ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07891455EGJ-SEDUpdated Oct 23, 2026

Sedation Depth and EGJ Endoscopic Grading: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Gerd, Esophagogastric Junction and American Foregut Society Classification, sponsored by Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik. Completed at 1 site in Egypt. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-23.

Sponsored by Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 23, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
192
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Brief Study Summary:

This prospective randomized controlled trial evaluates the impact of procedural sedation depth on the American Foregut Society (AFS) endoscopic grading of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) integrity and its correlation with objective gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) severity. A total of 192 adult patients undergoing diagnostic upper endoscopy were randomly allocated across three active sedation arms (Mild, Moderate, and Deep Sedation). Using a dual assessment protocol, AFS grades were recorded before and after sedation to assess how suppressing neuromuscular reflex tone unmasks underlying structural EGJ incompetence, with results correlated against baseline validated GerdQ scores, Los Angeles esophagitis grades, and 24-hour ambulatory pH-impedance monitoring.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gerd
  • Esophagogastric Junction
  • American Foregut Society Classification

Keywords

  • Esophagogastric junction
  • Ambulatory pH monitoring
  • Gastroesophageal reflux disease
  • Endoscopy
  • Sedation depth
  • American Foregut Society classification
03

In context

Gastroesophageal Reflux

1,086 studies on the registry are indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux; 187 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 192 is above the median of 72 across 724 interventional studies indexed under Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Browse Gastroesophageal Reflux studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria Age 18 to 75 years Referred for diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for evaluation of upper gastrointestinal symptoms (such as heartburn, regurgitation, chest pain, or dyspepsia) or clinical surveillance GerdQ score \ge 6 Ability to understand and provide written informed consent Exclusion Criteria Prior upper gastrointestinal, bariatric, or antireflux surgery Known primary esophageal motility disorders (e.g., achalasia, distal esophageal spasm) Large fixed hiatal hernia (\ge 5\text{ cm} or paraesophageal hernia) Active upper gastrointestinal bleeding Severe cardiopulmonary instability Pregnancy

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
192 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mild sedation

    Propofol titration targeting an Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (MOAA/S) score of 4.

    Device: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

  • Active comparator
    Moderate sedation

    Propofol plus intermittent fentanyl titration targeting an MOAA/S score of 2-3.

    Device: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

  • Active comparator
    Deep sedation

    Propofol plus dexmedetomidine infusion targeting an MOAA/S score of 1-2.

    Device: Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

Interventions

  • DeviceUpper gastrointestinal endoscopy

    EGD

    Also known as: Gastroscopy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in American Foregut Society (AFS) Endoscopic Grade from Before to After Sedation

    Evaluation of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) integrity using official AFS criteria (axial length L, aperture D, and flap valve F; overall Grades I-IV) recorded immediately upon intubation (before sedation) and at peak achieved sedation depth (after sedation).

    Time frame: During the diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy procedure (baseline pre-sedation vs. peak achieved sedation depth)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine
    Tanta, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 23, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 23, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07891455
Lead sponsor
Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik
Responsible party
Mohamed Abd El-Raouf Tawfik (Professor of internal medicine, Tanta University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Oct 23, 2026
Start date
Jun 1, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2026
Completion
Sep 30, 2026
Last update
Oct 23, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion