CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07845435Updated Sep 28, 2026

Effects of Therapeutic Positioning in Mechanically Ventilated Preterm Infants

An interventional study of Supine Position and Prone Position in Prematurity, Mechanical Ventilation, sponsored by Mustafa Kemal University. Completed at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 35 Weeks to 37 Weeks. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Mustafa Kemal University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2024, registered Sep 2026).
Updated Sep 28, 2026Newly registeredGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
35 Weeks to 37 Weeks
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of three therapeutic positions on physiological parameters, pain, and comfort in mechanically ventilated preterm infants. A total of 60 preterm infants born between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to the supine, prone, or fetal position group, with 20 infants in each group. Physiological parameters, pain, and comfort were assessed at baseline, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 3 hours after positioning. Pain was assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised, and comfort was assessed using the COMFORTneo scale.

Read the detailed description

Preterm infants receiving mechanical ventilation are exposed to physiological instability, pain, environmental stressors, and reduced comfort during neonatal intensive care. Therapeutic positioning is a non-pharmacological nursing intervention that may support oxygenation, physiological stability, neurobehavioral organization, and comfort.

This three-arm, parallel-group randomized controlled trial was conducted among mechanically ventilated preterm infants born between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation. Infants meeting the eligibility criteria were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to the supine position, prone position, or fetal position group. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random number sequence by an independent researcher.

The assigned position was applied according to a standardized positioning protocol. Ventilator settings were not changed as part of the positioning intervention. Physiological parameters, including heart rate, respiratory rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and body temperature, were recorded at baseline, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 3 hours. Pain was assessed using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised, and comfort was assessed using the COMFORTneo scale at the same time points.

The study was designed to determine whether prone and fetal positioning improve physiological stability, reduce pain, and increase comfort compared with routine supine positioning in mechanically ventilated preterm infants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prematurity, Mechanical Ventilation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Preterm Infant
  • Mechanical Ventilation
  • Therapeutic Positioning
03

In context

Premature Birth

2,554 studies on the registry are indexed under Premature Birth; 498 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 84 across 1,689 interventional studies indexed under Premature Birth.

Browse Premature Birth studies →

Lead sponsor

Mustafa Kemal University is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 18 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
35 Weeks to 37 Weeks
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Preterm infants born between 35 and 37 weeks of gestation
  • Receiving invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilatory support
  • Clinically stable before positioning
  • No additional comfort-enhancing intervention administered during the study assessment period
  • Written informed consent provided by a parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age below 35 weeks or above 37 weeks
  • Receiving phototherapy during the study assessment period
  • Presence of a congenital anomaly
  • Receiving sedative medication
  • Clinical instability preventing the application of the assigned position
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Supine Position

    Infants assigned to the control group were placed in the supine position. The infant was positioned on the back, with the head maintained in the midline, according to the standardized positioning protocol. The position was maintained during the three-hour assessment period.

    Other: Prone Position · Other: Fetal Position

  • Active comparator
    Prone Position

    Infants assigned to this group were placed in the prone position. The trunk and pelvis were supported, and the head was turned slightly to one side according to the standardized positioning protocol. The position was maintained during the three-hour assessment period.

    Other: Supine Position · Other: Fetal Position

  • Active comparator
    Fetal Position

    Infants assigned to this group were placed in a flexion-based fetal position. The upper and lower extremities were maintained in flexion, and appropriate positioning supports were used to mimic the intrauterine posture. The position was maintained during the three-hour assessment period.

    Other: Supine Position

Interventions

  • OtherSupine Position

    Standardized placement of the mechanically ventilated preterm infant in the supine position for three hours.

  • OtherProne Position

    Standardized placement of the mechanically ventilated preterm infant in the prone position, with support of the trunk and pelvis, for three hours.

  • OtherFetal Position

    Standardized flexion-based positioning of the mechanically ventilated preterm infant using appropriate support materials to mimic the intrauterine posture for three hours.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain Level Assessed Using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised

    Pain Level Assessed Using the Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 3 hours after positioning

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comfort Level Assessed Using the COMFORTneo Scale

    Comfort was assessed using the COMFORTneo scale. The scale evaluates alertness, calmness or agitation, respiratory response or crying, body movement, muscle tone, and facial tension. The total score ranges from 6 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater distress and lower comfort.

    Time frame: Baseline, 30 minutes, 2 hours, and 3 hours after positioning

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Çukurova Üniversitesi
    Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Registered
First appeared on the registry. No changes since
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    First appeared on the registry

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07845435
Lead sponsor
Mustafa Kemal University
Responsible party
EMEL DEMIR (associate professor, Mustafa Kemal University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 28, 2026
Start date
Feb 7, 2024
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2025
Completion
Oct 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Rana Rehap SERT
principal investigator · Istanbul Sabahattin Zaim University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion