ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07862062FACEiTUpdated Oct 7, 2026

Fathers and Children Exercising Together

An interventional study of Standard Intervention and Community-enhanced intervention in Physical Activity, sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 6 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-07.

Sponsored by Pennington Biomedical Research Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Updated Oct 7, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
26
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Children engage in low amounts of activity, which predisposes them to develop health disparities as they age. Fathers may be instrumental in helping to promote physical activity in their children. The current proposal is designed to use community-engaged research methods to develop a physical activity intervention for children in which their fathers are the agents of change, and to determine the feasibility of implementing this intervention.

Read the detailed description

The high prevalence of chronic disease in adults places African American children at increased risk of developing these conditions. Adults experience several chronic diseases that are modifiable via behavior change, including coronary heart disease, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, and obesity. One of the major modifiable risk factors for these chronic diseases is a lack of regular physical activity (PA). Neither adults nor children are engaging in PA at nationally recommended levels. Parents play an important role in shaping their children's PA. Cross-sectional research has shown that mothers and fathers exert unique influences on their child's PA. The role of mothers has been clearly explicated, and the research field is saturated with studies where mothers are the participating parent in an intervention. However, the unique contributions of fathers, especially African American fathers, and the benefits that they bring to a family-based intervention, are just beginning to be studied. To address this research gap, the investigators propose to assess the feasibility of a family-based PA promotion intervention in families that utilizes the father as the participating parent and to obtain preliminary evidence of efficacy. Phase I of the study involves conducted focus groups with fathers to determine key intervention components. Phase II will involve iterative refinement of the intervention materials through a series of focus groups. Phase III involves a randomized clinical trial to determine feasibility and preliminary evidence of efficacy. Father-child dyads will be randomly assigned into a standard intervention, a community-enhanced intervention, or an attention matched active control group. "Fathers" are defined as the resident or non-resident biological father, step-father, or male role model. Children must be insufficiently active and 6 - 10 years of age. Father-child dyads randomized into the standard intervention will receive the FACEiT family-based PA promotion intervention for 12 weeks. Father-child dyads randomized into the community-enhanced intervention will receive the standard intervention in addition to community supports. For this group, the investigators will work with Fathers On A Mission (F.O.A.M.) to provide community-based PA opportunities specifically for this group. This intervention is theoretically based. Father-child dyads randomized into the attention-matched active control group will receive the family-based healthy eating intervention for 8-weeks. This will be a standard behavioral program targeting improved nutrition. All study groups will have 8 group meetings. Dyads will be recruited through a variety of methods the investigators have utilized previously to recruit men and children into research studies including outreach, paid media, earned media, and school-based efforts. Dyads will complete a number of assessments including accelerometry, feasibility, satisfaction, anthropometry, activity readiness, sociodemographics, dietary intake, and questionnaires that tap into the theoretical underpinnings of the study. It is hypothesized that the FACEiT physical activity promotion intervention will be feasible to deliver and that participants will be highly satisfied with the program. Feasibility will be determined based on current recommendations utilizing clear thresholds and benchmarks. It is also hypothesized that the study will show preliminary evidence of efficacy, i.e. the physical activity intervention will result in a significantly greater increased daily step counts compared to the attention matched active control group. Finally, the investigators expect a greater change in secondary outcomes. It is expected that the feasibility data and estimated intervention effect sizes outcomes from this R21 proposal will be used to determine the requisite sample size for a larger R01 randomized trial. The overall goal of FACEiT is to refine the intervention to be an effective tool to promote physical activity in fathers and their children. In addition, not only will the investigators' community-based partner, F.O.A.M., work to ensure that the PA intervention is appropriate for fathers, but F.O.A.M. will also help to disseminate the intervention if it is shown to be effective.

02

Conditions studied

  • Physical Activity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • father
  • child
  • home environment
  • exercise
03

In context

Motor Activity

2,649 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Activity; 1,205 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 26 is below the median of 60 across 2,309 interventional studies indexed under Motor Activity.

Browse Motor Activity studies →

Lead sponsor

Pennington Biomedical Research Center is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

"Fathers" Inclusion criteria

  • self-identified male
  • at least 18 years of age
  • self-classify as a father/father figure of a 6-10 year old child
  • willing to attend group sessions (virtual and in person)
  • physically capable of exercise Exclusion criteria
  • cognitive or physical impairment that would interfere with participating in a group discussion or activity
  • unwilling to be audio recorded
  • unwilling to give written informed consent

Children Inclusion criteria

  • 6-10 years of age
  • willing to attend group sessions (in person)
  • average steps per day of less than the 50th percentile for age and gender
  • physically capable of exercise Exclusion criteria
  • cognitive or physical impairment that would interfere with participating in a group discussion or activity
  • unwilling to be audio recorded
  • unwilling to give written informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
26 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Physical activity

    Designed to increase physical activity

    Behavioral: Standard Intervention · Behavioral: Community-enhanced intervention

  • Experimental
    Control

    This is a control arm

    Behavioral: Dietary modification

Interventions

  • BehavioralStandard Intervention

    This is an 8-week intervention. Each session is 60 minutes. Each PA group session will end with group exercise (gradually progressing from 15 to 30 min) that is fun and engaging for the children. These activities will include rough-and-tumble play, collaborative dyad activities (e.g. sack races), and rewards for children for engaging in PA. Elements include behavioral strategies to increase children's PA, emotional regulation, monitoring, adaptive step goals, and competition.

  • BehavioralCommunity-enhanced intervention

    This is the standard intervention plus a community element. The local non-profit organization will build upon their existing infrastructure to host regularly planned activities in the community and events at their facility. This will serve to alter the current community social environment and overcome barriers in the built environment to create an environment conducive to fathers exercising with their children.

  • BehavioralDietary modification

    This is an 8-week behavioral intervention. Sessions are planned to take place within the institution's dietary kitchen as well as remotely. The importance of the father/male role model to their child's dietary intake will be emphasized. Topics will be adapted from the Traffic Light Diet. Fathers will not receive any behavioral strategies for increasing PA.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attendance: The percent of the total number of participants who attend each group session.

    Attendance is defined as the number of participants who attend each group session. The outcome will be reported as a percentage calculated as follows: the number who attend each group divided by the number of participants enrolled in the group across all group sessions. This pertains to all study groups.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. The percent of participants who are enrolled at study completion

    Retention is defined as the number of participants who complete the study. Retention will be defined as the number of participants who formally drop out of the study or do not complete any end of study assessments. Retention will be calculated as the number of participants who formally drop out of the study or do not complete any end of study assessments divided by the number of participants who enrolled in the study.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  3. Satisfaction with the program as measured by the Program Satisfaction scale

    The questionnaire will assess overall satisfaction with the program. Specific areas of assessment include helpfulness of the content, enjoyment of the group sessions, and relevance of the information received.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Moderate intensity physical activity as measured by the ActiGraph WGT3X+BT device.

    The ActiGraph WGT3X+BT accelerometer (ActiGraph LLC, Pensacola, FL) will be used to report the number of daily steps taken.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. The number of steps participants take daily as measured by the Fitbit Charge device.

    The Fitbit Charge will be used to measure the child's daily step count. Children will wear the Fitbit daily on their wrist.

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 8 weeks

  3. Children's perceived support for activity as measured by the Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups (ACTS-MG).

    Children will complete the Activity Support Scale for Multiple Groups (ACTS-MG). Scores range from 9-36, with higher scores indicating more support for physical activity.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  4. Chilren's sedentary behavior as measured by the sedentary behavior questionnaire (SBQ).

    Father's sedentary behavior will be assessed using the sedentary behavior questionnaire (SBQ)

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  5. Strategies parents use to promote dietary intake and physical activity as measured by the Parenting Strategies for Eating and Activity Scale.

    The Parenting Strategies for Eating and Activity Scale which is a 33-item measure of parenting strategies for PA and eating habits. Higher scores indicating more frequent use of perceived paternal control, limit setting, monitoring, reinforcement, permission, and discipline.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  6. Father/father figure involvement in their child's lives as measured by the Index of Paternal Involvement scale.

    Fathers will complete the Index of Paternal Involvement. This 19-item measure assesses fathers' involvement with their children in a variety of ways, such as spending time with the child, being a part of special celebrations and rituals, providing financial, support, and providing discipline). Total scale scores range from 0 to 76 with higher scores indicating higher paternal involvement.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  7. The availability of media devices in the home as measured by the Physical Activity and Media Inventory (PAMI).

    The Physical Activity and Media Inventory (PAMI) is designed to be a self-report inventory of both the availability and accessibility of equipment to support PA and sedentary behavior.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  8. Neighborhood disorder as measured by the Neighborhood Psychosocial Hazards (NPH) scale.

    Physical disorder will be measured via the physical disorder construct of the Neighborhood Psychosocial Hazards (NPH) scale. The NPH is a 12-item scale with higher values indicate more neighborhood psychosocial hazards.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  9. Food consumed by children as measured by the NCI's Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall (ASA24).

    The NCI's Automated Self-Administered 24-hour Recall (ASA24) will be used to estimate daily intake of nutrients and macronutrients, food group servings, and alcohol.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pennington Biomedical Research Center
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808-4124, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Maitland C, Stratton G, Foster S, Braham R, Rosenberg M. A place for play? The influence of the home physical environment on children's physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013 Aug 17;10:99. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-10-99. PubMed 23958282 ↗
  • Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008 Jan;40(1):181-8. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3. PubMed 18091006 ↗
  • Newton RL Jr, Marker AM, Allen HR, Machtmes R, Han H, Johnson WD, Schuna JM Jr, Broyles ST, Tudor-Locke C, Church TS. Parent-targeted mobile phone intervention to increase physical activity in sedentary children: randomized pilot trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 Nov 10;2(4):e48. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3420. PubMed 25386899 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Deidentified data can be shared via request to the study PI.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form, Analytic code

Time frame: IPD is available after findings have been published. Anticipated date is March 2027.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Oct 7, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 7, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07862062
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 7, 2026
Start date
Sep 1, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2026
Completion
Mar 31, 2026
Last update
Oct 7, 2026

Study contacts

Robert L Newton, PhD
principal investigator · Pennington Biomedical

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion