ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07899619Updated Oct 27, 2026

Recovery Modalities and Application Sequence in Elite Female Basketball Players

An interventional study of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) and Local Heat and Mechanical Vibration (Venom 2 Leg) in Basketball, Basketball Performance and Recovery, sponsored by Medipol University. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 35 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Medipol University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 27, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
45
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 35 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of intermittent pneumatic compression, local heat, and mechanical vibration applications on recovery following high-intensity anaerobic exercise in elite female basketball players. Recovery levels of the athletes will be evaluated through blood lactate concentration, countermovement jump performance, perceived recovery status, and perceived muscle soreness. The study will compare the effects of different recovery application sequences on post-exercise recovery indicators.

Read the detailed description

High-intensity anaerobic exercise, especially in sports such as basketball involving repetitive sprints, jumps, and high-intensity efforts, can cause temporary fatigue and performance decrements following exercise. Accelerating post-exercise recovery is crucial for enabling athletes to become physically prepared for subsequent training sessions or competitions. Various physical recovery modalities are utilized to support recovery in athletes. Intermittent pneumatic compression is a method aimed at supporting circulation by applying controlled pressure to the extremities, contributing to the clearance of metabolic load accumulated after exercise. Local heat and mechanical vibration application aims to facilitate the recovery process by generating thermal and mechanical stimulation in the targeted region. However, further research is required to compare the effects of these two distinct modalities on recovery indicators following high-intensity anaerobic exercise. This study aims to examine the responses of elite female basketball players to different recovery applications following high-intensity anaerobic exercise. Changes during the recovery process will be monitored using biochemical, performance-based, and subjective evaluation measures. Thus, the potential effects of different physical recovery methods during post-exercise recovery will be evaluated comparatively. The findings obtained from this study are expected to contribute to the evaluation of recovery strategies applicable to elite female basketball players following high-intensity exercise, as well as to practices supporting athlete health and performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Basketball
  • Basketball Performance
  • Recovery
  • Recovery After Exercise

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Recovery
  • Basketball
  • Exercise
  • Sports
03

In context

Motor Activity

2,684 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,217 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 45 is below the median of 60 across 2,344 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

Medipol University is the lead sponsor of 325 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria Female athletes aged 18-30 years. Being an active, licensed elite or professional female basketball player. Having played basketball regularly for at least 3 years. Being in the early follicular phase (days 2-5) of the menstrual cycle on the day of evaluation.

No history of severe lower extremity musculoskeletal injury or surgical operation in the last 6 months.

No regular use of medications that may affect physical performance or cardiometabolic responses.

Volunteering to participate in the study. Exclusion Criteria History of cardiovascular, neurological, or metabolic disease. Having experienced a lower extremity injury or undergone any surgical operation in the last 6 months.

Failure to comply with the pre-test restrictions (exercise, caffeine, alcohol, etc.) prior to the testing day.

Use of anticoagulant (blood thinner) medications or pregnancy. Presence of acute infection or delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) on the test day.

Occurrence of an injury during the study or emergence of any health problem that prevents continued participation.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
45 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Jobst-Venom Group

    Athletes in this group will undergo two consecutive recovery applications following the high-intensity anaerobic exercise protocol. First, intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied for 15 minutes, after which blood lactate concentration will be measured. This will be immediately followed by 15 minutes of local heat and mechanical vibration application. All procedures will be performed in accordance with the durations and standardized conditions specified in the study protocol. Recovery indicators will be evaluated at predetermined measurement time points before and after the applications.

    Device: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) · Device: Local Heat and Mechanical Vibration (Venom 2 Leg)

  • Experimental
    Venom-Jobst Group

    Athletes in this group will undergo two consecutive recovery applications following the high-intensity anaerobic exercise protocol. First, local heat and mechanical vibration will be applied for 15 minutes, after which blood lactate concentration will be measured. This will be immediately followed by 15 minutes of intermittent pneumatic compression application. All procedures will be performed in accordance with the durations and standardized conditions specified in the study protocol. Recovery indicators will be evaluated at predetermined measurement time points before and after the applications.

    Device: Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC) · Device: Local Heat and Mechanical Vibration (Venom 2 Leg)

  • Placebo comparator
    Passive Rest

    Participants in this group will rest passively in a supine position for 30 minutes instead of receiving intervention applications. No recovery modality will be applied during the passive rest period.

    Other: Passive Rest

Interventions

  • DeviceIntermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC)

    Intermittent pneumatic compression will be applied following high-intensity anaerobic exercise using the Jobst compression device. The application will be performed on the lower extremities at a pressure of 80 mmHg for a total duration of 15 minutes. The standard intermittent pneumatic compression program of the device will be utilized during the procedure.

  • DeviceLocal Heat and Mechanical Vibration (Venom 2 Leg)

    Local heat and mechanical vibration will be applied to both lower extremities following high-intensity anaerobic exercise using the Venom device. The application will last for a total duration of 15 minutes. Local heat will be administered at a medium level, and mechanical vibration will be applied using Mode 1 of the device.

  • OtherPassive Rest

    Participants will rest in a supine position for 30 minutes.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Post-Exercise Blood Lactate Concentration

    Blood lactate measurement performed using a portable blood lactate analyzer from capillary blood samples obtained via fingertip puncture to evaluate the metabolic efficacy of recovery modalities following high-intensity anaerobic exercise (RAST). Measurement results are expressed in mmol/L.

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 minutes post-RAST, immediately post-first intervention, and at the end of the second intervention or passive recovery period.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Lower Extremity Neuromuscular Performance (CMJ)

    A vertical jump test conducted to evaluate lower extremity neuromuscular performance. Participants are asked to perform a maximum vertical jump with their hands on their hips. The average jump height of three trials is recorded in centimeters (cm).

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 minutes post-RAST, immediately post-first intervention, and at the end of the second intervention or passive recovery period.

  2. Perceived Recovery Status (PRS)

    A single-item 0-10 point scale evaluating the subjective recovery level of athletes (0 = Very poorly recovered / Extremely tired, 10 = Completely recovered / Very well rested). Higher scores indicate better recovery status.

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 minutes post-RAST, immediately post-first intervention, and at the end of the second intervention or passive recovery period.

  3. Perceived Muscle Soreness (VAS)

    A 10-cm visual analog scale evaluating the level of perceived lower extremity muscle soreness following exercise. 0 cm indicates 'no pain' and 10 cm indicates 'unbearable pain.

    Time frame: At baseline, 3 minutes post-RAST, immediately post-first intervention, and at the end of the second intervention or passive recovery period.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared to protect participant privacy and maintain confidentiality in accordance with institutional review board (IRB) and data protection guidelines.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07899619
Lead sponsor
Medipol University
Responsible party
Gülay Aras Bayram (Associate Professor, Medipol University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Gülay A Bayram, 1
study director · Medipol University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion