ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07901998Updated Oct 28, 2026

Optimization of Two-Indicator Screening Protocol for Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease at High Altitude

An observational study in Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease, sponsored by Children's Hospital of Fudan University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 6 Hours to 72 Hours, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Children's Hospital of Fudan University · Observational

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,300
Ages
6 Hours to 72 Hours
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective observational screening study. First, researchers will optimize a two-indicator screening protocol for neonatal congenital heart disease (NCHD) adapted to high-altitude regions and evaluate its screening accuracy. Second, researchers will compare the screening performance between the intelligent screening device and the optimized conventional manual screening, to preliminarily explore the value of this intelligent screening tool at high altitude. Finally, researchers will use descriptive qualitative research to deeply understand nurses' real-world experience, operational barriers and training needs when using the plainland two-indicator protocol, the optimized high-altitude two-indicator protocol, and the intelligent screening device in high-altitude settings. Echocardiography will be used as the reference gold standard.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neonatal Congenital Heart Disease

Keywords

  • high altitude
  • congenital heart disease
  • newborn screening
03

In context

Altitude Sickness

216 studies on the registry are indexed under Altitude Sickness; 46 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 6,300 is above the median of 126 across 35 observational studies indexed under Altitude Sickness.

Browse Altitude Sickness studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospital of Fudan University is the lead sponsor of 268 studies on the registry; 95 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Hours to 72 Hours
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Live-born newborns delivered consecutively at collaborative high-altitude hospitals . Eligible infants are aged 6-72 hours after birth, with stable vital signs. Mothers have resided in the high-altitude region for at least 6 months during pregnancy. Guardians provide written informed consent.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Live-born newborns delivered consecutively at the collaborative hospitals
  • Postnatal age between 6 hours and 72 hours
  • Stable respiration, ruddy complexion and normal muscle tone
  • The newborn's mother has resided in the corresponding high-altitude area for at least 6 months during pregnancy
  • The newborn's legal guardians are fully informed, voluntarily participate and sign written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prenatally diagnosed congenital heart disease
  • Confirmed congenital heart disease by echocardiography performed after birth for any reason
  • Critical conditions that affect blood oxygen saturation, including severe respiratory disease, severe infection, severe asphyxia
  • Newborns receiving oxygen therapy or mechanical ventilation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
6,300 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • High-altitude newborn cohort

    Newborn infants born in high-altitude regions. All participants receive routine congenital heart disease screening. Clinical data and screening results are collected for observational analysis. No experimental intervention is applied.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity and specificity of the optimized dual-indicator neonatal congenital heart disease screening protocol

    Sensitivity and specificity of the high-altitude optimized dual-indicator screening protocol for neonatal congenital heart disease, with echocardiography as the reference gold standard.

    Time frame: 6 to 72 hours after birth

Secondary outcomes

  1. False positive rate of the optimized dual-indicator screening protocol

    False positive rate of the high-altitude optimized dual-indicator screening protocol for neonatal congenital heart disease, confirmed by echocardiography as gold standard.

    Time frame: 6 to 72 hours after birth

  2. Positive predictive value (PPV) of the optimized dual-indicator screening protocol

    Positive predictive value of the high-altitude optimized dual-indicator screening protocol for neonatal congenital heart disease, confirmed by echocardiography.

    Time frame: 6 to 72 hours after birth

  3. Sensitivity and specificity of the intelligent screening device

    Sensitivity and specificity of the intelligent screening device for neonatal congenital heart disease screening in high-altitude regions, with echocardiography as reference standard.

    Time frame: 6 to 72 hours after birth

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Researchers have not yet determined the plan for sharing individual participant data. The decision will be made after study completion, considering participant privacy protection, ethical requirements, and relevant institutional regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07901998
Collaborators
Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Study contacts

lifeng Yang, Phd candidate
Contact
174607369@qq.com
15209365882
xiaojing Hu, PhD
principal investigator · Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200032

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion