An interventional study of Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC in Heart Failure, sponsored by Sant'Innovation. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-30.
Sponsored by Sant'Innovation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
Heart failure is a common heart condition that often leads to hospital stays and repeat readmissions. When patients leave the hospital, coordinating their care between the hospital and their local healthcare team (family doctor, nurses, cardiologist) can be difficult, and gaps in this coordination can lead to complications or unnecessary re-hospitalizations.
This study, called TEAM-IC, tests a new way of organizing the return home after a hospital stay for heart failure. In this new approach, a dedicated "care coordination nurse" based in a local primary care health center works closely with the patient's usual caregivers and with the hospital team to support the patient during the first three months after discharge. This is compared to the existing standard program (PRADO-IC) currently used in France.
Hypothesis: We believe that organizing the return home around a coordinating nurse embedded in a local health center, with support tailored to each patient's level of frailty, will lead to better follow-up and better care for heart failure patients than the current standard program.
Before testing whether this approach actually improves health outcomes in a larger trial, this study first aims to find out whether such a program is realistic and workable in practice, for example, whether patients and healthcare professionals are willing to take part, whether the organization runs smoothly, and whether the study procedures can be followed as planned.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients randomized to this arm receive the TEAM-IC pathway following hospitalization for heart failure. Before discharge, a care-pathway support nurse (IAP), based in a resource primary care health center (MSP), assesses frailty (SEGA-A scale), non-adherence risk (SPUR), and quality of life (KCCQ-12), then stratifies the patient into one of three follow-up intensity levels. The patient is registered on a regional care-coordination platform (eTICSS) and offered telemonitoring of weight, blood pressure, and heart failure warning signs. The patient's GP and community nurse are informed, receive personalized recommendations and access to online training modules, and are supported by the IAP for 3 months post-discharge, including help with administrative/social care referrals and a cardiology advanced-practice nurse consultation at 1 month. The GP's role as primary caregiver is not modified; the IAP provides additional coordination support alongside standard care.
Other: Intervention Arm - TEAM-IC
Patients randomized to this arm receive the standard PRADO-IC discharge program managed by the French national health insurance (CPAM), with no TEAM-IC coordination support. Before discharge, the IAP still assesses frailty (SEGA-A), non-adherence risk (SPUR), and quality of life (KCCQ-12), but these results do not trigger any specific follow-up actions in this arm. The patient is offered standard telemonitoring and/or advanced-practice nurse (IPA) follow-up as usually available. Home nursing visits and clinical monitoring follow the usual PRADO-IC protocol for 3 months. At month 3, the study team collects outcome data for comparison with the intervention arm: rehospitalization, non-hospitalized decompensation episodes (EPOF signs), NYHA class, BNP level, mortality, guideline-recommended drug prescriptions, KCCQ score, healthcare utilization, and satisfaction questionnaires from the patient, GP, and community nurse
A 3-month post-discharge care pathway for heart failure patients, coordinated by a dedicated care-pathway support nurse (IAP) based in a resource primary care health center (MSP), working alongside the patient's own GP and community nurse. Before discharge, the IAP assesses frailty (SEGA-A scale) and non-adherence risk (SPUR), then stratifies patients into 3 follow-up intensity levels. The IAP registers patients on a regional hospital-community coordination platform (eTICSS), offers telemonitoring of weight, blood pressure and heart failure warning signs, and liaises with the hospital's advanced-practice nurse in cardiology. The GP and community nurse receive personalized recommendations, online training modules, and support for administrative and social care referrals. Unlike the PRADO-IC control arm, the intervention adds an upstream frailty/adherence assessment and a primary-care-based coordinating nurse linked directly to the hospital team.
Overall feasibility of the TEAM-IC care pathway
Overall feasibility of the TEAM-IC care pathway, assessed across four dimensions: 1. organizational feasibility : successful implementation of study circuits (appointment scheduling, data collection) and distribution of subjects across the flow chart; 2. acceptability : distribution of subjects across categories of potentially eligible, eligible, not contacted, refused, and included in the study; 3. protocol adherence : completeness of collected data and attrition rate (consent withdrawal, non-adherence to the program, lost to follow-up); 4. adherence to the projected study timeline : comparison of actual versus planned enrollment and study milestones. As this is a pilot feasibility study, no statistical hypothesis testing is planned for this outcome; results will be described descriptively to inform the design of a future full-scale trial.
Time frame: 3 months
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.