CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06221111Updated May 22, 2026Results posted

Comparison of Rimegepant and Placebo for Pain in IBS

A Phase 2 interventional study of Rimegepant 75 MG [Nurtec] in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-22.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
39
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of rimegepant on abdominal pain scores in participants with non-constipation IBS.

Read the detailed description

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and, particularly, the pain component of IBS lack effective treatments. Antispasmodics, antidepressants and hypnotherapy have all been proposed for the treatment of pain. Their effectiveness in clinical practice is disappointing, despite meta-analyses suggesting efficacy. The study hypotheses are: that rimegepant will be safe, well-tolerated, and will improve abdominal pain in participants with non-constipation IBS. The primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of rimegepant on abdominal pain scores in participants with non-constipation IBS. Secondary aims of this study are:

  • 1: To describe the effect of rimegepant on rectal compliance in participants with IBS and chronic abdominal pain.
  • 2: To evaluate the effects of rimegepant on rectal sensation based on ascending method of limits and on graded rapid phasic distensions in participants with non-constipation IBS and chronic abdominal pain.
  • 3: To evaluate effects of rimegepant on overall colonic transit in participants with non-constipation IBS and chronic abdominal pain.
  • 4: To evaluate safety of rimegepant in participants with non-constipation IBS and chronic abdominal pain Methods: IBS-pain participants will be selected according to the Rome III criteria. Trial participants will continue to receive the same medical therapy throughout the baseline and treatment periods. The study design is a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of rimegepant at doses and route of administration approved by the FDA for the prophylaxis of migraine headache.

The trial period will consist of a two week run-in period, and 4 week treatment period. Participants will complete a daily diary regarding abdominal pain and stool consistency. They will also complete questionnaires studies of anxiety and depression and IBS-QOL.

An established and validated method using rectal barostat device will be used to measure rectal compliance and sensation. The standard scintigraphic method to measure colonic transit established in the Clinical Research Trials Unit (CRTU) at Mayo Clinic Rochester will be used to evaluate changes in colonic transit.

Anticipated results and Significance: Rimegepant, at doses and mode of administration approved by FDA for the prophylaxis of migraine headache, will be efficacious in the reduction of abdominal pain and rectal sensation in participants with non-constipation IBS and abdominal pain.

This study will provide an early signal of efficacy that may lead to future randomized, controlled trials.

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

  • pain, IBS, CGRP, rimegepant, antagonist
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 39 is below the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Twenty-four participants with non-constipation IBS and chronic abdominal pain will be recruited for enrollment. Participants will meet specific Rome III IBS diagnostic criteria.

Inclusion criteria

Inclusion criteria:

  • Participants will be 18-70 years of age.
  • Participants will have non-constipation IBS [that is IBS-D (diarrhea), IBS-M (mixed), or IBS-U (unspecified)] with chronic abdominal pain diagnosed in their medical records at Mayo Clinic with chronic pain documented for ≥ 3 months.
  • Participants will have subjective pain ratings of ≥ 30 on the 100 mm VAS during at least 7 consecutive days of the 2 week run-in period for enrollment.
  • Participants will be capable of providing informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Diagnosis of moderate-severe depression as per HADS ≥15;
  • Alcohol or illicit substance dependence or abuse in the past 12 months;
  • Dementia, unprovoked seizure history, seizure disorder;
  • Pregnancy (all women of childbearing potential will be required to have a negative pregnancy test prior to initiation, and will be on a highly effective method of contraception, as detailed in the consent form);
  • Significant change or increase in antidepressant or pain medications within the last four weeks; significant change in primary treatment interventions for pain in the past four weeks;
  • Medically unstable
  • Severe hepatic or renal impairment, such as baseline AST or ALT ≥ 2.5 X upper normal limit or end-stage renal disease with estimated glomerular filtration rate or creatinine clearance \<15mL/min. Although Rimegepant is rarely associated with abnormal circulating liver enzymes, we shall exclude patients with baseline AST or ALT greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal.
  • Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inhibitors and strong or moderate CYP3A4 inducers.
  • Participants who report nausea several times per week or daily on the baseline bowel disease questionnaire (question # 16) will be excluded from the study because of the low risk of nausea induced by the treatment which was estimated at approximately 3% for rimegepant compared to 1% for placebo.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
39 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    rimegepant

    * Rimegepant 75mg oral dissolving tablet (ODT) * Formulation and Dosing as FDA-approved for Migraine Prevention: 75 mg Every Other Day (EOD) for 4 weeks/30 days

    Drug: Rimegepant 75 MG [Nurtec]

  • Placebo comparator
    placebo

    Placebo ODT appearing identical to the experimental formulation and administered every other day for 4 weeks/30 days

    Drug: Rimegepant 75 MG [Nurtec]

Interventions

  • DrugRimegepant 75 MG [Nurtec]

    placebo controlled trial

    Also known as: placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Abdominal Pain Scores

    The change in daily abdominal pain scores will be assessed using the 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "no pain" on the left, and "worst possible pain" on the right. Participants will identify their pain level by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "No pain" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Bowel Movement Frequency

    The change in bowel movement frequency measured by the number of bowel movements a participant reported having each day from baseline through day 28.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

  2. Change in Rectal Compliance

    The change in rectal compliance threshold defined as the change in pressure at half maximum volume (Pr 1/2) measured using a rectal barostat device. The rectal barostat device is a rectal catheter with a polyethylene bag attached (length 22 cm; capacity 600 ml) that is inserted into the rectum and connected to a barostat. The bag is unfolded by inflation with 75 ml of air, followed by complete deflation. After a 10 minute recovery period, the pressure is increased from 0 mmHg in steps of 4 mmHg for 15 seconds per step until 20 mmHg is reached. The observed volume/maximum observed volume will be used to obtain a pressure corresponding to half the maximum observed volume. A calculation of the pressures corresponding to the volumes just above and just below the half maximum volume will provided the specific pressure (Pr 1/2) corresponding to one half of the maximum observed volume.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

  3. Change in Rectal Sensation Pain Threshold

    The change in rectal sensation pain threshold in response to the pressure in the balloon escalating from 0 mmHg to 44 mmHg at 4 mmHg stepwise increases measured using the 100-mm Visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranges from (unnoticeable) to (unbearable). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "unnoticeable" on the left, and "unbearable" on the right. Participants will identify their level of pain by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "unnoticeable" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse pain.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

  4. Change in Rectal Sensation Ratings in Response to 24 and 36 mmHg Distensions

    The change in rectal sensation ratings in response to 24 mmHg and 36 mmHg distensions measured using the 100-mm Visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranges from (unnoticeable) to (unbearable). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "unnoticeable" on the left, and "unbearable" on the right. Participants will identify their sensation of pain, urgency and gas levels by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "unnoticeable" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain, gas and urgency scores. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worsening sensation of pain, urgency and gas.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

  5. Gastric Emptying of Solids

    Percentage of solids moved from the stomach to the small intestine (gastric emptying) at 4 hours on Day 28.

    Time frame: Day 28

  6. Change in Colonic Transit at 24 Hours

    The scintigraphic method is used to measure colonic transit. An isotope is adsorbed on activated charcoal particles and delivered to the colon in a delayed release capsule. Anterior and posterior gamma images are taken at 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours. The geometric center (GC) is the weighted average of counts in the different colonic regions. The scale ranges from 1 to 5; a high GC implies faster colonic transit, a GC of 1 implies all isotope is in the ascending colon, and a GC of 5 implies all isotope is in the stool.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28

  7. Colonic Transit at 48 Hours

    The scintigraphic method is used to measure colonic transit. An isotope is adsorbed on activated charcoal particles and delivered to the colon in a delayed release capsule. Anterior and posterior gamma images are taken at 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours. The geometric center (GC) is the weighted average of counts in the different colonic regions. The scale ranges from 1 to 5; a high GC implies faster colonic transit, a GC of 1 implies all isotope is in the ascending colon, and a GC of 5 implies all isotope is in the stool.

    Time frame: Day 28

  8. Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life

    Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) is a self-reported measure used to assess the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on a participant's quality of life. The IBS-QOL consists of 34 items that cover eight distinct sub-domains, including emotional well-being, social functioning, dietary habits and intimate relationships. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal). The raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale where higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline; Day 28; Day 56

  9. Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

    The number of participants who experienced an Adverse Event.

    Time frame: Day 1; Day 28

07

Results

Posted May 22, 2026

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRimegepantPlacebo
Started1212
Completed1212
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Abdominal Pain Scores

The change in daily abdominal pain scores will be assessed using the 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "no pain" on the left, and "worst possible pain" on the right. Participants will identify their pain level by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "No pain" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse pain.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Abdominal Pain Scores
score on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Change in Abdominal Pain Scores-12 (-16.9 to -6.4)-22.6 (-30.3 to -8.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.41
SecondaryChange in Bowel Movement Frequency

The change in bowel movement frequency measured by the number of bowel movements a participant reported having each day from baseline through day 28.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · bowel movements per day
Change in Bowel Movement Frequency
bowel movements per dayRimegepantPlacebo
Change in Bowel Movement Frequency-0.2 (-0.8 to 0)-0.9 (-1 to -0.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.043
SecondaryChange in Rectal Compliance

The change in rectal compliance threshold defined as the change in pressure at half maximum volume (Pr 1/2) measured using a rectal barostat device. The rectal barostat device is a rectal catheter with a polyethylene bag attached (length 22 cm; capacity 600 ml) that is inserted into the rectum and connected to a barostat. The bag is unfolded by inflation with 75 ml of air, followed by complete deflation. After a 10 minute recovery period, the pressure is increased from 0 mmHg in steps of 4 mmHg for 15 seconds per step until 20 mmHg is reached. The observed volume/maximum observed volume will be used to obtain a pressure corresponding to half the maximum observed volume. A calculation of the pressures corresponding to the volumes just above and just below the half maximum volume will provided the specific pressure (Pr 1/2) corresponding to one half of the maximum observed volume.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · mmHg
Change in Rectal Compliance
mmHgRimegepantPlacebo
Change in Rectal Compliance2.1 (-1.3 to 7)-0.1 (-4.2 to 2.2)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.041
SecondaryChange in Rectal Sensation Pain Threshold

The change in rectal sensation pain threshold in response to the pressure in the balloon escalating from 0 mmHg to 44 mmHg at 4 mmHg stepwise increases measured using the 100-mm Visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranges from (unnoticeable) to (unbearable). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "unnoticeable" on the left, and "unbearable" on the right. Participants will identify their level of pain by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "unnoticeable" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain score. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worse pain.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Rectal Sensation Pain Threshold
score on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Change in Rectal Sensation Pain Threshold4.0 (-4.0 to 10.0)0.0 (-4.0 to 4.0)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.098
SecondaryChange in Rectal Sensation Ratings in Response to 24 and 36 mmHg Distensions

The change in rectal sensation ratings in response to 24 mmHg and 36 mmHg distensions measured using the 100-mm Visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranges from (unnoticeable) to (unbearable). The VAS line will be 100 mm long with no intermediate delineations. Each end will be marked with "unnoticeable" on the left, and "unbearable" on the right. Participants will identify their sensation of pain, urgency and gas levels by indicating a point on the line between each end. That point will be measured from the "unnoticeable" end, and the number of millimeters will be reported as the pain, gas and urgency scores. Total scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating worsening sensation of pain, urgency and gas.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Rectal Sensation Ratings in Response to 24 and 36 mmHg Distensions
score on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Gas at 24 mmHg-23.5 (-35 to -0.5)-7 (-21 to 14)
Urgency at 24 mmHg-13.5 (-32 to -7)-6 (-14 to -0.5)
Pain at 24 mmHg-11 (-29 to 1)4 (-2 to 10)
Gas at 36 mmHg-1 (-26 to 6)-1 (-6 to 13)
Urgency at 36 mmHg-12 (-27 to 2)0.5 (-5 to 8)
Pain at 36 mmHg-12 (-20 to 9)3 (-1 to 8)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.021
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.019
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.014
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.027
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.051
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.099
SecondaryGastric Emptying of Solids

Percentage of solids moved from the stomach to the small intestine (gastric emptying) at 4 hours on Day 28.

Time frame:
Day 28
Reported as:
Median · percentage of solids emptied
Gastric Emptying of Solids
percentage of solids emptiedRimegepantPlacebo
Gastric Emptying of Solids0.9 (0.8 to 1)0.9 (0.7 to 1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.22
SecondaryChange in Colonic Transit at 24 Hours

The scintigraphic method is used to measure colonic transit. An isotope is adsorbed on activated charcoal particles and delivered to the colon in a delayed release capsule. Anterior and posterior gamma images are taken at 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours. The geometric center (GC) is the weighted average of counts in the different colonic regions. The scale ranges from 1 to 5; a high GC implies faster colonic transit, a GC of 1 implies all isotope is in the ascending colon, and a GC of 5 implies all isotope is in the stool.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Change in Colonic Transit at 24 Hours
units on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Change in Colonic Transit at 24 Hours-0.3 (-1.2 to 1.6)0.4 (-0.3 to 1.1)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.90
SecondaryColonic Transit at 48 Hours

The scintigraphic method is used to measure colonic transit. An isotope is adsorbed on activated charcoal particles and delivered to the colon in a delayed release capsule. Anterior and posterior gamma images are taken at 4, 6, 8, 24, and 48 hours. The geometric center (GC) is the weighted average of counts in the different colonic regions. The scale ranges from 1 to 5; a high GC implies faster colonic transit, a GC of 1 implies all isotope is in the ascending colon, and a GC of 5 implies all isotope is in the stool.

Time frame:
Day 28
Reported as:
Median · units on a scale
Colonic Transit at 48 Hours
units on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Colonic Transit at 48 Hours4.7 (2.7 to 5)4.3 (2.8 to 4.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.86
SecondaryIrritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life

Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life (IBS-QOL) is a self-reported measure used to assess the impact of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) on a participant's quality of life. The IBS-QOL consists of 34 items that cover eight distinct sub-domains, including emotional well-being, social functioning, dietary habits and intimate relationships. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal). The raw scores are converted to a 0-100 scale where higher scores indicate a better quality of life.

Time frame:
Baseline; Day 28; Day 56
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Quality of Life
score on a scaleRimegepantPlacebo
Baseline61.4 (46.3 to 70.6)74.3 (53.7 to 84.9)
Day 2875 (57.7 to 83.1)73.2 (64.3 to 89.3)
Day 5672.8 (51.5 to 89.7)75 (50 to 80.9)
Statistical analysis
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.21
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.66
  • Rimegepant vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.26
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event

The number of participants who experienced an Adverse Event.

Time frame:
Day 1; Day 28
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event
ParticipantsRimegepantPlacebo
Number of Participants Who Experienced an Adverse Event33

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were collected from the date the participant received the first dose of medication through the washout period, approximately 56 days.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Rimegepant0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)3/12 (25%)
Placebo0/12 (0%)0/12 (0%)3/12 (25%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventRimegepantPlacebo
Change of bowel habit (reduced frequency)Gastrointestinal disorders2/120/12
RetchingGastrointestinal disorders0/121/12
MigraineNervous system disorders0/121/12
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/120/12
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/121/12
RashInfections and infestations1/120/12
Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia SyndromeNervous system disorders0/121/12

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)RimegepantPlaceboTotal
Median38 (29 to 43)38 (28.5 to 43)38.0 (29.0 to 43.0)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)RimegepantPlaceboTotal
Female10717
Male257
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)RimegepantPlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino000
Not Hispanic or Latino121224
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)RimegepantPlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American000
White121224
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)RimegepantPlaceboTotal
United States121224
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 11, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 22, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06221111
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
Pfizer
Responsible party
Michael Camilleri, MD (Professor of Medicine, Pharmacology and Physiology, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 24, 2024
Start date
Jun 6, 2024
Primary completion
May 30, 2025
Completion
Jun 3, 2025
Results posted
May 22, 2026
Last update
May 22, 2026

Study contacts

Michael Camilleri
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion