ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07667270Updated Nov 4, 2026

Efficacy of Complex Decongestive Therapy, Exercise and Diet in Women With Lipedema

An interventional study of Anti-inflammatory Diet and Physical Therapy and Standard Diet and Physical Therapy in Lipedema, sponsored by Balikesir University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-04.

Sponsored by Balikesir University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 3 months later.
Updated Nov 4, 2026Now RecruitingSite recruiting status changedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of standard physical therapy methods (Complex Decongestive Therapy, Pneumatic Compression, and Exercise) combined with two different nutritional approaches (personalized anti-inflammatory diet vs. standard healthy nutrition education) in women diagnosed with lower extremity lipedema.

Read the detailed description

This single-center, prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial will include 75 female participants aged 18-65 with Stage I, II, or III lipedema. Participants will receive either a personalized anti-inflammatory diet or standard nutrition education, alongside a standard 12-week physical therapy protocol. Evaluations will be conducted at baseline, 4th, 8th, and 12th weeks to measure changes in lower extremity circumference/volume, body composition, ultrasonographic tissue characteristics, functional capacity (6MWT), pain severity (VAS), and quality of life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Lipedema

Keywords

  • Lipedema
  • diet
  • exercise
  • Complex Decongestive Therapy
  • Physical Therapy
03

In context

Lipedema

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Lipedema; 32 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 75 is above the median of 35 across 42 interventional studies indexed under Lipedema.

Browse Lipedema studies →

Lead sponsor

Balikesir University is the lead sponsor of 62 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female, aged 18 to 65 years.
  • Clinical and physical examination confirming Stage I, II, or III lipedema.
  • (BMI) \< 45 kg/m\^2.
  • Ability to walk without restriction.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of active .
  • Decompensated heart failure.
  • Significant lower extremity peripheral artery disease.
  • Acute deep vein thrombosis or active thromboembolism.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Significant sensory loss or severe neuropathy in the lower extremities.
  • History of lower extremity liposuction within the last 12 months.
  • Active severe infection (e.g., cellulitis).
  • Other severe systemic diseases deemed unsafe for the study by researchers.
  • Severe non-compliance with the study protocol (e.g., missing >30% of planned sessions) or participant requesting withdrawal.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anti-inflammatory Diet + Physical Therapy

    Participants in this arm will receive a personalized anti-inflammatory diet plan formulated by the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation clinic, in addition to a standard 12-week physical therapy protocol (Complex Decongestive Therapy, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, and exercise).

    Other: Anti-inflammatory Diet and Physical Therapy

  • Active comparator
    Standard Diet + Physical Therapy

    Participants in this arm will receive standard healthy nutrition education, in addition to a standard 12-week physical therapy protocol (Complex Decongestive Therapy, Intermittent Pneumatic Compression, and exercise).

    Other: Standard Diet and Physical Therapy

Interventions

  • OtherAnti-inflammatory Diet and Physical Therapy

    A personalized anti-inflammatory diet plan formulated by the clinic, combined with a 12-week standard physical therapy protocol. The physical therapy includes compression garments (CCL2), Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), and an exercise program.

  • OtherStandard Diet and Physical Therapy

    Standard healthy nutrition education, combined with a 12-week standard physical therapy protocol. The physical therapy includes compression garments (CCL2), Manual Lymphatic Drainage (MLD), Intermittent Pneumatic Compression (IPC), and an exercise program.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Lower Extremity Circumference

    Lower extremity circumferences will be measured in centimeters (cm) using a standardized tape measure at predefined anatomical landmarks, including the foot dorsum, ankle, and at 10-cm intervals proximally below the knee, as well as at the thigh. Change in lower extremity circumference from baseline will be evaluated within and between study groups.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Body Weight

    Body weight (kg) measured at each assessment visit using standardized equipment. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  2. Change in Subcutaneous tissue thickness (mm)

    Subcutaneous tissue thickness (mm) will be assessed via ultrasound at standardized anatomical landmarks (anterior thigh, inferomedial knee, lateral leg, pre-tibial, medial malleolus, and umbilical region). Both parameters are measured directly in millimeters (mm). Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  3. Change in Dermis thickness (mm)

    Dermis thickness (mm) will be assessed via ultrasound at standardized anatomical landmarks (anterior thigh, inferomedial knee, lateral leg, pre-tibial, medial malleolus, and umbilical region). Both parameters are measured directly in millimeters (mm). Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  4. Change in Fibrous Septa Prominence

    The prominence of fibrous septa within the subcutaneous tissue will be assessed by ultrasound at predefined lower-extremity anatomical landmarks using a visual scoring system ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater fibrotic septal prominence. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  5. Change in Subcutaneous Fat Tissue Echogenicity

    Subcutaneous fat tissue echogenicity will be assessed by ultrasound at predefined lower-extremity anatomical landmarks using a visual scoring system ranging from 0 to 3. Higher scores indicate greater echogenicity. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  6. Change in Rectus Femoris Muscle Thickness

    Rectus femoris muscle thickness will be measured by ultrasound in millimeters (mm) at a standardized anatomical site. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  7. Change in Rectus Femoris Muscle Echogenicity

    Rectus femoris muscle echogenicity will be assessed by ultrasound at a standardized anatomical site using a visual grading scale from Grade 1 to Grade 3. Higher grades indicate greater muscle echogenicity. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  8. Change in Abdominal Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue Thickness

    Abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue thickness will be measured by ultrasound in millimeters (mm) at locations 5 cm above and 5 cm below the umbilicus. The mean of these two measurements will be used for analysis. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  9. Change in Functional Capacity

    Assessment of submaximal exercise capacity using the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The total distance walked in 6 minutes will be recorded in meters (m). A higher score indicates better functional capacity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  10. Change in Pain Severity

    Evaluation of leg pain intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Scale range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain); lower scores indicate better outcome. Change from baseline will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  11. Change in Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema (PBI-L) Score

    The Patient Benefit Index-Lymphedema (PBI-L) is a patient-reported outcome measure used to assess the perceived benefit of treatment in individuals with lymphedema. It includes 23 items addressing treatment goals and the extent to which these goals have been achieved. Scores range from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater patient-perceived treatment benefit. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  12. Change in LYMQOL-Leg Score

    The LYMQOL-Leg is an 18-item, lymphedema-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with lower-limb lymphedema. It assesses the impact of lymphedema across relevant quality-of-life domains. Domain scores range from 1 to 4, with lower scores indicating a better outcome and less lymphedema-related impairment. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be assessed.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  13. Change in SF-12 Physical Component Summary Score

    The 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS) score assesses physical health status, including physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, and general health perceptions. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better physical health status. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  14. Change in SF-12 Mental Component Summary Score

    The SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS) score assesses mental health status, including psychological well-being, emotional role functioning, social functioning, and vitality. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better mental health status. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be evaluated.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

  15. Change in Beck Depression Inventory Score

    The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) is a 21-item self-report questionnaire used to assess the severity of depressive symptoms. Total scores range from 0 to 63, with lower scores indicating fewer depressive symptoms. Change from baseline to the specified follow-up time point will be assessed, with a decrease in score indicating improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, and Week 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 4, 2026
Sites
Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital is now Recruiting
Nov 4, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 4, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    Balikesir University Faculty of Medicine Hospital is now Recruiting
    + 2 other changes: verification date and date precision

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07667270
Lead sponsor
Balikesir University
Responsible party
Nilay Sahin (Prof. Dr., Balikesir University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 25, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 4, 2026

Study contacts

Nilay Sahin, Prof. Dr.
Contact
dincernilay@yahoo.com
+90 555 233 2535
Ender Salbas, Assist. Prof. Dr.
Contact
endersalbas@balikesir.edu.tr
+90 555 669 8639
Nilay Sahin, Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Balikesir University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion