A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase and Lenalidomide in Multiple Myeloma (MM), sponsored by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-22.
Sponsored by Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment
This phase II/III trial compares the usual treatment (daratumumab and hyaluronidase, lenalidomide, bortezomib and dexamethasone [DaraRVd] regimen followed by autologous stem cell transplant [ASCT] followed by maintenance therapy) to DaraRVd treatment followed by bispecific antibody therapy (teclistamab and/or talquetamab) followed by maintenance therapy in treating patients with newly diagnosed, standard risk multiple myeloma. Daratumumab is in a class of medications called monoclonal antibodies. Daratumumab and hyaluronidase works by helping the body to slow or stop the growth of cancer cells. Hyaluronidase is an endoglycosidase. It helps to keep daratumumab in the body longer so that the medication will have a greater effect. Lenalidomide is in a class of medications called immunomodulatory agents. It works by helping the bone marrow to produce normal blood cells and by killing abnormal cells in the bone marrow. Bortezomib blocks several molecular pathways in a cell and may cause cancer cells to die. It is a type of proteasome inhibitor and a type of dipeptidyl boronic acid. Dexamethasone is in a class of medications called corticosteroids. It is used to reduce inflammation and lower the body's immune response to help lessen the side effects of chemotherapy drugs. Teclistamab and talquetamab are bispecific monoclonal antibodies that can bind to targets on both cancer cells and immune cells (T-cells) that may help the body's immune system attack the cancer, and may interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. Giving DaraRVd followed by teclistamab and/or talquetamab may work better in increasing the likelihood of reducing the cancer burden to the point that it is undetectable, and prolonging the time until the cancer returns compared to DaraRVd followed by ASCT.
Detailed Description:
The primary and secondary objectives of the study:
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine which bispecific antibody consolidation strategy (single agent teclistamab, single agent talquetamab or combination teclistamab + talquetamab) is most promising with respect to minimal residual disease (MRD)-negativity rate post-consolidation. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) II. To determine whether consolidation with bispecific antibody therapy (the winning arm from the phase 2 portion) is superior to high-dose melphalan (HDM)/autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) with respect to progression-free survival. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To estimate the rate of conversion from MRD-positive to MRD-negative post-induction to post-consolidation in each treatment arm. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) II. To estimate and compare the overall rate of MRD-negativity rate between the arms. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) III. To estimate and compare the MRD-negativity rate after 2 years of maintenance between the arms. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) IV. To evaluate the safety profile of bispecific antibody consolidation and how this compares to consolidation with high-dose melphalan/ASCT. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) V. To estimate and compare the incidence of severe infections between the treatment arms. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) VI. To estimate the progression free survival of each treatment arm. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) VII. To assess overall survival distribution for each treatment arm. (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) VIII. To assess overall response rate for each treatment arm (Randomized Phase 2 Portion) IX. To estimate and compare the incidence of severe infections between the two treatment arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) X. To assess overall survival distribution and evaluate this for consolidation with bispecific antibody therapy versus (vs.) consolidation with high-dose melphalan/ASCT. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XI. To estimate and compare the overall rate of MRD-negativity rate post-consolidation between the two arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XII. To estimate and compare the overall rate of MRD-negativity rate between the two arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XIII. To estimate and compare the MRD-negativity rate after 2 years of maintenance between the two arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XIV. To estimate and compare the rate of conversion from MRD positive to MRD negative post-induction to post-consolidation between the two arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XV. To estimate and compare the rate of sustained MRD-negativity for > 12 months duration between the two arms. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XVI. To evaluate the safety profile of bispecific antibody consolidation and how this compares to consolidation with high-dose melphalan/ASCT. (Randomized Phase 3 Portion) XVII. To assess overall response rate for each treatment arm (Randomized Phase 2 Portion)
EXPLORATORY OBJECTIVE:
I. To explore changes in the immune microenvironment that mediate response.
OUTLINE:
PHASE II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 arms.
ARM 1:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen consisting of: 1) daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase subcutaneously (SC) on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle; 2) lenalidomide orally (PO) on days 1-14 of each cycle; 3) bortezomib SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle; and 4) dexamethasone PO or intravenously (IV) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
CONSOLIDATION: Within 28 days of Induction response assessment, patients undergo ASCT and receive melphalan IV on a single day or on two consecutive days.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase SC on day 1 of each cycle and lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 26 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
ARM 2:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Arm 1.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Arm 1.
ARM 3:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Arm 1.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive talquetamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Arm 1.
ARM 4:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Arm 1.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab SC and talquetamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Arm 1.
PHASE III: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM 1:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients undergo ASCT and receive melphalan as in Phase II Arm 1.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1.
ARM 2:
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1.
CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab alone as in Phase II Arm 2, talquetamab alone as in Phase II Arm 3, or teclistamab and talquetamab together as in Phase II Arm 4.
MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1.
Patients in all arms also undergo positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), blood sample collection, and bone marrow aspiration and biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on study.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 12 weeks until disease progression or initiation of subsequent treatment, then every 6 months until 20 years following registration.
3,712 studies on the registry are indexed under Multiple Myeloma; 752 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 920 is above the median of 41 across 2,965 interventional studies indexed under Multiple Myeloma.
Browse Multiple Myeloma studies →Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology is the lead sponsor of 509 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.
Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (100%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Clonal bone marrow plasma cells ≥ 10% or biopsy-proven bony or extramedullary plasmacytoma and any one or more of the following CRAB features (myeloma-defining events) or biomarkers of malignancy:
Myeloma defining events (as per IMWG criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma):
** Evidence of end organ damage that can be attributed to the underlying plasma cell proliferative disorder, specifically (one or more of the following):
Biomarkers of malignancy:
Measurable disease as defined by any of the following:
* Serum M-protein ≥ 1.0 g/dL (≥ 0.5 g/dL if immunoglobulin A [IgA], IgD, IgE or IgM myeloma) or urine M-protein ≥ 200 mg/24 hours
In concordance with the International Myeloma Society/IMWG Consensus Recommendations, patients with high-risk multiple myeloma (HRMM) are excluded. HRMM is defined as having at least one of these abnormalities:
Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) information (obtained at diagnosis) will be collected for staging and data collection purposes only
Stage I
** All of the following:
*** ß2-microglobulin \< 3.5 mg/L
Stage II
** Neither stage I nor stage III
Stage III ** Both of the following:
Not pregnant and not nursing, because this study involves an investigational agent whose genotoxic, mutagenic and teratogenic effects on the developing fetus and newborn are unknown
* A female of childbearing potential is a sexually mature female who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months)
Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP):
*** Must use a contraceptive method that is highly effective (with a failure rate of \< 1% per year), preferably with low user dependency during the intervention period and for at least 5 months after the last dose of study intervention and agrees not to donate eggs (ova, oocytes) for the purpose of reproduction during this period. The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention
*** Must have a negative highly sensitive serum pregnancy test (as required by the lenalidomide Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies [REMS]) within 24 hours before the first dose of study intervention and agree to use a highly effective method of contraception during the study and for 5 months after the last dose of lenalidomide
*** The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with a nearly undetected pregnancy
Non-childbearing potential is defined as follows (by other than medical reasons):
Male patients must agree to use an adequate method of contraception for the duration of the study and for 90 days afterwards
Male participants: contraceptive use should be consistent with the lenalidomide REMS regarding the methods of contraception:
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following during the intervention period and for 6 months after the last dose of study treatment to allow for clearance of any altered sperm:
PLUS either:
Must agree to use contraception/barrier as detailed below:
Agree to use a male condom, even if they have undergone a successful vasectomy, and female partner to use an additional highly effective contraceptive method with a failure rate of \< 1% per year as when having sexual intercourse with a woman of childbearing potential (including pregnant females)
Exclusion Criteria:
N/A
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen consisting of: 1) daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase SC on days 1, 8, and 15 of each cycle; 2) lenalidomide PO on days 1-14 of each cycle; 3) bortezomib SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of each cycle; and 4) dexamethasone PO or IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, and 15 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 21 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. CONSOLIDATION: Patients undergo ASCT and receive melphalan IV on a single day or on two consecutive days. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase SC on day 1 of each cycle and lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 of each cycle. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 26 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Melphalan · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Teclistamab · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive talquetamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Biological: Talquetamab · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab SC and talquetamab SC on days 1, 4, 8, and 15 of cycle 1 and then on days 1 and 15 of cycles thereafter. Cycles repeat every 28 days for 4 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Drug: Teclistamab · Biological: Talquetamab · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1. CONSOLIDATION: Patients undergo ASCT and receive melphalan as in Phase II Arm 1. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Melphalan · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
INDUCTION: Patients receive the DaraRVd regimen as in Phase II Arm 1. CONSOLIDATION: Patients receive teclistamab alone as in Phase II Arm 2, talquetamab alone as in Phase II Arm 3, or teclistamab and talquetamab together as in Phase II Arm 4. MAINTENANCE: Patients receive daratumumab and recombinant human hyaluronidase and lenalidomide as in Phase II Arm 1. Patients also undergo PET/CT, collection of blood, and bone marrow aspiration/biopsy throughout the study. Patients may also undergo MRI on study.
Drug: Daratumumab and Recombinant Human Hyaluronidase · Drug: Lenalidomide · Drug: Bortezomib · Drug: Dexamethasone · Procedure: Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation · Drug: Melphalan · Drug: Teclistamab · Biological: Talquetamab · Procedure: Positron Emission Tomography · Procedure: Computed Tomography · Procedure: Biospecimen Collection · Procedure: Bone Marrow Aspiration · Procedure: Bone Marrow Biopsy · Procedure: Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Drug page: Daratumumab and Hyaluronidase-fihj
Given SC
Given PO
Given SC
Given PO or IV
Undergo ASCT
Also known as: AHSCT
Given IV
Given SC
Given SC
Undergo PET
Also known as: PET Scan
Undergo CT
Also known as: CT scan, CAT Scan
Undergo collection of blood
Undergo bone marrow aspiration
Undergo bone marrow biopsy
Undergo MRI
Also known as: MRI
Proportion of patients who are classified as being MRD-negative post-consolidation (Phase II)
Will be defined as the number of patients who are identified as having no detectable minimal residual disease (MRD) (absence of malignant cells at a sensitivity threshold of 10\^-5 or lower using next generation sequencing) after consolidation therapy divided by the total number of evaluable patients on the given treatment arm. Will conduct separate pairwise comparisons of each of the three bispecific antibody (BsAb) treatment arms against the common control arm.
Time frame: Up to 1 year from registration
Progression-free survival (PFS) (Phase III)
Will be evaluated and compared using a log-rank test to compare differences between those randomized to receive the most promising BsAb as consolidation (identified from the phase II portion of this trial) vs. those randomized to receive consolidation with high-dose melphalan/autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). PFS distributions will be evaluated graphically using the methods of Kaplan and Meier, 4-year PFS rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated.
Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of documented disease progression and/or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 20 years
Overall survival (OS) (Phase II)
Kaplan-Meier methods will be used to estimate key aspects and characteristics of the survival distributions. 4 year estimates will be generated along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 20 years
ate of conversion from MRD-positive to MRD-negative post-induction to post-consolidation in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients converted from MRD-positive after induction to MRD-negative after consolidation therapy divided by the number of patients MRD-positive patients after induction.
Time frame: Up to 12 months from randomization
Overall rate of MRD-negativity in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve MRD-negativity after the start of treatment divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of MRD-negativity after 2 years of maintenance in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve MRD-negativity after maintenance divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of grade 3+ adverse events in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients with a grade 3+ adverse event divided by the number of patients that received treatment.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of grade 3+ serious infection in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients with a grade 3+ infection (CTCAE) divided by the number of patients starting consolidation therapy.
Time frame: Within 1 year of starting consolidation
Progression-free survival (PFS) (Phase II)
For each treatment arm, 4-year PFS rates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier
Time frame: From date of randomization to the date of documented disease progression and/or death due to any cause, whichever comes first, assessed up to 20 years
Overall response rate in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve the best response divided by the number of randomized patients to that treatment arm
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of grade 3+ serious infection in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients with a grade 3+ infection (CTCAE) divided by the number of patients starting consolidation therapy.
Time frame: Within 1 year of starting consolidation
Overall survival (OS) (Phase III)
Kaplan-Meier methods will be used to estimate key aspects and characteristics of the survival distributions. 4 year estimates will be generated along with corresponding 95% confidence intervals.
Time frame: From randomization to the time of death due to any cause, assessed up to 20 years
Rate of MRD-negative post-consolidation in each treatment arm (Phase II)
Defined as the number of patients MRD-negative after consolidation therapy divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline
Time frame: Up to 12 months from randomization
Overall rate of MRD-negativity in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve MRD-negativity after the start of treatment divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of MRD-negativity after 2 years of maintenance in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve MRD-negativity after maintenance divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of conversion from MRD-positive to MRD-negative post-induction to post-consolidation in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients converted from MRD-positive after induction to MRD-negative after consolidation therapy divided by the number of patients MRD-positive patients after induction.
Time frame: Up to 12 months from randomization
Rate of sustained MRD-negativity (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients with at least 12 months of sustained MRD-negativity divided by the number of MRD evaluable patients. Patients are evaluable for MRD if they have a trackable clonality sequence at baseline.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Rate of grade 3+ adverse events in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients with a grade 3+ adverse event divided by the number of patients that received treatment.
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
Overall response rate in each treatment arm (Phase III)
Defined as the number of patients who achieve the best response divided by the number of randomized patients to that treatment arm
Time frame: Up to 3 years from randomization
PFS by sex
Will provide estimates of PFS and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) by sex.
Time frame: Up to 20 years
PFS by race
Will provide estimates of PFS and the corresponding 95% CIs by race.
Time frame: Up to 20 years
PFS by ethnicity
Will provide estimates of PFS and the corresponding 95% CIs by ethnicity.
Time frame: Up to 20 years
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drugs tested here: Melphalan · Teclistamab · Talquetamab
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology →