ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07911930Updated Nov 3, 2026

LacriFill Canalicular Occlusion for Dry Eye After LASIK

An interventional study of LacriFill Canalicular Filler in Dry Eye Syndrome, sponsored by Mann Eye Institute. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 39 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Mann Eye Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Updated Nov 3, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 39 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a single-site, prospective, randomized (2:1) controlled study of subjects aged 18-39 who are candidates for bilateral LASIK and have dry eye symptoms (OSDI ≥13). The LacriFill group (n=50) receives bilateral lower canalicular LacriFill placement within 7 days prior to surgery plus standard postoperative care; the control group (n=25) receives standard postoperative care only. The primary outcome is the change in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score from baseline to 3 months after bilateral LASIK.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Syndrome

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,366 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 207 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 60 across 1,129 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Mann Eye Institute is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 39 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age 18-39 years. Bilateral LASIK candidate. OSDI ≥13. BCDVA 20/20 or better. Discontinue soft contact lenses within 5 days of surgery and RGP lenses 4 weeks prior.

Able to complete study visits.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Previous ocular surgery. Keratoconus or ectasia. disease. Pregnancy. Uncontrolled diabetes. Significant ocular surface disease unrelated to LASIK. Active ocular infection or inflammation.

The principal investigator reserves the right to declare a patient ineligible or non-evaluable based on medical evidence that indicates they are unsuitable for the trial.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LacriFill Group

    Standard postoperative LASIK care plus bilateral lower canalicular LacriFill placement within 7 days prior to surgery (n=50).

    Device: LacriFill Canalicular Filler

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Standard postoperative LASIK care only; no punctal plugs, LacriFill, or other canalicular occlusion before completion of the primary 3-month endpoint unless medically necessary as rescue therapy (n=25).

Interventions

  • DeviceLacriFill Canalicular Filler

    LacriFill, a crosslinked hyaluronic acid-based bioresorbable gel, instilled for bilateral lower canalicular occlusion within 7 days prior to LASIK surgery.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score

    The OSDI© is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability. The index demonstrates sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between normal subjects and patients with dry eye disease. The OSDI© is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring dry eye disease (normal, mild to moderate, and severe) and effect on vision-related function.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from baseline in Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score

    The OSDI© is assessed on a scale of 0 to 100, with higher scores representing greater disability. The index demonstrates sensitivity and specificity in distinguishing between normal subjects and patients with dry eye disease. The OSDI© is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring dry eye disease (normal, mild to moderate, and severe) and effect on vision-related function.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Proportion of subjects achieving ≥10-point improvement in OSDI score

    Proportion of subjects achieving an improvement of 10 points or more in OSDI score from baseline following bilateral LASIK.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Proportion of subjects achieving OSDI score <13

    Proportion of subjects with an OSDI score below 13 (normal range) at the 12-week postoperative visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Change from baseline in tear break-up time (TBUT)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (National Eye Institute Corneal Staining Scale)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  7. Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA)

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  8. Manifest refraction

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  9. Artificial tear usage and time to discontinuation of routine artificial tears

    Artificial tear usage, time to discontinuation of routine artificial tears, and requirement for rescue dry eye therapy through the 12-week postoperative visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  10. Requirement for rescue dry eye therapy

    Incidence and documentation (indication, timing, treatment administered) of rescue dry eye therapy through the 12-week postoperative visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. PROWL-SS Questionnaire

    PROWL-SS can be used to assess satisfaction with vision and the existence, bothersomeness and impact on usual activities in the last 7 days of four visual symptoms - double images (8 items), glare (8 items), halos (8 items) and starbursts (8 items). Subjects select one of 6 responses for each question. Responses are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 being a worse overall outcome and 100 being a better overall outcome for the existence, bothersomeness and impact on usual activities in the last 7 days of four visual symptoms - double images (8 items), glare (8 items), halos (8 items) and starbursts (8 items).

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Change from baseline in iTrace Corneal Performance Index (CPI)

    Objective optical quality measure assessed at baseline and12-week postoperative visit.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 12 months later.

Of 199 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Dry Eye Syndromes, half reached primary completion within 12 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 25. This study's planned 12 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 312 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 4 and three quarters within 18.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 27, 2026
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 9, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
Last update
Nov 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07911930
Lead sponsor
Mann Eye Institute
Collaborators
Sengi
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Dec 9, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Melissa Hamann Wright, Study Staff
Contact
Melissa.Wright@manneye.com
713-580-2500 ext. 2389
Phillip Brunson, OD
principal investigator · Mann Eye Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion