ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07882368Updated Oct 20, 2026

Effects of Irrigation Activation and Obturation Techniques on Pain After Root Canal Treatment

An interventional study of Conventional Needle Irrigation and Sonic Irrigation Activation in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP) and Post Operative Pain After Root Canal Therapy, sponsored by Biruni University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Biruni University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 20, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aimed to compare postoperative pain and analgesic use following single-visit root canal treatment performed using different final irrigation activation and root canal obturation techniques in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis.

A total of 72 adult patients aged 18 to 65 years with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in permanent single rooted, single canal teeth were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (18 patients in each group). The groups received conventional needle irrigation with cold lateral condensation, EDDY sonic irrigation activation with cold lateral condensation, conventional needle irrigation with Fast-Fill thermoplasticized obturation, or EDDY sonic irrigation activation with Fast-Fill thermoplasticized obturation.

All treatments were completed in a single visit using standardized root canal preparation procedures. Pain intensity was recorded using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale before treatment and at 8, 24, and 48 hours and 7 days after treatment. The use of pain-relieving medication was also recorded.

The study was designed to determine whether irrigation activation and obturation techniques influence postoperative pain and analgesic consumption following root canal treatment.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Biruni University, Istanbul, Türkiye. The study included 72 patients aged 18-65 years diagnosed with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in permanent single rooted teeth with a single root canal and closed apices. Ethical approval was obtained from the Biruni University Ethics Committee (2015-KAEK-80-23-41), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

An a priori sample size calculation was performed using G*Power 3.1, assuming an effect size of 0.79, a significance level of 0.05, and 80% statistical power. The minimum required sample size was 14 participants per group. To account for potential dropout, 18 participants were enrolled in each of the four groups.

Participants were randomly allocated to four parallel groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence prepared by an individual not involved in the study. Group assignments were concealed in sealed opaque envelopes until treatment. Participants were not informed of the specific treatment technique assigned to them.

All root canal treatments were performed in a single appointment by one experienced endodontist. Following local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation, working length was determined using an electronic apex locator and confirmed radiographically. Root canals were prepared using the XP-endo Rise Glider and XP-endo Rise Shaper systems. The instrumentation protocol was standardized across all groups.

Group 1 received conventional needle final irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA, followed by cold lateral condensation using gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer.

Group 2 received sonic activation of 2.5% sodium hypochlorite and 17% EDTA using the EDDY system, followed by cold lateral condensation using gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer.

Group 3 received conventional needle final irrigation followed by thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation using the Fast-Pack and Fast-Fill systems with AH Plus sealer.

Group 4 received EDDY sonic irrigation activation followed by thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation using the Fast-Pack and Fast-Fill systems with AH Plus sealer.

Following obturation, the quality of the root canal filling was assessed radiographically, and definitive coronal restorations were completed using composite resin.

Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) before treatment and at 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after treatment. Participants recorded pain scores and analgesic consumption on standardized forms. Ibuprofen 600 mg every 8 hours was recommended when needed for pain relief; paracetamol 500 mg was recommended when ibuprofen was unsuitable. Completed assessment forms were collected at the one-week follow-up visit.

The primary outcome was postoperative pain intensity. Analgesic consumption was additionally evaluated. Statistical analyses were performed using nonparametric methods, with statistical significance set at p \< 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP)
  • Post Operative Pain After Root Canal Therapy

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • EDDY
  • Fast-Fill
  • Irrigation activation
  • Post-operative pain
  • Thermoplasticized gutta-percha obturation
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,224 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,154 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 72 is close to the median of 75 across 4,457 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Biruni University is the lead sponsor of 179 studies on the registry; 44 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18-65 years without any medical conditions.
  • No history of allergic reactions to any components employed in this research.
  • Patients presenting with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in permanent single-rooted teeth with a single canal, exhibiting closed apices.
  • Patients with no signs of periodontal disease.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women.
  • Patients diagnosed with systemic diseases.
  • Teeth with open apices, prosthetic restorations, grade II or higher mobility, periodontal pocket depths >4 mm, unrestorable status, root canal calcification, resorptive defects, traumatic occlusion, requiring a post-core restoration, and a history of previous endodontic treatment.
  • Presence of an adjacent tooth requiring endodontic therapy.
  • Patients with a history of analgesic intake in the 12 hours prior to the procedure.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Group 1: Conventional Irrigation + CLC

    Participants received conventional final irrigation followed by root canal obturation using the cold lateral condensation technique.

    Procedure: Conventional Needle Irrigation · Procedure: Cold Lateral Condensation

  • Experimental
    Group 2 - EDDY + CLC

    Participants received final irrigation activation using the EDDY sonic activation system followed by root canal obturation using the cold lateral condensation technique.

    Procedure: Sonic Irrigation Activation · Procedure: Cold Lateral Condensation

  • Experimental
    Group 3: Conventional Irrigation + Fast-Fill

    Participants received conventional final irrigation followed by thermoplasticized root canal obturation using the Fast-Fill system.

    Procedure: Conventional Needle Irrigation · Procedure: Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha Obturation

  • Experimental
    Group 4: EDDY + Fast-Fill

    Participants received final irrigation activation using the EDDY sonic activation system followed by thermoplasticized root canal obturation using the Fast-Fill system.

    Procedure: Sonic Irrigation Activation · Procedure: Thermoplasticized Gutta-Percha Obturation

Interventions

  • ProcedureConventional Needle Irrigation

    Final root canal irrigation was performed using conventional needle irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), without sonic activation.

  • ProcedureSonic Irrigation Activation

    Final irrigation was performed using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% EDTA, activated with the EDDY sonic irrigation activation system.

    Also known as: EDDY

  • ProcedureCold Lateral Condensation

    Root canals were obturated using the cold lateral condensation technique with gutta-percha cones and AH Plus root canal sealer.

  • ProcedureThermoplasticized Gutta-Percha Obturation

    Root canals were obturated using thermoplasticized gutta-percha with the Fast-Pack and Fast-Fill systems and AH Plus root canal sealer.

    Also known as: Fast-Fill

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Intensity

    Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Participants recorded their pain intensity at predetermined intervals following single-visit root canal treatment. Higher scores indicated greater pain intensity.

    Time frame: 8, 24, and 48 hours and 7 days after treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Analgesic Consumption

    Postoperative analgesic consumption was assessed based on participants' self-reported use of pain-relieving medication following root canal treatment. Participants recorded their analgesic intake during the postoperative follow-up period using standardized assessment forms.

    Time frame: Within 7 days after root canal treatment

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Biruni University
    Istanbul, In the USA Or Canada, Please Select... 34010, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Nov 2024 to primary completion in Sep 2025, 9 months.

Of 1,888 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,901 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 13, 2026
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
StartActual
Nov 4, 2024
Primary completionActual
Sep 1, 2025
CompletionActual
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 20, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07882368
Lead sponsor
Biruni University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 4, 2024
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2025
Completion
Sep 1, 2025
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Tuna Kaplan, DDS, PhD
principal investigator · Biruni University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion