ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07900295Updated Oct 28, 2026

Effect of Added Load on Map-Based Proprioceptive Training in Chronic Neck Pain

An interventional study of Weightless map-based proprioceptive training and Weighted map-based proprioceptive training in Neck Pain and Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by Hacettepe University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by Hacettepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 years 9 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2023, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to find out whether adding an external load to a map-based cervical proprioceptive training program provides additional benefit for people with chronic neck pain. Adults aged 18-65 years with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to two groups: one group performed map-based proprioceptive training without load (weightless group) and the other group performed the same training with a 2 kg load secured to the head with a band (weighted group). The main question is whether the added load improves cervical joint position sense (repositioning error). Shoulder joint position sense, scapular position (Lateral Scapular Slide Test), neck awareness (Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire), neck disability (Neck Disability Index) and fear of movement (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia) were also assessed before and after the 8-week training period.

Read the detailed description

Chronic neck pain is associated with impaired cervical proprioception, which may contribute to altered movement control and persistence of symptoms. Map-based proprioceptive training, in which a laser pointer fixed to the forehead is used to trace simple and complex target patterns projected on a wall with head movements, is used to improve cervical sensorimotor control; however, it is not known whether adding an external load to this training enhances its effects.

In this single-center, parallel-group study conducted at Erciyes University Faculty of Sport Sciences, 30 adults with chronic neck pain were randomly allocated to a weighted group (n=15; training performed with a 2 kg load secured to the head with a band) or a weightless group (n=15; same training without load). Group allocation was performed by a person not involved in the assessments, and the outcome assessor was unaware of group allocation. Both groups trained 3 days per week for 8 weeks (about 30 minutes per session): approximately 10 minutes of map-based proprioceptive training followed by the same exercise program (neck isometric exercises, pectoral stretching, scapular and upper extremity stabilization exercises). The only difference between groups was the added load during proprioceptive training.

Outcomes were assessed at baseline and after the 8-week intervention: cervical joint position error (primary outcome), shoulder joint position sense, Lateral Scapular Slide Test (0, 45 and 90 degrees), Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire, Neck Disability Index and Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia. Within-group changes were analyzed with paired tests and between-group differences with tests on change scores and analysis of covariance adjusted for baseline values.

The study was approved by the Erciyes University Clinical Research Ethics Committee (decision no. 2022/600) and supported by TUBITAK 2209-A.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neck Pain
  • Chronic Neck Pain

Keywords

  • Proprioception
  • Joint Position Sense
  • Sensorimotor Training
  • Kinesiophobia
03

In context

Neck Pain

1,360 studies on the registry are indexed under Neck Pain; 299 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is below the median of 50 across 1,116 interventional studies indexed under Neck Pain.

Browse Neck Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Hacettepe University is the lead sponsor of 1,007 studies on the registry; 214 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Chronic neck pain for the last 3 months with an intensity of at least 2 on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
  • No neurological, orthopedic or traumatic neck/cervical complaint

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical surgery
  • Balance disorder of vestibular or central nervous system origin
  • Diagnosed rheumatologic/inflammatory disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Communication or cognitive limitation preventing compliance with the assessment protocol
  • Inability to attend the regular physiotherapy program throughout the study period
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Weightless Group

    Participants performed map-based cervical proprioceptive training without added load for 8 weeks.

    Other: Weightless map-based proprioceptive training

  • Experimental
    Weighted Group

    Participants performed the same map-based cervical proprioceptive training with an additional load secured to the head with a band for 8 weeks.

    Other: Weighted map-based proprioceptive training

Interventions

  • OtherWeightless map-based proprioceptive training

    Cervical proprioceptive training in which participants follow map/target patterns with head movements, performed without any added load, for 8 weeks.

  • OtherWeighted map-based proprioceptive training

    The same map-based cervical proprioceptive training program, performed with an additional load secured to the head with a band, for 8 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Cervical joint position error

    Cervical joint position sense assessed with the head repositioning (joint position error) test; the error between the starting and the reproduced head position is recorded. Lower values indicate better proprioception.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder joint position sense

    Shoulder joint position sense assessed as the repositioning error (degrees) between the target and the reproduced shoulder angle, measured bilaterally. Lower values indicate better proprioception.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  2. Lateral Scapular Slide Test (LSST)

    Distance (cm) between the inferior angle of the scapula and the nearest thoracic spinous process, measured bilaterally at 0, 45 and 90 degrees of shoulder abduction.

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  3. Fremantle Neck Awareness Questionnaire (FreNAQ)

    Self-reported body (neck) perception questionnaire with 9 items scored 0-4 (total 0-36); higher scores indicate more disturbed neck perception (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  4. Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    10-item questionnaire of neck pain-related disability, each item scored 0-5 (total 0-50); higher scores indicate greater disability (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

  5. Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)

    17-item questionnaire of fear of movement/re-injury, each item scored 1-4 (total 17-68); higher scores indicate greater kinesiophobia (worse outcome).

    Time frame: Baseline and 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Erciyes University Faculty of Sport Sciences
    Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly shared because participant consent did not cover public data sharing. De-identified data may be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2023 to primary completion in Jan 2024, 12 months.

Of 763 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Neck Pain, half reached primary completion within 7 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15. This study's 12 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 772 studies reached it within 7 months; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 15.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 21, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartActual
Jan 2, 2023
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2024
CompletionActual
Jan 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07900295
Collaborators
TC Erciyes University, The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, Yozgat Bozok University
Responsible party
Tuğba DERE (Assistant Professor, Bozok University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Jan 2, 2023
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2024
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion