An interventional study of Meta Solid Beverage A and Meta Solid Beverage B in Metabolic Disorder and Sub-health Status, sponsored by ChinaNorm. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.
Sponsored by ChinaNorm · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial targeting Chinese overweight/obese subjects aged 18-60 years with mild metabolic abnormalities. A total of 70 study participants are planned to be enrolled (the sample size requirement will be satisfied if the final valid dataset includes no fewer than 60 participants). The study aims to explore the effects of 12-week product intervention on glucose and lipid metabolism, body composition, and indicators related to metabolic syndrome.
This study adopts a double-blind design. All study participants will be randomly assigned into two groups. One group will receive the investigational product, a solid beverage containing postbiotics BPL1, *Aronia melanocarpa* fruit extract, apple polyphenols, D-allulose, inulin, lutein and other ingredients. The other group will receive the placebo control, a solid beverage identical to the investigational product in appearance, taste and packaging but without the above active ingredients.
1,002 studies on the registry are indexed under Metabolic Diseases; 231 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 70 is above the median of 48 across 673 interventional studies indexed under Metabolic Diseases.
Browse Metabolic Diseases studies →ChinaNorm is the lead sponsor of 28 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Mild abnormalities in biochemical indicators: Fasting blood samples shall be collected during the screening period for testing of the following indicators. Subjects shall meet at least one criterion for mild abnormality, and none of the indicators shall reach the diagnostic threshold (see Item 2 of Exclusion Criteria for diagnostic thresholds):
Exclusion Criteria:
Biochemical indicators reaching diagnostic thresholds (corresponding to the above inclusion indicators; subjects will be excluded if any single indicator meets the threshold):
Subjects consume the investigational solid beverage containing postbiotics BPL1, \*Aronia melanocarpa\* fruit extract, apple polyphenols, D-allulose, inulin, lutein and other ingredients.
Other: Meta Solid Beverage A
Subjects consume placebo solid beverage. The placebo has identical appearance, taste and packaging to the investigational product, but does not contain the above active ingredients.
Other: Meta Solid Beverage B
Solid beverage containing postbiotics BPL1, \*Aronia melanocarpa\* fruit extract, apple polyphenols, D-allulose, inulin, lutein and other ingredients. Subjects consume \*\*1 sachet per day\*\* during the study period; each sachet is reconstituted with 150 mL warm water, fully mixed and then ingested.
Placebo solid beverage with identical appearance, taste and packaging to the investigational product. It does not contain postbiotics BPL1, \*Aronia melanocarpa\* fruit extract, apple polyphenols, D-allulose, inulin, lutein or other active ingredients. Subjects consume this placebo daily during the study period.
Change in Metabolic Syndrome Risk Index (MetS)
Change from baseline in Metabolic Syndrome Risk Index (MetS). This composite index integrates body composition, glucose metabolism and lipid metabolism indicators to assess the overall metabolic risk and systemic sub-health improvement of subjects.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in waist circumference
Change from baseline in waist circumference, to assess central obesity improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in basal metabolic rate calculated by Cunningham formula
Change from baseline in basal metabolic rate calculated by Cunningham formula, derived from body fat percentage, to assess changes in resting energy consumption.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in fasting blood glucose
Change from baseline in fasting blood glucose, to evaluate glucose metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance)
Change from baseline in HOMA-IR (Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance). HOMA-IR is a single derived value calculated using fasting blood glucose and fasting insulin, to assess insulin sensitivity.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure
Change from baseline in systolic blood pressure and diastolic blood pressure, to evaluate vascular function, which is not included in Metabolic Syndrome Risk Index aggregation.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in palm skin surface temperature
Change from baseline in palm skin surface temperature, for objective evaluation of peripheral microcirculation improvement, associated with relief of cold extremity symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in SF-36 health survey summary score
Change from baseline in the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). SF-36 yields two summary scores: Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Each summary score ranges from 0 to 100, higher scores indicate better health-related quality of life, to assess health-related quality of life improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in Bristol stool form scale score
Change from baseline in Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS) score. The unabbreviated scale name is Bristol Stool Form Scale; individual raw scores range from 1 to 7. Higher raw BSFS scores represent looser stool consistency.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Subjective product evaluation questionnaire score
Total score from the Subjective Product Evaluation Questionnaire, a study-specific questionnaire containing 12 items to assess participants' subjective perception and satisfaction with the investigational product. Each item is rated from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The total score ranges from 12 to 60; higher total scores indicate greater perceived improvement and higher satisfaction with the investigational product.
Time frame: 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in hip circumference
Change from baseline in hip circumference, to assess central obesity improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in waist-to-height ratio
Change from baseline in waist-to-height ratio, to assess central obesity improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in waist-to-hip ratio
Change from baseline in waist-to-hip ratio, to assess central obesity improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in body fat percentage
Change from baseline in body fat percentage, to assess body fat improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in body mass index (BMI)
Change from baseline in body mass index (BMI), to assess body fat improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in basal metabolic rate calculated by Nelson formula
Change from baseline in basal metabolic rate calculated by Nelson formula, derived from body fat percentage, to assess changes in resting energy consumption.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in fasting insulin
Change from baseline in fasting insulin, to evaluate glucose metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in triglyceride
Change from baseline in triglyceride, to evaluate lipid metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in total cholesterol
Change from baseline in total cholesterol, to evaluate lipid metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)
Change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), to evaluate lipid metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)
Change from baseline in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), to evaluate lipid metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in apolipoprotein B
Change from baseline in apolipoprotein B, to evaluate lipid metabolism status.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks after intervention
Change in IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) score
Change from baseline in IBS Symptom Severity Scale (IBS-SSS) score. Scores range from 0 to 500; higher scores indicate more severe IBS symptoms, to evaluate the severity of intestinal symptoms.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Skin carotenoid index
Change from baseline in skin carotenoid index, an exploratory indicator for antioxidant defense assessment. It is measured by skin autofluorescence spectroscopy instrument to reflect skin antioxidant reserve level.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Skin stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss
Change from baseline in skin stratum corneum hydration and transepidermal water loss, exploratory objective indicators for skin health evaluation.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Skin status self-assessment questionnaire score
Change from baseline in skin status self-assessment questionnaire score, exploratory subjective indicator for skin health evaluation.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Digit Symbol Substitution Test accuracy, N-back task accuracy and Stroop color-word interference effect value
Change from baseline in Digit Symbol Substitution Test accuracy, N-back task accuracy and Stroop color-word interference effect value, exploratory indicators to assess cognitive performance.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Visual fatigue scale score
Change from baseline in visual fatigue scale score, exploratory indicator for eye function assessment.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Number of days with upper respiratory tract infection
Number of days of upper respiratory tract infection during the study period, exploratory indicator for immune function assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and throughout the 12-week intervention period
Lifestyle questionnaire
Data collected from lifestyle questionnaire at baseline and post-intervention, exploratory collection of participants' lifestyle information.
Time frame: Baseline
Skin advanced glycation end products
Change from baseline in skin advanced glycation end products, an exploratory indicator for antioxidant defense assessment. Measured by AGE Reader via skin autofluorescence spectroscopy to assess accumulation of skin advanced glycation end products.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Skin erythema index
Change from baseline in skin erythema index, an exploratory indicator for antioxidant defense assessment. Measured by Mexameter MX18 (Courage\&Khazaka, Germany) based on spectral absorption principle to evaluate skin redness and inflammatory status.
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 weeks after intervention
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Started Jul 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 3 months after the start.
Of 318 interventional studies with no phase under Metabolic Diseases, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 10 and three quarters within 40. This study's planned 3 months is below that.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.
Contact study teamGet an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.