and disability among patients with radiculopathy. The study will be conducted as a randomized clinical trial. Participants will be recruited using non-probability convenience sampling and will be randomly allocated into two groups. Group A will receive Kinetic Control s, while Group B will receive Neural Mobilization. Both groups will receive conventional physiotherapy treatment, including hot pack, TENS application for 20 minutes before intervention.

The treatment protocol will consist of 12 sessions over a period of 4 weeks. Outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, the 2nd week, and the 4th week. Pain intensity will be measured using the Numeric pain rating scale (NPRS), range of motion will be assessed using Bubble Inclinometer, and disability will be evaluated using the Revised Oswestry Disability Index (RODI) for lumbar radiculopathy. Data will be analyzed using SPSS version 24. The findings of this study may provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness of Kinetic Control training and Neural Mobilization technique in improving clinical outcomes among patients with radiculopathy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lumbar Radiculopathy

Keywords

  • low back pain
  • Kinetic control
  • Range of motion
  • Radiculopathy
03

In context

Radiculopathy

483 studies on the registry are indexed under Radiculopathy; 145 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 34 is below the median of 60 across 373 interventional studies indexed under Radiculopathy.

Browse Radiculopathy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Management and Technology Lahore is the lead sponsor of 39 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
25 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • o lumbar disc prolapses (mild to moderate posterior and postrolateral disc bulge at the levels of L4-L5/L5-S1). Proven clinically by the neurological examination and MR

    • Both genders.
    • Age of 25-50 year
    • Pain duration of more than three months
    • Participants with NPRS less than 7 score will be included(11)
    • Participants with RODI scale less than and equal to 30% score will be included(12)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • o Piriformis syndrome

    • Spinal tumors
    • Lumbar instability caused by structural problem (e.g., ligament tear or spondylolistheses),
    • History of any spinal surgery,
    • Auto-immune disorders,
    • Gynecological problems causing LBP in females (e.g., retroverted uterus or uterine congestion),
    • Psychological problems interfering with the patient understanding of the orders,
    • Renal problems
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
34 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    kinetic control training with conventional physical therapy

    For flexion control retraining, the patient is positioned in kneeling position with feet outside the bed. Then, he/she is asked to perform knees flexion over 90º with no flexion of the lumbar spine. Exercise is done for two consecutive minutes. The performed exercises in the session will be repeated as a home program, twice daily

    Other: kinetic control training with conventional physical therapy

  • Active comparator
    Neural mobilization technique with conventional physical therapy

    The therapist applied hip flexion with simultaneous dorsiflexion and planter flexion of the patient's foot. The sciatic neural glide is performed from 15º to 90º of hip flexion, 20-30 repetitions for 1-2 sets.

    Other: Neural mobilization technique

Interventions

  • Otherkinetic control training with conventional physical therapy

    For flexion control retraining, the patient is positioned in kneeling position with feet outside the bed. Then, he/she is asked to perform knees flexion over 90º with no flexion of the lumbar spine. Exercise is done for two consecutive minutes. The performed exercises in the session will be repeated as a home program, twice daily

  • OtherNeural mobilization technique

    The therapist applied hip flexion with simultaneous dorsiflexion and planter flexion of the patient's foot. The sciatic neural glide is performed from 15º to 90º of hip flexion, 20-30 repetitions for 1-2 sets.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain measured by Numeric Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Numeric Rating Scale (NPRS) is most frequently used instruments to measure pain intensity in low back pain (LBP).The 11-point numeric with 0 representing No pain, 1-3 representing Mild Pain (nagging, annoying, interfering little with ADLs), 4-6 representing Moderate Pains (interferes significantly with ADLs), 7-10 representing Sever Pain (disabling, unable to perform ADLs(13)

    Time frame: At baseline and after 6 weeks

  2. ROM MEASURED BY BUBBLE INCLINOMETER

    The spinous process of the 1st sacral vertebra and the 12th thoracic vertebra were considered as reference points for measuring the range of motion in bending forward and backward. The spinous process of the 12th thoracic vertebra was considered as reference point for measuring the range of motion of lumbar side flexion. Two bubble inclinometers were used simultaneously for measuring the lumbar range of motion when bending forward (in the standing position), and one bubble inclinometer for measuring the lumbar range of motion for back extension (in the standing) and side flexion (in the standing position).

    Time frame: At baseline and after 6 weeks

  3. DISABILITY MEASURED WITH REVISED OSWESTERY DISABILITY INDEX (RODQ)

    The Oswestry Disability Index (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire) is an extremely important tool that researchers and disability evaluators use to measure a patient's permanent functional disability. The test is considered the 'gold standard' of low back functional outcome tools. This scale contain question related to functional activities of pain intensity, personal care, lifting, walking, sitting, standing, sleeping, sex life, social life and travelling. For patients understanding, URDU version is used. Interpretation of scale are 0% to 20% for minimal disability, 21% to 40% for moderate disability, 41 % to 60 % for severe disability 61% to 80 % for crippled and 81 % to 100 %.(14)

    Time frame: At baseline and after 6 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — The results data collected , de-identified individual participant data will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: 6 months after the publication of the manuscript.

Access criteria: The data can be requested from the corresponding author.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07912073
Lead sponsor
University of Management and Technology Lahore
Responsible party
Nosheen Manzoor (Assistant Professor, University of Management and Technology Lahore) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Oct 23, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion