ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07839858VeRavieUpdated Sep 24, 2026

A Study of Real-world Use and Effectiveness of Cytoreductive Strategies for the Treatment of Second-line Polycythemia Vera in France

An observational study in Polycythemia Vera, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 51 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals (part of Novartis) · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
237
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-15

Among 12 studies in Polycythemia Vera by Novartis — none open to participants now, 2 under way, none of them phase 3. Polycythemia Vera · Novartis.

Started
2025
the only one that year
Observational
4 of 12
none open now
Registered
12th of 12
by date

Among the 12 studies in Polycythemia Vera by Novartis, this one is the only one that started in 2025, is one of 4 observational ones, and was the 12th registered.

Polycythemia Vera

278 studies on the registry are indexed under Polycythemia Vera; 53 are open to participants now.

Browse Polycythemia Vera studies →

Open to participants now

None of the 12 studies in Polycythemia Vera by Novartis is open now. The open studies under Polycythemia Vera, anywhere →

Who these studies take

Of the 42 Polycythemia Vera studies recruiting now, 38 (90%) set no upper age limit and 1 (2%) stops at 75 or younger; 4 take children under 18; 1 takes healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 99 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Download CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: the 12 studies in Polycythemia Vera by Novartis as a file.
02

Study summary

The aim of this study was to assess which cytoreductive treatments are currently administered in standard practice as second-line therapy to patients with polycythemia vera (PV) in France and to find out the reasons physicians switch treatments. In addition, the research aimed to describe real-world effectiveness of second-line cytoreductive therapies and the occurrence of adverse events of special interest.

Study data were collected from the medical charts of patients who initiated a second-line cytoreductive agent for the treatment of PV and received their first dose between 1 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.

03

Conditions studied

  • Polycythemia Vera

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Polycythemia Vera
  • Second-line cytoreductive treatment
  • Real-world data
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with PV who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patient diagnosed with PV after 01 Jan 2014 according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria.
  2. Patient ≥ 18 years of age at the time of PV diagnosis.
  3. Patient who received a first dose of a cytoreductive treatment between 01 Jan 2022 and 31 Dec 2023.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Patient alive at study initiation who opposed to data use for research purposes.
  2. Patient who died before study initiation and who had opposed to data use for research purpose prior to their death.
  3. Patient who took part in an interventional clinical trial(s) between 01 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Line of therapy

A line of therapy is one course of treatment, which may combine several drugs. First-line is the first course given; second-line follows when that stops working or is not tolerated.

“Two prior lines” means two courses that count separately under the study’s rules — not simply two drugs. Ask the study team if you are unsure how yours are counted.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
237 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • PV Cohort

    Adult PV patients who received a first dose of a second-line cytoreductive treatment between 1 January 2022 and 31 December 2023.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients per Type of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients per Type of First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Proportion of Patients per Type of Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  3. Initial Dose of Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Received for Each Type of Treatment

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  4. Duration of Each Line of Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline up to approximately 12 months

  5. Duration Between PV Diagnosis and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation

    Time frame: Baseline

  6. Proportion of Patients With Treatment Interruptions and Dose Modification During Second-line Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  7. Proportion of Patients by Number of Dose Modifications During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Dose modifications were categorized as an increase or decrease in dose.

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  8. Proportion of Patients Who Permanently Discontinued Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  9. Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  10. Proportion of Patients by Reasons for Switching to Third-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  11. Proportion of Patients per Type of Concomitant Treatment/Procedure During Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Up to approximately 12 months

  12. Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as: * Prior to first-line treatment * Prior to second-line treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  13. Proportion of Patients Who had a Bone Marrow Biopsy Following PV Diagnosis and the Timing of Bone Marrow Biopsy in Relation to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Timing of bone marrow biopsy was categorized as: * During second-line treatment * After second-line treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Proportion of Patients Achieving Hematocrit Control

    Hematocrit control was defined as hematocrit \< 45% with the absence of phlebotomy eligibility during the last 3 months.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  15. Proportion of Patients Achieving Clinicohematologic Response

    Proportion of patients achieving clinicohematologic response according to the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (complete or partial). Complete clinicohematologic response was defined by: * Hematocrit \< 45% without phlebotomies during the last 3 months, and * Platelet count ≤ 400 x 10\^9/L, and * White blood cell count ≤ 10 x 10\^9/L, and * Normal spleen size evaluated by physical examination and/or by imaging. Partial clinicohematologic response was defined by: In patients who do not fulfill the criteria for complete response, hematocrit \< 45% without phlebotomy for 3 months OR response in 3 of the other criteria.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  16. Proportion of Patients Achieving Symptom Response

    Proportion of patients achieving symptom response according to the ELN criteria. Symptom response is defined as an absolute 10-point improvement in the Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form - Total Symptom Score (MPN-SAF TSS). The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  17. Proportion of Patients Achieving Molecular Response

    Proportion of patients achieving molecular response according to the ELN criteria (complete or partial). Complete molecular response was defined by the reduction of any specific molecular abnormality to undetectable levels. Partial molecular response was defined by: * A reduction of ≥ 50% from baseline value in patients with \< 50% mutant allele burden at baseline OR * A reduction of ≥ 25% from baseline value in patients with ≥ 50% mutant allele burden at baseline.

    Time frame: Approximately 6 months

  18. Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Disease Progression Events

    Disease progression events include acute myeloid leukemia, myelofibrosis, and PV related death.

    Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months

  19. Proportion of Patients With Occurrence of Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Events

    Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events include arterial thrombotic, venous thrombotic, and hemorrhage.

    Time frame: Up to 6 approximately months

  20. Proportion of Patients by Sex

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  21. Age

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  22. Proportion of Patients With Cardiovascular and Thromboembolic Risk Factors

    Time frame: Baseline

  23. Proportion of Patients With a History of Medical Conditions

    Medical conditions include cancer, autoimmune disease, and opportunistic infection.

    Time frame: Baseline

  24. Proportion of Patients With Other Ongoing Comorbidities

    Time frame: Baseline

  25. Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Prior to First-line Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  26. Proportion of Patients per Number and Type of Thromboembolic and Hemorrhagic Events Between First- and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  27. Duration Between Most Recent Thromboembolic or Hemorrhagic Event and Initiation of First and Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  28. Proportion of Patients by Reason for Initiating First-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Baseline

  29. Proportion of Patients per Type of Pre-specified Emergency Treatment/Procedure Administered Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment Initiation

    Emergency treatments/procedures include antiplatelet drugs, anticoagulants, and phlebotomies.

    Time frame: Baseline

  30. Proportion of Patients by Number of Phlebotomies Required in the 3 Months Prior to Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  31. Proportion of Patients by PV Symptoms

    PV symptoms include splenomegaly, pruritus, fatigue, and bone pain.

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  32. MPN-SAF TSS Score

    The MPN-SAF TSS (or MPN-10) is a validated patient-reported questionnaire that measures symptom burden in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. The instrument assesses 10 key disease-related symptoms, each scored from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable), generating a total score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater symptom burden, and changes in the score are commonly used to evaluate clinical benefit and treatment response in both clinical practice and clinical trials.

    Time frame: Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  33. Hemoglobin Level

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  34. Hematocrit Level

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  35. Leukocyte Count

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  36. Platelet Count

    Time frame: Within the 3 months preceding Day 1 (first dose of second-line cytoreductive treatment)

  37. Proportion of Patients by Type of Mutation

    Time frame: Baseline

  38. Mutant Allele Burden

    Mutant allele burden is a molecular measure that quantifies the proportion of cells harboring a specific disease-associated mutation (e.g., JAK2 V617F, CALR, or MPL) within a patient sample. It is usually reported as the variant allele frequency (VAF), representing the percentage of mutant alleles among all alleles analyzed, and serves as an indicator of the size of the malignant clone in myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). Changes in mutant allele burden may provide insight into the biological activity of the disease and the molecular effects of therapy. Mutant allele burden was categorized as ≥ 50% or \< 50%.

    Time frame: Baseline

  39. Proportion of Patients With Pre-specified Adverse Events of Special Interest Occurring After Initiation of the Second-line Cytoreductive Treatment

    Pre-specified adverse events of special interest include thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, infection, weight gain, psychological disorders, nonmelanoma skin cancer, skin disorders, and autoimmune disorders.

    Time frame: Up to 12 months

07

Study locations

51 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bayonne, Bayonne Cedex 64109, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint Priest Jarez, Pays de la Loire Region 42270, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aix-en-Provence, 13616, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Angers, 49933, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Antony, 92160, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Arras, 62022, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aurillac, 15000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Avignon, 84000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Béziers, 34525, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bordeaux, 33076, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brest, 29200, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Cesson-Sévigné, 35576, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Challes-les-Eaux, 73190, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chambéry, 73000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dunkirk, 59240, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Essey-lès-Nancy, 54270, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Bouscat, 33110, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Chesnay, 78150, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Coudray, 28630, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Mans, 72000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Libourne, 33505, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marseille, 13005, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montpellier, 34295, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Morlaix Cdex, 29672, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nantes, 44277, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nîmes, 30029, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Orléans, 45100, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75013, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75014, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75015, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75475, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Perpignan, 66046, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pessac, 33604, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pierre-Bénite, 69310, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Quimper, 29000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rennescedex9, 35033, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rochefort, 17301, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Roubaix, 59100, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Saint-Brieuc, 22000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    St-Malo, 35400, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Strasbourg, 67085, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Trévenans, 90400, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Troyes, 10003, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2025 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 18, 2026
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
StartActual
Mar 13, 2025
Primary completionActual
Oct 14, 2025
CompletionActual
Oct 14, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07839858
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 24, 2026
Start date
Mar 13, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 14, 2025
Completion
Oct 14, 2025
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion