ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07872865Updated Oct 14, 2026

Outcomes of Early Versus Late Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Patients Due to Head Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Tracheostomy in Head Injury and Traumatic Brain Injury, sponsored by University Of Anbar. Completed at 1 site in Iraq. Open to participants aged 10 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-14.

Sponsored by University Of Anbar · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 8 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2026, registered Oct 2026).
Updated Oct 14, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Tracheostomy is a surgical procedure that involves creating an opening in the trachea and bringing it to the skin surface to form a stoma. It may be performed as an emergency or elective operation. The main indications include relief of upper airway obstruction, protection of the lower respiratory tract, and facilitation of assisted ventilation in critically ill patients. Further studies are needed to identify the patient populations that may benefit from early tracheostomy. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate early tracheostomy (≤7 days) compared with late tracheostomy (>7 days) in relation to the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality in critically ill patients with traumatic head injury.

Read the detailed description

This study was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label controlled trial conducted among critically ill adult patients with traumatic brain injury requiring invasive mechanical ventilation.

Eligible participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either an early tracheostomy group or a late tracheostomy group. In the early tracheostomy group, tracheostomy was performed within 7 days of endotracheal intubation. In the late tracheostomy group, tracheostomy was performed more than 7 days after endotracheal intubation.

Due to the nature of the intervention, blinding of participants, treating physicians, and other care providers was not feasible. Both groups otherwise received standard intensive care and traumatic brain injury management according to the clinical protocols of the treating institution.

The primary outcome was the occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia during ICU admission. Secondary outcomes were 30-day all-cause mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, and hospital length of stay.

Clinical and demographic information was collected using standardized data collection forms. Recorded variables included participant characteristics, severity of traumatic brain injury, Glasgow Coma Scale score, relevant radiological and clinical findings, timing of tracheostomy, occurrence of ventilator-associated pneumonia, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU length of stay, hospital length of stay, and mortality status.

A total of 100 participants were included in the final study population. Outcomes were compared between the early and late tracheostomy groups using appropriate statistical methods for continuous and categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05.

The study was conducted following approval from the responsible ethical review authority, and informed consent was obtained from the participant or legally authorized representative as applicable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Head Injury
  • Traumatic Brain Injury

Keywords

  • Early tracheostomy
  • Late tracheostomy
  • Tracheostomy
  • Critically ill patients
  • Head injury
  • traumatic brain injury
  • Tracheostomy Timing
  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia
03

In context

Craniocerebral Trauma

264 studies on the registry are indexed under Craniocerebral Trauma; 45 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 60 across 141 interventional studies indexed under Craniocerebral Trauma.

Browse Craniocerebral Trauma studies →

Lead sponsor

University Of Anbar is the lead sponsor of 8 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged ≥10 years.
  • Isolated traumatic head injury (blunt or penetrating), or traumatic head injury associated with other trauma.
  • Expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation for at least 72 hours, as judged by the treating intensivist or neurosurgeon.
  • Endotracheal intubation performed during the current hospital admission.
  • Enrollment within 48 hours of ICU admission.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior tracheostomy during the same hospital admission.
  • Irreversible brain injury with anticipated withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment within 72 hours.
  • Uncorrectable coagulopathy precluding tracheostomy, including platelet count \<50 × 10\^9/L despite transfusion or INR >1.8 despite correction.
  • Uncontrolled intracranial hypertension prohibiting safe positioning for tracheostomy despite optimal management.
  • High cervical spine instability contraindicating positioning for tracheostomy, based on neurosurgical assessment.
  • Known pregnancy.
  • Enrollment in a conflicting interventional trial.
  • Prisoners or other vulnerable groups as defined by local regulations.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Early tracheostomy

    Participants with traumatic brain injury assigned to undergo tracheostomy within 7 days of endotracheal intubation.

    Procedure: Tracheostomy

  • Active comparator
    Late tracheostomy

    Participants with traumatic brain injury assigned to undergo tracheostomy more than 7 days after endotracheal intubation.

    Procedure: Tracheostomy

Interventions

  • ProcedureTracheostomy

    Tracheostomy performed in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury according to randomized assignment to either early tracheostomy within 7 days of endotracheal intubation or late tracheostomy after 7 days.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

    Ventilator-associated pneumonia was assessed from 48 hours after endotracheal intubation until ICU discharge, death, or 30 days after intubation, whichever occurred first.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after ICU admission.

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30-Day All-Cause Mortality

    Proportion of participants who died from any cause within 30 days after tracheostomy.

    Time frame: 30 days after tracheostomy.

  2. ICU Length of Stay

    Number of days from ICU admission until ICU discharge or death.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after ICU admission.

  3. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    number of days from initiation of invasive mechanical ventilation until successful liberation from mechanical ventilation or death.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after endotracheal intubation.

  4. Hospital Length of Stay

    Number of days from hospital admission until hospital discharge or death.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after hospital admission.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Anbar, College of Medicine
    Ramadi, Al-Anbar Governorate 31001, Iraq
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Terragni P, Faggiano C, Martin EL, Ranieri VM. Tracheostomy in mechanical ventilation. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;35(4):482-91. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383862. Epub 2014 Aug 11. PubMed 25111644 ↗
  • Boni A, Tonietto TA, Rihl MF, Viana MV. Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill patients: an umbrella review of systematic reviews of randomised clinical trials with meta-analyses and trial sequential analysis. BMJ Open Respir Res. 2025 Apr 5;12(1):e002434. doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2024-002434. PubMed 40187743 ↗
  • Dempsey GA, Morton B, Hammell C, Williams LT, Tudur Smith C, Jones T. Long-Term Outcome Following Tracheostomy in Critical Care: A Systematic Review. Crit Care Med. 2016 Mar;44(3):617-28. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001382. PubMed 26584197 ↗
  • Young D, Harrison DA, Cuthbertson BH, Rowan K; TracMan Collaborators. Effect of early vs late tracheostomy placement on survival in patients receiving mechanical ventilation: the TracMan randomized trial. JAMA. 2013 May 22;309(20):2121-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.5154. PubMed 23695482 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 14, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 14, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07872865
Lead sponsor
University Of Anbar
Responsible party
Raid M. Al-Ani (Professor, University Of Anbar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 14, 2026
Start date
Jan 7, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 25, 2026
Completion
Sep 25, 2026
Last update
Oct 14, 2026

Study contacts

Raid M Al-Ani, FIBMS
principal investigator · University of Anbar, College of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion