ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07827573kalitERAUpdated Nov 3, 2026

A Study to Learn How Well Participants With a Specific Type of Early Breast Cancer (ER-Positive, HER2-Negative) Tolerate and Stay on Treatment With Giredestrant and How They Feel During Treatment

A Phase 3 interventional study of Giredestrant in Early Breast Cancer, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer and HER2-Negative Breast Cancer, sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche. Recruiting at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-03.

Sponsored by Hoffmann-La Roche · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 3, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in Canada+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
1,500
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate treatment adherence, tolerability, and patient-reported outcomes of participants with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer (eBC) who are treated with giredestrant.

The study will have two cohorts. Cohort A will comprise a broad upfront patient population with low-, medium-, or high-risk eBC. Cohort B will comprise patients with medium- or high-risk eBC who have completed adjuvant treatment with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) (abemaciclib or ribociclib) and endocrine therapy and who are now switching to giredestrant monotherapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Early Breast Cancer
  • Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
  • HER2-Negative Breast Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 1,500 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Hoffmann-La Roche is the lead sponsor of 2,101 studies on the registry; 87 are open to participants now.

Of its 330 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 248 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • confirmed diagnosis of ER-positive, -negative, Stage I-III, breast cancer
  • Definitive surgery of primary breast tumor(s) and axillary lymph nodes (axillary lymph node dissection and/or sentinel lymph node )
  • Participants must have completed any prior chemotherapy before enrollment, if given
  • (ECOG) Performance Status 0, 1, or 2
  • Adequate organ function
  • Men and pre- or perimenopausal women must receive a concurrent approved luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding, or intending to become pregnant during the study or within the timeframe in which is required
  • Diagnosis of inoperable locally advanced or Stage IV breast cancer
  • History of any prior (ipsilateral and/or contralateral) invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)
  • Planned surgery during the study
  • Prior treatment with giredestrant, selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs), or endocrine agents
  • Active cardiac disease or history of cardiac dysfunction
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

HER2

HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.

In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

ECOG performance status

A scale of how much an illness limits everyday activity. For people being assessed to join a study, scores run from 0 (fully active) to 4; lower is more active.

0
Fully active, no restrictions.
1
Limited in strenuous activity, but walking and able to do light work, such as housework or office work.
2
Walking and able to look after yourself, but unable to work; up and about more than half of waking hours.
3
Able to look after yourself only in part; in bed or a chair more than half of waking hours.
4
Unable to look after yourself at all; in bed or a chair all day.

Studies most often ask for 0–1 or 0–2. Your doctor gives the score; the WHO scale uses the same steps. The full scale also has 5, which records death.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
1,500 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort A: Upfront Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Population

    Participants will receive giredestrant.

    Drug: Giredestrant

  • Experimental
    Cohort B: Switch Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Population

    Participants will receive giredestrant.

    Drug: Giredestrant

Interventions

  • Participants will receive giredestrant 30 mg orally once a day for up to 5 years.

    Also known as: RO7197597, GDC-9545, RG6171

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Participants who Have Discontinued Giredestrant for any Reason

    Time frame: Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence and Severity of Adverse Events (AEs)

    Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

  2. Treatment Adherence, as Measured by Dose Intensity

    Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

  3. Treatment Adherence, as Measured by Treatment Duration

    Time frame: Up to approximately 5 years

  4. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Joint Pain as Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Symptoms (FACT-ES)

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  5. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Joint Pain Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  6. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Hot Flashes as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  7. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Hot Flashes Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  8. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Vaginal Dryness as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  9. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Vaginal Dryness Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  10. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Sexual Dysfunction as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  11. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Sexual Dysfunction Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  12. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for the Overall Endocrine Symptom Burden as Assessed by FACT-ES Endocrine Symptom Subscale Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  13. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in the Overall Endocrine Symptom Burden Score as Assessed by FACT-ES Endocrine Symptom Subscale Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  14. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Pain as Assessed by Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) Pain Severity Composite Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  15. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Pain as Assessed by the BPI-SF Pain Severity Composite Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  16. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Pain Interference as Assessed by the BPI-SF Pain Interference Composite Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  17. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Pain Interference as Assessed by the BPI-SF Pain Interference Composite Score

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  18. Cohort A: Percentage of Participants Reporting Each Response Option for the Treatment Side-Effect Bother Single-Item GP5 (General Physical Well-Being Item 5) as Assessed by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  19. Cohort A: Change From Baseline in the Treatment Side-Effect Bother Single-Item GP5 as Assessed by FACT-G

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  20. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Joint Pain Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  21. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Hot Flashes Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  22. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Vaginal Dryness Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  23. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Sexual Dysfunction Score as Assessed by FACT-ES

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  24. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Endocrine Therapy-Specific Symptom Burden as Assessed by the FACT-ES Endocrine Symptom Subscale Score

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  25. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Pain-Related Burden as Assessed by the BPI-SF Pain Severity Composite Score

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  26. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Pain-Related Burden as Assessed by the BPI-SF Pain Interference Composite Score

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  27. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement in Global Treatment Bother as Assessed by the Single-Item GP5 From the FACT-G

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  28. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Physical Function as Assessed by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Item Library 492 (EORTC IL 492)

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  29. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Physical Function Score as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  30. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Role Function as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  31. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Role Function Score as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  32. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Cognitive Function as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  33. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in Cognitive Function Score as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  34. Cohort A: Mean Absolute Score for Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  35. Cohort A: Mean Change From Baseline in HRQoL Score as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: At prespecified timepoints from Baseline until approximately 5 years

  36. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Physical Function as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  37. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Role Function as Assessed by EORTC IL 492

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  38. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in Cognitive Function as Assessed by EORTC IL 492 Subscale Score

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  39. Cohort B: Percentage of Participants Categorized as Improved, Stable, or Worsened in HRQoL as Assessed by EORTC IL 492 Subscale Score

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — For eligible studies, qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level clinical data. See Roche's commitment to transparency of clinical study information here: https://go.roche.com/data_sharing

09

Updates

2 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Nov 3, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Canada
Show site
  • CHU de Québec - Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement · Québec, Canada
Nov 3, 2026
Start date
Oct 30, 2026→Dec 11, 2026
Nov 3, 2026
Show all 2 updates
  1. Nov 3, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in Canada
    Show site
    • CHU de Québec - Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement · Québec, Canada
    Start date Oct 30, 2026→Dec 11, 2026
  2. Oct 15, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07827573
Lead sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 18, 2026
Start date
Dec 11, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 3, 2026

Study contacts

Reference Study ID Number: BO46775 https://forpatients.roche.com/ No attachments to email below.
Contact
global-roche-genentech-trials@gene.com
888-662-6728 (U.S. Only)
Fastest response: use the inquiry form. https://www.gene.com/contact-us/submit-medical-inquiry
Contact
Clinical Trials
study director · Hoffmann-La Roche

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Giredestrant

Start the discussion