ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07881523Updated Oct 19, 2026

Ultrasound-Guided Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura Block Versus Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Renal Surgery :A Randomized Comparative Study.

An interventional study of Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP)Block and Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Renal Surgery, sponsored by Minia University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-19.

Sponsored by Minia University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 19, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this randomized comparative clinical trial is to compare the analgesic effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP) block versus Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block in adult patients undergoing open renal surgery. The main question it aims to answer is:

Does MTP block provide postoperative analgesia comparable to ESP block, as assessed by postoperative opioid consumption and pain scores?

Researchers will compare MTP block with ESP block to evaluate postoperative opioid consumption, pain intensity, time to first rescue analgesia, and the incidence of adverse events.

Participants will receive general anesthesia followed by either ultrasound-guided MTP block or ESP block before surgery. Postoperative pain and opioid consumption will be assessed for 24 hours after surgery.

Read the detailed description

This prospective, randomized, comparative,clinical study will be conducted to compare the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block and erector spinae plane (ESP) block in patients undergoing elective open renal surgery under general anesthesia.

A total of 50 patients of either sex, aged 18-65 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II and body mass index (BMI) of 20-35 kg/m², scheduled for elective open renal surgery through a subcostal incision, will be enrolled. The study will be conducted at Minia University after approval by the Institutional Ethical Committee and obtaining written informed consent from all participants.

Eligible patients will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio into two equal groups, with 25 patients in each group, using a computer-generated randomization sequence with concealed allocation. Group I will be assigned to receive an ultrasound-guided MTP block, while Group II will be assigned to receive an ultrasound-guided ESP block.

Standardized general anesthesia will be administered to all patients. Anesthesia will be induced with intravenous propofol (2-2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-2 µg/kg), and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg). Anesthesia will be maintained with 1-1.5 MAC isoflurane in an oxygen/air mixture, with additional doses of atracurium administered as required. Ventilation will be adjusted to maintain an end-tidal carbon dioxide level of 30-35 mmHg.

Additional intraoperative fentanyl (1 µg/kg) will be administered incrementally according to predefined hemodynamic criteria, specifically an increase in heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure of more than 20% from baseline.

The assigned regional block will be performed after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision, with the patient positioned in the lateral decubitus position and the operative side uppermost. All blocks will be performed under ultrasound guidance at the T9 vertebral level using 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine.

For the MTP group, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the midline at the T9 level. The transverse process and pleura will be identified. Using an in-plane technique, a 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in a cranial-to-caudal direction until the needle tip is positioned midway between the posterior aspect of the transverse process and the pleura. Following negative aspiration and confirmation of appropriate needle placement by hydrodissection, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization.

For the ESP group, the T9 transverse process will be identified using a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe placed approximately 2-3 cm lateral to the midline in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation. The trapezius, rhomboid major, and erector spinae muscles will be identified. Using an in-plane technique, a 22-gauge echogenic needle will be advanced in a cranial-to-caudal direction until the needle tip reaches the interfascial plane deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. Following negative aspiration and hydrodissection, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization.

At the end of surgery, residual neuromuscular blockade will be reversed with atropine (0.02 mg/kg) and neostigmine (0.04 mg/kg), followed by tracheal extubation. Patients will subsequently be transferred to the post-anesthesia care unit and then to the ward after achievement of a modified Aldrete score of at least 9.

A standardized multimodal analgesic regimen will be administered to all patients. Intravenous paracetamol 1 g will be administered at the end of surgery and subsequently every 6 hours. Intravenous ketorolac 30 mg will be administered every 8 hours during the first postoperative day. Intravenous nalbuphine will be administered as rescue analgesia when the postoperative NRS pain score is ≥4.

The primary outcome will be total postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as intravenous nalbuphine consumption in milligrams during the first 24 postoperative hours.

Secondary outcomes will include intraoperative fentanyl consumption, time to first rescue analgesic request, postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, hemodynamic parameters, patient satisfaction with pain relief, duration of hospital stay, and the incidence of perioperative complications.

Pain intensity will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. Hemodynamic parameters, including heart rate, oxygen saturation, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and mean arterial pressure, will be recorded at predefined intraoperative and postoperative time points.

Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management will be assessed using a 5-point Likert scale.

Perioperative complications will be recorded, including postoperative nausea and vomiting, hypotension, bradycardia, tachycardia, respiratory depression, vascular puncture, pneumothorax, allergic reactions, and signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.

If an NRS score of ≥4 is recorded during the first postoperative hour, block failure will be considered according to the study protocol. Rescue nalbuphine will be administered, and the patient will be excluded from the study.

The study will be conducted over a period of one year. The collected data will be analyzed statistically to compare the postoperative analgesic outcomes between the MTP and ESP block groups.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Open Renal Surgery

Keywords

  • Postoperative Analgesia, Open Renal Surgery, MTP, ESP
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Minia University is the lead sponsor of 368 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • ASA physical status I-II
  • BMI 20-35
  • age between 18-65 years
  • will have open renal surgery (open stone kidney or nephrectomy )

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Any allergy or contraindications to any of the study drugs.
  • Pain or chronic analgesic administration in the preoperative period.
  • Patients with coagulopathy or emergency surgery
  • Infection at local needle site of insertion.
  • Sever cardiac ,respiratory or liver diseases
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    midpoint transverse process to pleura (MTP) block

    After induction of general anesthesia, the patient will be positioned laterally. Under aseptic precautions, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed parasagittally at T9, 2-3 cm lateral to the midline. The transverse process and pleura will be identified. Using an in-plane cranial-to-caudal approach, a 22-G echogenic needle will be advanced to the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 mL saline, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization.

    Procedure: Midpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP)Block

  • Active comparator
    Erector spinae plane (ESP) block

    After induction of general anesthesia, the patient will be positioned laterally with the operative side uppermost. Under aseptic precautions, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed parasagittally at T9, 2-3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the transverse process and overlying muscles. Using an in-plane cranial-to-caudal approach, a 22-G echogenic needle will be advanced deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 mL saline, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization, confirming appropriate fascial spread.

    Procedure: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block

Interventions

  • ProcedureMidpoint Transverse Process to Pleura (MTP)Block

    After induction of general anesthesia, the patient will be positioned laterally. Under aseptic precautions, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed parasagittally at T9, 2-3 cm lateral to the midline. The transverse process and pleura will be identified. Using an in-plane cranial-to-caudal approach, a 22-G echogenic needle will be advanced to the midpoint between the transverse process and pleura. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 mL saline, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization.

  • ProcedureErector spinae plane (ESP) block

    After induction of general anesthesia, the patient will be positioned laterally with the operative side uppermost. Under aseptic precautions, a high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed parasagittally at T9, 2-3 cm lateral to the midline to identify the transverse process and overlying muscles. Using an in-plane cranial-to-caudal approach, a 22-G echogenic needle will be advanced deep to the erector spinae muscle and superficial to the transverse process. After negative aspiration and hydrodissection with 1-2 mL saline, 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected incrementally under continuous ultrasound visualization, confirming appropriate fascial spread.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The primary outcome is the total postoperative opioid consumption, expressed as I.V. Nalbuphine in mg in the first 24 hour postoperatively.

    measure I.V. Nalbuphine in mg in the first 24 hour postoperatively

    Time frame: the first 24 hour postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first analgesic request

    First Analgesic Request: time from end of surgery to first request of rescue analgesia accessed by minutes, if pain persists (NRS ≥ 4) nalbuphine 3mg IV will be given as a rescue analgesia.

    Time frame: time from end of surgery to first request of rescue analgesia accessed by minutes (assessed during the first 24 hours postoperatively.

  2. Postoperative pain assessment

    using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and during movement .Pain intensity will be assessed by asking patients to rate their current pain by selecting a number from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. The scale was explained to all patients prior to assessment to ensure understanding. No pain: 0 Mild pain: 1-2 Moderate pain: 4-6 Severe pain: 7-10

    Time frame: immediately after surgery, after 2hr, 4hr,6hr,8hr,12hr,16hr,20hr,24hr

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Nephrology and Urology Minia University Hospital
    Minya, Minya Governorate 61111, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 12 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2026
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027
Last update
Oct 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 19, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 19, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07881523
Lead sponsor
Minia University
Responsible party
Engy Nady Tawfeek Mikhail (Resident Physician, Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Management ., Minia University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 19, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 19, 2026

Study contacts

Engy Nady Mikhail, MBBS
Contact
engy.nadii@gmail.com
+201281701312
Sarah Omar Mousa, MD
Contact
sara.mohamed@mu.edu.eg
+201005376176
Sarah O Mousa, MD
study director · Minia University

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion