ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07899944Updated Oct 28, 2026

Acupuncture Combined With Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome With Anxiety State

An interventional study of Acupuncture and Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation in IBS, Constipation Predominant and Anxiety State, sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-28.

Sponsored by The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study Title: Randomized Controlled Clinical Study on Acupuncture Combined with Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for Constipation-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome with Anxiety State.

This single-center, randomized, single-blinded sham-controlled trial enrolls adults aged 18-70 with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) and anxiety. All participants receive standardized weekly acupuncture for 4 weeks. Participants are randomly assigned 1:1 to either real daily home Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation(TEAS)at Zusanli acupoint or sham non-acupoint TEAS. The total study period lasts approximately 10 weeks, including 2-week screening, 4-week intervention and 4-week post-treatment follow-up.

The primary outcome is weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM) at week 4. Secondary outcomes cover anxiety, sleep quality, abdominal symptoms, quality of life and safety. Researchers will test whether adding real home-based TEAS to acupuncture improves bowel and emotional symptoms, and evaluate treatment safety and tolerability.

Read the detailed description

Constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C) is frequently accompanied by anxiety, which exacerbates gastrointestinal symptoms and reduces quality of life. This condition involves complex gut-brain interactions, including autonomic nervous system dysregulation and visceral hypersensitivity. Both acupuncture and Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation (TEAS) have shown potential in regulating gastrointestinal motility and emotional states. However, outpatient acupuncture alone often faces challenges such as interrupted treatment courses. This study aims to evaluate the synergistic effect, safety, and potential autonomic and microbiome mechanisms of combining standardized manual acupuncture with daily home-based TEAS for IBS-C patients with anxiety.

Common Acupuncture Treatment (Both Groups): All participants will receive standardized manual acupuncture once a week for 4 weeks. The acupoints include bilateral Tianshu (ST25), Shangjuxu (ST37), Zusanli (ST36), Sanyinjiao (SP6), Neiguan (PC6), Taichong (LR3), as well as Baihui (GV20) and Yintang (EX-HN3). Sterile disposable acupuncture needles (0.25×40mm) will be used. The needles will be manipulated to achieve "Deqi" (a sensation of soreness, numbness, distention, or heaviness), and retained for 30 minutes per session.

  • Experimental Group (Acupuncture + Real TEAS): Concurrently with acupuncture, participants will receive daily 1-hour home-based real TEAS applied to unilateral Zusanli (ST36). The stimulation parameters will be set at a frequency of 25 Hz, a pulse width of 0.5 ms, and an intermittent mode of 2 seconds on / 3 seconds off. The intensity will be adjusted to the maximum tolerable level that produces a distinct but painless stimulation sensation.
  • Sham Comparator Group (Acupuncture + Sham TEAS): Concurrently with acupuncture, participants will receive daily 1-hour home-based sham TEAS. The sham device, electrodes, and operational procedures will be identical in appearance to the real device. However, the stimulation will be applied to a non-acupoint site located 10 cm below and 2-4 cm lateral to ST36 (avoiding major meridians and neurovascular bundles). The intensity will be set to a perceptible surface stimulation, avoiding typical Deqi sensations or muscle contractions.
02

Conditions studied

  • IBS, Constipation Predominant
  • Anxiety State
03

In context

Ichthyosis Bullosa of Siemens

24 studies on the registry are indexed under Ichthyosis Bullosa of Siemens; 6 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 58 is below the median of 88 across 18 interventional studies indexed under Ichthyosis Bullosa of Siemens.

Browse Ichthyosis Bullosa of Siemens studies →

Lead sponsor

The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University is the lead sponsor of 40 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aged 18-70 years, with no restriction on gender.
  • Meeting the Rome V diagnostic criteria for IBS-C.
  • Stable constipation phenotype during the screening period; participants are expected to have fewer than 3 CSBMs per week, or be judged by the investigator to present constipation features consistent with IBS-C.
  • IBS-SSS score ≥ 175, indicating at least moderate IBS symptoms.
  • HADS-A score ≥ 8, indicating the presence of anxiety status.
  • Stable regimens of IBS-related medications, anxiolytic/antidepressant agents and other treatments that may affect gastrointestinal motility for at least 2 weeks prior to enrollment; participants are willing to avoid adding relevant new treatments during the study period.
  • Able to understand study procedures and willing to complete acupuncture treatment, home-based TEA/sham-TEA therapy, symptom diaries and follow-up assessments.
  • Voluntarily participate in the study and provide written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of organic diseases that could account for symptoms, including inflammatory bowel disease, colorectal neoplasm, intestinal obstruction, coeliac disease, uncontrolled thyroid disease, and diabetic autonomic neuropathy.
  • Presence of alarm features such as hematochezia, unexplained weight loss, anemia, fever, nocturnal symptoms, and family history of colorectal cancer without completion of necessary diagnostic work-up.
  • Previous major abdominal surgery that may significantly impair intestinal function.
  • Severe mental disorders, bipolar disorder, psychotic symptoms, substance dependence, significant suicide risk, or conditions requiring immediate psychiatric intervention.
  • New initiation or dose adjustment of anxiolytics, antidepressants, antipsychotics, opioids, strong anticholinergic agents, prokinetics, or regular laxatives within 4 weeks prior to screening.
  • Implanted cardiac pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator or other implanted electronic devices, or presence of unstable arrhythmia.
  • Skin breakdown, infection, severe skin disease at TEA electrode sites, or allergy to electrode materials.
  • to acupuncture, such as severe coagulopathy, inability to tolerate acupuncture, or extremely high risk of acupuncture syncope.
  • Pregnancy, lactation, or planned pregnancy during the study period.
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the past 3 months.
  • Other conditions judged by the investigator to render the participant unsuitable for this study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental Arm

    Participants receive standardized acupuncture once weekly for 4 weeks, together with daily 1-hour Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for 4 weeks, with stimulation applied to unilateral ST36 (Zusanli).

    Procedure: Acupuncture · Device: Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham Comparator Arm

    Participants receive standardized acupuncture once weekly for 4 weeks, together with daily 1-hour sham Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation for 4 weeks, with stimulation applied to a non-acupoint site distant from ST36 (Zusanli) and not located along major meridians.

    Procedure: Acupuncture · Device: Sham Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation

Interventions

  • ProcedureAcupuncture

    Participants receive standardized acupuncture once weekly for 4 weeks.

  • DeviceTranscutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation

    Participants receive daily 1-hour stimulation for 4 weeks, with stimulation applied to unilateral ST36 (Zusanli).

  • DeviceSham Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation

    Participants receive daily 1-hour sham stimulation for 4 weeks, with stimulation applied to a non-acupoint site distant from ST36 (Zusanli) and not located along major meridians.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM)

    The number of complete spontaneous bowel movements recorded in the final observation week of intervention period.

    Time frame: Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) score

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  2. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) score at Week 5

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  3. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) score at Week 8

    Anxiety symptoms assessed using the Anxiety subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe anxiety symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  4. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale (HADS-D) score

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the 7-item Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  5. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Depression subscale (HADS-D) score at Week 8

    Depressive symptoms assessed using the 7-item Depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate more severe depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  6. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total score (HADS-Total)

    Total emotional status evaluated by the total score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, summing HADS-A and HADS-D subscale scores. Total score ranges from 0 to 42, higher scores indicate more severe emotional distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  7. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Total score (HADS-Total) at Week 8

    Total emotional status evaluated by the total score of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, summing HADS-A and HADS-D subscale scores. Total score ranges from 0 to 42, higher scores indicate more severe emotional distress.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  8. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total score

    Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  9. Change in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) total score at Week 8

    Sleep quality assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Total score ranges from 0 to 21; higher scores indicate poorer sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  10. Change in IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) total score

    Overall IBS-related symptoms assessed using the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS). Total score ranges from 0 to 500; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  11. Change in IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) total score at Week 8

    Overall IBS-related symptoms assessed using the IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS). Total score ranges from 0 to 500; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  12. Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) total score

    Quality of life assessed using the IBS-QOL. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  13. Change in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) total score at Week 8

    Quality of life assessed using the IBS-QOL. Total score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  14. Weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM) at week 5

    The number of complete spontaneous bowel movements recorded during the first week after the end of intervention

    Time frame: Week 5

  15. Weekly complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBM) at week 8

    The number of complete spontaneous bowel movements recorded during the first week after the end of intervention.

    Time frame: Week 8

  16. Weekly spontaneous bowel movements (SBM)

    The number of spontaneous bowel movements recorded during the first week after the end of intervention, without the use of laxatives.

    Time frame: Week 5

  17. Change in Stool consistency measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS)

    Stool consistency is assessed by the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale, with scores ranging from 1 (hard lumpy stool) to 7 (watery stool).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  18. Change in Stool consistency measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) at Week 5

    Description: Stool consistency is assessed by the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale, with scores ranging from 1 (hard lumpy stool) to 7 (watery stool).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  19. Change in Stool consistency measured by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) at Week 8

    Stool consistency is assessed by the 7-point Bristol Stool Form Scale, with scores ranging from 1 (hard lumpy stool) to 7 (watery stool).

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  20. Change in Abdominal pain/distension intensity measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Subject-reported intensity of abdominal pain and bloating, scored on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents the worst imaginable discomfort.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  21. Change in Abdominal pain/distension intensity measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 5

    Subject-reported intensity of abdominal pain and bloating, scored on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents the worst imaginable discomfort.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 5

  22. Change in Abdominal pain/distension intensity measured by a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Week 8

    Subject-reported intensity of abdominal pain and bloating, scored on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, 0 represents no discomfort and 10 represents the worst imaginable discomfort.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 8

  23. Number of participants with acupuncture-related adverse reactions

    Count of participants who experience acupuncture-related adverse reactions during the study period.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

  24. Number of participants with TEAS-related skin reactions

    Count of participants who develop TEAS-related skin reactions during the study period. TEAS = Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

  25. Number of participants with other adverse events

    Count of participants experiencing adverse events unrelated to acupuncture or TEAS.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

  26. Number of participants with serious adverse events

    Count of participants who experience serious adverse events throughout the study.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

  27. Acupuncture completion rate

    Proportion of participants who complete all scheduled acupuncture sessions.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

  28. TEAS/sham-TEAS completion rate

    Proportion of participants who complete the scheduled home TEAS or sham TEAS intervention.

    Time frame: from baseline to Week 4

Other outcomes

  1. Change in fecal gut microbiota composition assessed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing

    Change of fecal gut microbiota detected by 16S rRNA gene sequencing, including alpha-diversity, beta-diversity and taxa relative abundance. Calculated as Week 4 value minus baseline value.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  2. Change in Low Frequency (LF) power

    Autonomic nerve function was assessed by frequency-domain HRV parameter low frequency (LF), which mainly reflects combined sympathetic and parasympathetic activity. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter) or other valid ECG recording devices was used to collect continuous ECG data for HRV analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  3. Change in High Frequency (HF) power

    Autonomic nerve function was assessed by frequency-domain HRV parameter high frequency (HF), which mainly reflects parasympathetic activity. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter) or other valid ECG recording devices was used to collect continuous ECG data for HRV analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

  4. Change in LF/HF ratio

    The LF/HF ratio was calculated to represent the balance of the autonomic nervous system. Twenty-four-hour ambulatory electrocardiography (Holter) or other valid ECG recording devices was used to collect continuous ECG data for HRV analysis.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 4

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Dec 2027, 14 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 2028
Last update
Oct 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07899944
Lead sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2026
Start date
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 28, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion