An observational study in Health Behavior, sponsored by Bridget Biggs. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-13.
Sponsored by Bridget Biggs · Observational
The goal of this observational study is to test a working prototype of a web-based application, Family Health Promoter (FHP), designed to support parents/guardians in facilitating positive health behavior change within their families. This initial prototype will focus on eating habits. Participants will use the application for two weeks and then complete an interview about their experience. The main questions the study aims to answer are:
967 studies on the registry are indexed under Health Behavior; 165 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 11 is below the median of 219 across 131 observational studies indexed under Health Behavior.
Browse Health Behavior studies →This is the only study on the registry with Bridget Biggs as lead sponsor.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Participants must be parents or guardians of at least one child aged 3-15 years who is a patient at Mayo Clinic or in the Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS)
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant interview responses about the application's usability and acceptability
Themes related to application usability and acceptability with participants that arise from qualitative analyses of participant responses to the semi-structured interview
Time frame: After two weeks of application use
System Usability Scale (SUS) Scores
Total scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher numbers reflecting more positive impressions of application usability. Scores will be interpreted according to published guidance from the developer of the SUS.
Time frame: After two weeks of application use
Usage data recorded by the application
count of features used and time spent with each feature
Time frame: 2 weeks
Plan to share: No — This is not a clinical trial. It is a small sample study to assess the usability and acceptability of a web-based application prototype to inform future application development. Sharing IPD is not likely to result in useful secondary analysis.
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.