ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07908264PREMANEUpdated Nov 2, 2026

PREcision MApping and NEuromodulation After Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The PREMANE Trial

An interventional study of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage, sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore. Recruiting at 2 sites in Singapore. Open to participants aged 21 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-02.

Sponsored by National University Hospital, Singapore · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Updated Nov 2, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating form of stroke accounting for approximately 10-15% of all strokes globally. There is increasing evidence of younger working-age adults suffering from small-to-moderate sized spontaneous ICH, who develop significant motor and cognitive impairment after the event. These impairments contribute substantially to post-stroke functional morbidity and poor recovery, increasing care needs and decreasing economic productivity.

Existing neuromodulation trials in stroke rehabilitation have applied transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) at fixed anatomical targets using group-level brain maps, which overlooks the substantial inter-individual variability in the spatial topography of functional brain networks after ICH. Precision functional mapping techniques have demonstrated that individual-specific brain networks can be estimated using densely sampled resting-state functional MRI (rs-fMRI) data and multi-session hierarchical Bayesian models (MS-HBM). These individual-specific networks can identify personalised neuromodulation targets for navigated TMS (nTMS) to improve rehabilitation outcomes.

Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation (iTBS) to the primary motor cortex (M1) has been shown to alter functional connectivity in a dose-dependent manner, while iTBS to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) improves attention and memory after left-hemispheric stroke. Precision neuromodulation using nTMS targeting individual-specific functional M1 and DLPFC areas for personalised stroke rehabilitation has yet to be sufficiently tested in high-quality clinical trials.

The PREMANE trial aims to use precision functional mapping in individual patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage to investigate inter-individual connectivity changes over time and after navigated neuromodulation to deliver personalised neurorehabilitation for patients with ICH.

Read the detailed description

The investigators designed a randomised cross-over pilot trial of sham nTMS first or active nTMS first three-months after ICH followed by crossover after a three-week washout period. The patient, investigator, technician, and outcome assessor will be blinded to the patient's allocation in the trial. Each nTMS protocol lasts for one week (15 sessions per week for a total 30 sessions). nTMS consist of either the sham arm or active arm. Individual-specific nTMS targets will be localised using our pipeline for estimating high-quality individual-specific networks using fMRI. Standard care rehabilitation will be provided to all participants of the trial during the study period. Primary outcomes pre- and post-stimulation are measured using the Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity Scale (FMA), Western Aphasia Battery (WAB), a detailed neuropsychological assessment that assess 6 cognitive sub-domains (cognition), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Trail Making Test (TMT) and Paired associates learning (PAL). Functional outcomes will be assessed at baseline, 3-months, before and after each nTMS protocol, 6-months, and 1-year follow up. Secondary outcomes are changes in functional connectivity of brain networks using precision functional mapping techniques before and after each nTMS protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Keywords

  • spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage
  • transcranial magnetic stimulation
03

In context

Lead sponsor

National University Hospital, Singapore is the lead sponsor of 453 studies on the registry; 98 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Aged 21 to 65 years old.
  2. A radiologically confirmed diagnosis of SICH on baseline CT-imaging
  3. Able to communicate in English (including patients with dysphasia and those who are unable to write)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hemorrhage related to trauma, tumor, ischemic stroke, vascular malformations, and other structural causes
  • Prior cognitive impairments
  • Pregnant women
  • Foreigners
  • FMA-UE score > 46
  • MoCA score > 25
  • Patients with history of seizures or an epileptic
  • Patients who have been diagnosed with or have a history of mental health conditions (any psychological disorders)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    Sham nTMS First

    Participants will be randomized into two groups to determine the sequence of intervention (active neuromodulation or sham stimulation first). Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated allocation sequence by an independent party not involved in outcome assessment. Sham stimulation will be provided by a sham coil. Active neuromodulation will be provided by an active coil. The active neuromodulation protocol utilizes intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The stimulation parameters include: * Intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold (RMT) * 3 sessions per day over 5 consecutive days * 1800 pulses per session

    Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

  • Experimental
    Active nTMS First

    Participants will be randomized into two groups to determine the sequence of intervention (active neuromodulation or sham stimulation first). Sham stimulation will be provided by a sham coil. Active neuromodulation will be provided by an active coil. The active neuromodulation protocol utilizes intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS). The stimulation parameters include: * Intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold (RMT) * 3 sessions per day over 5 consecutive days * 1800 pulses per session

    Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

    The trial intervention in this study is navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation (nTMS), a non-invasive neuromodulation technique used to modulate cortical activity. nTMS delivers focused magnetic pulses to targeted cortical regions, inducing electrical currents that can alter neuronal excitability and functional connectivity. In this study, stimulation targets will be individualized based on precision functional mapping derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The intervention will be delivered using an established intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) protocol. Stimulation parameters will include an intensity of 90% of resting motor threshold (RMT), with multiple sessions administered per day over a defined treatment period. nTMS has a well-established safety profile when delivered within recommended guidelines. Common side effects include mild headache or scalp discomfort, while serious adverse events such as seizures are rare.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Fugl-Meyer Assessment: Upper Extremity

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  2. Montreal cognitive assessment score (MoCA)

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  3. Western Aphasia Battery

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes

  1. Paired Associates Learning

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  2. Trail Making Test

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  3. Changes in functional connectivity

    Time frame: Immediately after the intervention

  4. All functional outcomes

    Time frame: 6 months after the intervention

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Hofmeijer J, Ham F, Kwakkel G. Evidence of rTMS for Motor or Cognitive Stroke Recovery: Hype or Hope? Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2500-2511. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043159. Epub 2023 Sep 25. PubMed 37747964 ↗
  • Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A; Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009 Dec;120(12):2008-2039. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. Epub 2009 Oct 14. PubMed 19833552 ↗
  • Kim WS, Paik NJ. Safety Review for Clinical Application of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Brain Neurorehabil. 2021 Mar 18;14(1):e6. doi: 10.12786/bn.2021.14.e6. eCollection 2021 Mar. PubMed 36742107 ↗
  • Rossi S, Antal A, Bestmann S, Bikson M, Brewer C, Brockmoller J, Carpenter LL, Cincotta M, Chen R, Daskalakis JD, Di Lazzaro V, Fox MD, George MS, Gilbert D, Kimiskidis VK, Koch G, Ilmoniemi RJ, Lefaucheur JP, Leocani L, Lisanby SH, Miniussi C, Padberg F, Pascual-Leone A, Paulus W, Peterchev AV, Quartarone A, Rotenberg A, Rothwell J, Rossini PM, Santarnecchi E, Shafi MM, Siebner HR, Ugawa Y, Wassermann EM, Zangen A, Ziemann U, Hallett M; basis of this article began with a Consensus Statement from the IFCN Workshop on "Present, Future of TMS: Safety, Ethical Guidelines", Siena, October 17-20, 2018, updating through April 2020. Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jan;132(1):269-306. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2020.10.003. Epub 2020 Oct 24. PubMed 33243615 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — IPD may be shared upon reasonable request, data security policy, and research collaboration agreements are in place.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 10, 2026
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
StartActual
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2028
Last update
Nov 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Nov 2, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 2, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07908264
Collaborators
Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, National University of Singapore, Alexandra Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 2, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 2, 2026

Study contacts

Mervyn JR Lim
Contact
mervynlim@u.nus.edu
+65 6908 2222 ext. +65
Mervyn JR Lim
principal investigator · National University Hospital, Singapore

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion