ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06278324Updated Aug 7, 2025

Effectiveness of a Nasal Spray on Viral Respiratory Infections

An interventional study of Nasal Spray HSV Treatment in Acute Respiratory Tract Infection, Flu, Human and COVID-19, sponsored by CEN Biotech. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 84 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-07.

Sponsored by CEN Biotech · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
76
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 84 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There is no cure for cold or flu, most people recover in about within two weeks. Paracetamol may be used to reduce aches or treat fever, headache, or body aches. Antiviral solutions ranging from simple universal saline solutions to novel compounds have been proposed to provide a temporary barrier to prevent viral infection and propagation.

The nasal spray "Humer Stop Virus" is indicated in patients presented with early symptoms of viral respiratory infection. This spray forms a protective barrier in the nasal mucosa which is the main entry of the upper air respiratory system viruses. The spray traps the viruses and helps the organism to eliminate them before they multiply themselves.

This clinical investigation is conducted to assess the performance, clinical benefit and safety of this nasal spray in patients with early symptoms of acute respiratory disease whether or not infection is related to common cold, flu or COVID virus. Indeed, presence of early symptoms of acute respiratory infection does not always imply viral infectionAntigen self-tests are available to confirm viral infection with flu viruses or severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV-2). However, influenza and other winter viruses are not systematically searched for in general population, because this is of neither collective nor individual interest. To be as pragmatic as possible, we chose to assess performance and safety of the nasal spray on intended users in real conditions. Patients with early symptoms of cold, flu or COVID, are enrolled regardless their PCR test positivity confirming viral infection at the time of enrollment. For study needs, the primary endpoint, which aims to assess the performance of the nasal spray in terms of stopping the viral infection, is assessed in a subgroup of patients with a positive PCR test with flu, COVID or common cold virus in the nasal sample collected at enrollment.

Read the detailed description

Patients are recruited at the study site by the principal investigator, who gives a brief presentation of the study. Eligible, informed patients who sign a consent form are included and randomized.

All patients undergo three nasal swabs: at the time of enrolment, then 24 hours and 84 hours later, and complete a daily questionnaire on a secure mobile application dedicated to patient reported outcomes to assess their symptoms and provide information on any analgesic or antipyretic medication they may have been taking.

Patients randomized to the intervention group are asked to use the nasal spray as recommended and to report any difficulties with the device.

A final visit is organized on day 8 at the investigation center under the supervision of the investigator.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Respiratory Tract Infection
  • Flu, Human
  • COVID-19
  • Common Cold

Keywords

  • Nasal spray
03

In context

Influenza, Human

2,356 studies on the registry are indexed under Influenza, Human; 184 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 76 is below the median of 227 across 1,957 interventional studies indexed under Influenza, Human.

Browse Influenza, Human studies →

Lead sponsor

CEN Biotech is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 84 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • With early symptoms of respiratory infection (onset less than 48 hours before inclusion) of mild to moderate intensity (TSS ≥ 2 and \< 9).
  • Having a mobile phone allowing using the patient reported outcome App. (NursTrial®).
  • Patient able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions, including answering a questionnaire on a mobile phone, as required by protocol.
  • Signed .
  • Affiliated to a French Health insurance scheme.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concomitant disease or infection that could interfere with participation in the study: acute ear, nose, and throat and respiratory tract disease other than the common cold, flu or COVID (e.g., tonsillitis, otitis, bronchitis) and chronic sinusitis or allergic rhinitis, or other reasons for nasal obstruction and other past or present conditions and treatments that could influence symptom scores.
  • Severe nasal septum deviation or other conditions that could cause nasal obstruction such as the presence of nasal polyps.
  • Known or suspected intolerance or , including history of allergies, to any component device material, any history of drug hypersensitivity.
  • Concomitant treatment that might impair the trial results (i.e., decongestants, local anesthetics, topical , saline solution) during the seven days prior to inclusion.
  • Smokers.
  • Have a condition or is taking a medication that the Investigator and/or designee believes could jeopardize the safety of the subject, would interfere with the evaluation, or confound the interpretation of the study results.
  • Non-compliant or may not respect the constraints imposed by the protocol.
  • Enrolled in another clinical trial or being in a period of exclusion from a previous clinical trial;
  • Woman of childbearing age (except menopausal, hysterectomised, sterilized) not using effective (oral contraceptives, intra-uterine device, contraceptive implant, or condoms).
  • Person belonging to a population referred to in articles 64 (incapacitated subjects), 65 (minors), 66 (pregnant or breastfeeding women), 67 (persons performing mandatory military service, persons deprived of liberty, persons who, due to a judicial decision) and 68 (patients in emergency) of the Medical Device Regulation.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
76 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Nasal spray Humer Stop Virus (HSV)

    Patients treated with the nasal spray Humer Stop Virus (HSV) . Analgesics and antipyretics are authorized. Any other nasal spray, nasal cleansing (saline, water or other), and inhalation are prohibited

    Device: Nasal Spray HSV Treatment

  • No intervention
    Control

    Analgesics and antipyretics are authorized. Any nasal spray, nasal cleansing (saline, water or other), and inhalation are prohibited

Interventions

  • DeviceNasal Spray HSV Treatment

    Nasal treatment with the nasal spray Humer Stop Virus for 7 days, 2-3 puffs per nostril, 3-4 per day, space applications 4 hours apart.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of nasal spray in eliminating viruses

    0-84 hours areas under the curve (AUC) of viral load in patients with a positive virus infection at enrollment. Positive viral infection means that at least one of the following respiratory viruses has been detected in nasal sample collected at enrollment: SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A virus, Influenza B virus, Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) A/B, Metapneumovirus (MPV), Adenovirus A/B/C/D/E/F, Rhinovirus A/B/C, Parainfluenza virus 1/2/3/4, Bocavirus 1/2/3/4, Coronavirus 229E, Coronavirus NL63, Coronavirus OC43 Virus load is measured using Reverse Transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR).

    Time frame: 84 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in viral load

    Percentage reduction in viral load in patients with a positive virus infection at enrollment. Virus load is measured as described in primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours and 84 hours

  2. Rate of patients cleared from viral infection

    Percentage of patients with a positive virus infection at enrollment totally cleared from viral infection, meaning with negative viral load. Virus load is measured as described in primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours and 84 hours

  3. Rate of patients with improved viral infection

    Percentage of patients with a positive virus infection at enrollment who present lower viral load. Virus load is measured as described in primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours and 84 hours

  4. Rate of patients with worsening viral infection

    Percentage of patients with a positive virus infection at enrollment who present higher viral load. Virus load is measured as described in primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours and 84 hours

  5. Rate of patients with new viral infection

    Percentage of patients with a virus infection not present at enrollment. Virus load is measured as described in primary outcome.

    Time frame: 24 hours and 84 hours

  6. Changes in symptom severity

    Symptom severity is assessed using the Total Symptom Score, which consists of 7 questions, each rated on a 4 point-Likert scale (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3). The score ranges from 0 to 28.

    Time frame: day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, day 7

  7. Duration of illness

    Number of days between onset of symptoms and last day before first day with Total Symptom Score returns to 0. Total Symptom Score is measured as described in outcome 7

    Time frame: day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, day 7

  8. Time to clinical improvement of the symptoms

    Number of days between day 1 and the first day the patient reports "much improved" or "very much improved," items of the 7 point-Likert scale assessing the patient's global impression of improvement

    Time frame: day 1, day 2, day 3, day 4, day 5, day 6, day 7

  9. Adverse event occurence

    Percentage of patients with adverse events between consent signature and final visit.

    Time frame: day 8

Other outcomes

  1. Patient opinion of nasal spray

    Patients treated with the nasal spray complete a satisfaction questionnaire designed for the study, and their responses are assessed using Likert scales.

    Time frame: day 8

  2. Nasal spray safety

    Frequency and description of device deficiencies or difficulties in using the nasal spray reported by patients treated with the nasal spray.

    Time frame: Day 8

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Cen Experimental
    Dijon, Burgundy 21000, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2024 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 14 months.

Of 166 interventional studies with no phase under Influenza, Human, half reached primary completion within 6 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 3 and three quarters within 16. This study's 14 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 19, 2024
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
StartActual
Jan 26, 2024
Primary completionActual
Apr 16, 2025
CompletionActual
May 16, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06278324
Lead sponsor
CEN Biotech
Collaborators
Urgo Research, Innovation & Development
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 26, 2024
Start date
Jan 26, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 16, 2025
Completion
May 16, 2025
Last update
Aug 7, 2025

Study contacts

Christelle FOUCHER
study director · Urgo Research, Innovation & Development

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion