ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07886333Updated Oct 21, 2026

Buzzy Bee for Pain and Anxiety Control During Pediatric Dental Local Anesthesia

An interventional study of Intervention A: Buzzy® Bee-Assisted Local Anesthesia and Intervention B: Conventional Local Anesthesia Technique in Anesthesia, Anxiety and Pain, sponsored by Tanta University. Recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 5 Years to 7 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Tanta University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 2 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Aug 2025, registered Oct 2026).
  • Started Aug 2025; still recruiting 1 year 2 months later.
Updated Oct 21, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
5 Years to 7 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present study will evaluate the effectiveness of Buzzy Bee in reducing pain and physiological responses during maxillary buccal infiltration in children aged 5-7 years compared with a conventional injection protocol.

Read the detailed description

Pain control during local anesthetic administration is essential in pediatric dentistry, as injection-related discomfort may increase anxiety and affect children's cooperation. The present study will evaluate the effectiveness of Buzzy Bee in reducing pain and physiological responses during maxillary buccal infiltration in children aged 5-7 years compared with a conventional injection protocol.

The study includes 40 children attending the Outpatient Clinic of the Pediatric Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University. A randomized crossover design will be used, with each child receiving both interventions during two visits separated by one week. Participants will be randomly allocated to the AB or BA sequence.

Both interventions involved topical application of 4% lidocaine hydrochloride gel for two minutes, followed by maxillary buccal infiltration using 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:200,000. The Buzzy Bee protocol incorporated external cold and vibration, whereas the conventional protocol used audiovisual distraction.

Heart rate will be recorded before, during, and after injection. Pain will be assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) scale and the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale.

02

Conditions studied

  • Anesthesia
  • Anxiety
  • Pain
  • Children

Keywords

  • Buzzy Bee Device
  • local anesthesia
  • dental anxiety
  • pain control
  • crossover
03

In context

Anxiety Disorders

5,063 studies on the registry are indexed under Anxiety Disorders; 1,408 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 80 across 4,339 interventional studies indexed under Anxiety Disorders.

Browse Anxiety Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Tanta University is the lead sponsor of 987 studies on the registry; 313 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
5 Years to 7 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Systemically healthy children classified as ASA-I.
  • Children requiring bilateral maxillary buccal infiltration local anesthesia across at least two separate dental treatment appointments.
  • Co-operative child with a Frankl behavior rating of 3,4.
  • Children free from any neurological or psychological disorder.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with known allergy to local anesthetic agents.
  • Children with developmental delays, intellectual disabilities, or severe uncooperative behavior (Frankl rating 1 or 2).
  • Children presenting with acute dental pain, swelling, or active infection at the injection site.
  • Parental refusal to provide written informed consent for participation
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sequence AB (Buzzy® Bee First, Then Conventional)

    Participants in Sequence AB receive Buzzy® Bee-assisted maxillary buccal infiltration local anesthesia during the first visit (Period 1). After a 1-week washout period, the same participants receive local anesthesia using the conventional administration technique during the second visit (Period 2).

    Device: Intervention A: Buzzy® Bee-Assisted Local Anesthesia · Drug: Intervention B: Conventional Local Anesthesia Technique

  • Experimental
    Sequence BA (Conventional First, Then Buzzy® Bee)

    Participants in Sequence BA receive conventional maxillary buccal infiltration local anesthesia during the first visit (Period 1). After a 1-week washout period, the same participants receive Buzzy® Bee-assisted local anesthesia during the second visit (Period 2).

    Device: Intervention A: Buzzy® Bee-Assisted Local Anesthesia · Drug: Intervention B: Conventional Local Anesthesia Technique

Interventions

  • DeviceIntervention A: Buzzy® Bee-Assisted Local Anesthesia

    Behavioral Guidance: Child preparation using the Tell-Show-Do technique. Device Application: The Buzzy® Bee device (equipped with pre-frozen wings) is activated to provide combined high-frequency vibration and cryotherapy. It is placed on the extraoral cheek skin approximately 1-2 cm proximal to the target injection site for 30 seconds prior to needle insertion and remains continuously active throughout needle insertion and solution deposition. Topical Anesthesia: Injection site is isolated with cotton rolls, dried, and treated with 2% Lidocaine gel applied for 2 minutes via a sterile cotton swab. Local Anesthesia Injection: Maxillary buccal infiltration is delivered using 4% Articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine via a sterile short 27-gauge needle, deposited slowly over 60 seconds while Buzzy® Bee is running.

  • DrugIntervention B: Conventional Local Anesthesia Technique

    Behavioral Guidance: Child preparation using standard Tell-Show-Do behavioral guidance paired with routine audiovisual distraction (cartoons displayed on a chair-side screen). Topical Anesthesia: Identical protocol to Intervention A (site isolation, drying, and 2% Lidocaine gel application for 2 minutes). Local Anesthesia Injection: Maxillary buccal infiltration delivered using 4% Articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine via a sterile short 27-gauge needle, deposited slowly over 60 seconds using identical technique, volume, and rate as Intervention A, but without external vibration or cryotherapy application.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Self-Reported Pain Intensity (Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale)

    Subjective pain intensity assessed using the validated Wong-Baker FACES® Pain Rating Scale. The scale features six facial expressions ranging from 0 ("No Hurt") to 10 ("Hurts Worst") in increments of 2 (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10). Following local anesthesia administration, the child is seated upright and points to the face that best represents their pain intensity experienced during needle insertion. Higher scores represent higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: Immediately post-injection (approx. 5 min post-baseline) at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physiological Anxiety / Stress Response (Heart Rate)

    Physiological stress and anxiety evaluated continuously via a pediatric pulse oximeter attached to the child's index finger. Heart rate is recorded in beats per minute (BPM) at three standardized procedural milestones: Baseline: 2 minutes prior to local anesthetic administration while resting in the chair. During Injection: Exact moment of needle insertion and solution deposition. Post-Injection: Immediately following needle withdrawal.

    Time frame: Baseline (2 minutes pre-injection), during injection (approx. 2-3 minutes post-baseline), and post-injection (approx. 5 minutes post-baseline) at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7).

  2. Behavioral Pain Expression (FLACC Scale)

    Objective behavioral pain expression assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) behavioral pain scale. Evaluated during the local anesthesia injection procedure by a trained independent observer (physically and via standardized video recording). Five categories are scored from 0 to 2, yielding a cumulative score ranging from 0 to 10: 0: Relaxed and comfortable 1-3: Mild discomfort 4-6: Moderate pain 7-10: Severe discomfort and/or pain Higher scores represent greater behavioral pain expression.

    Time frame: During the local anesthesia administration procedure (approx. 2 to 3 minutes post basline) at Visit 1 (Day 0) and Visit 2 (Day 7).

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • faculty of dentistry, Tanta university
    Tanta, Egypt
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Shilpapriya M, Jayanthi M, Reddy VN, Sakthivel R, Selvaraju G, Vijayakumar P. Effectiveness of new vibration delivery system on pain associated with injection of local anesthesia in children. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):173-6. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160343. PubMed 26156269 ↗
  • Hegde KM, R N, Srinivasan I, D R MK, Melwani A, Radhakrishna S. Effect of vibration during local anesthesia administration on pain, anxiety, and behavior of pediatric patients aged 6-11 years: A crossover split-mouth study. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;19(3):143-149. doi: 10.17245/jdapm.2019.19.3.143. Epub 2019 Jun 30. PubMed 31338420 ↗
09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 14 months after the start.

Of 2,720 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Anxiety Disorders, half reached primary completion within 13 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 31. This study's planned 14 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,789 studies reached it within 12 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2026
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
StartActual
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Oct 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07886333
Lead sponsor
Tanta University
Responsible party
Shaimaa Shaban Mohamed El-desouky (assistant professor of pediatric dentistry, Tanta University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 21, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

shaimaa eldesouky, assistant professor
Contact
shaimaaeldesouky@dent.tanta.edu.eg
01008994242

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion