ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07825870Updated Sep 17, 2026

Outcomes of Fluoroscopy-Guided Transdiscal Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis for Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain.

An interventional study of Chemical Neurolysis in Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain, Pancreatic Cancer and Gastric Cancer, sponsored by Sahiwal medical college sahiwal. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-17.

Sponsored by Sahiwal medical college sahiwal · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective study is to learn whether fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal splanchnic nerve neurolysis can safely reduce severe upper abdominal cancer pain in adults with pancreatic, gastric, or hepatobiliary cancer. The study will also assess whether this procedure can reduce the need for opioid pain medicines and improve patients' functional status and quality of life.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the procedure reduce patients' pain one month after treatment?

Does it reduce the amount of opioid pain medication patients need?

Does it improve functional status and quality of life?

What complications or side effects occur after the procedure?

How long does pain relief last, and how often is repeat treatment needed?

Participants will:

First receive a diagnostic splanchnic nerve block with local anesthetic.

If the diagnostic block provides at least 50% pain relief, undergo transdiscal splanchnic nerve neurolysis using fluoroscopy guidance.

Receive a neurolytic agent (absolute alcohol or phenol) through a needle placed at the T11-T12 or T12-L1 level.

Have their pain, opioid medication use, functional status, complications, and satisfaction assessed before treatment and during follow-up.

Complete follow-up assessments at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after the procedure.

Complete a quality-of-life questionnaire before treatment and at 1 month.

The primary outcome will be the change in pain score on the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale at 1 month after the procedure.

02

Conditions studied

  • Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain
  • Pancreatic Cancer
  • Gastric Cancer
  • Hepatobiliary Cancer

Keywords

  • Cancer Pain
  • Upper Abdominal Cancer Pain
  • Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis
  • Transdiscal Splanchnic Nerve Neurolysis
  • Opioid-Sparing Analgesia
03

In context

Pancreatic Neoplasms

3,896 studies on the registry are indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms; 1,007 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 47 across 2,932 interventional studies indexed under Pancreatic Neoplasms.

Browse Pancreatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sahiwal medical college sahiwal is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 7 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years. Confirmed diagnosis of pancreatic, gastric, or hepatobiliary with epigastric/upper abdominal pain.

Baseline NRS ≥ 7 despite optimized pharmacotherapy, or intolerable opioid side effects.

≥ 50% pain relief on diagnostic splanchnic nerve block. Able to provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Coagulopathy ( > 1.5, \< 50,000/µL). Local or systemic infection. Uncontrolled hypotension or severe cardiopulmonary compromise precluding prone positioning.

Intestinal obstruction. Known allergy to contrast, local anesthetic, or the neurolytic agent. Patient refusal.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Chemical Neurolysis

    Participant will undergo chemical neurolysis using the study specified neurolytic agent for management of chronic pain. the intervention will be administered according to study protocol, with participant followed prospectively for pain relief and treatment related outcomes

    Procedure: Chemical Neurolysis

Interventions

  • ProcedureChemical Neurolysis

    Chemical neurolysis will be performed using the study-specified neurolytic agent (alcohol or phenol) to provide pain relief in patients with chronic pain. The procedure will be performed under appropriate clinical and imaging guidance according to the study protocol. Participants will be followed prospectively to assess pain relief, duration of analgesia, functional outcomes, and procedure-related adverse events

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in pain intensity

    Pain intensity will be assessed using the 0-10 Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), where 0 represents no pain and 10 represents the worst imaginable pain. The change in NRS pain score from baseline will be assessed following fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal splanchnic nerve neurolysis.

    Time frame: Baseline to 1 month after the procedure

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months

  2. Technical success of neurolysis

    Successful completion of fluoroscopy-guided transdiscal splanchnic nerve neurolysis as intended according to the study protocol.

    Time frame: During the procedure

  3. Opioid consumption

    Change in daily opioid consumption expressed as oral morphine milligram equivalents (MME) compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week, 1 month,

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ. 2007 Oct 20;335(7624):806-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD. PubMed 17947786 ↗
  • Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365. PubMed 8433390 ↗
  • Goyal S, Kumar A, Goyal D, Attar P, Bhandari B, Purohit G, Mahiswar AP, Gupta S. Efficacy of splanchnic nerve neurolysis in the management of upper abdominal cancer pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian J Anaesth. 2023 Dec;67(12):1036-1050. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_439_23. Epub 2023 Dec 13. PubMed 38343676 ↗
  • Luo L, Cao X, Qiu M, Zhu M, Yan Y, Zhang D, Zhang X. Splanchnic nerve block via transdiscal and paraspinal approach in the treatment of pain in advanced pancreatic cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Sep 19;104(38):e44250. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000044250. PubMed 40988238 ↗
  • Yanaizumi R, Nagamine Y, Harada S, Kuramochi T, Ota S, Abe Y, Nakagawa M, Kamijima K, Hayashi M, Tazawa T, Ogawa K, Goto T. Efficacy and Safety of Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block via Transintervertebral Disc Approach to Retrocrural Space: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Pain Ther. 2022 Dec;11(4):1359-1372. doi: 10.1007/s40122-022-00432-7. Epub 2022 Sep 28. PubMed 36169799 ↗
  • Cai Z, Zhou X, Wang M, Kang J, Zhang M, Zhou H. Splanchnic nerve neurolysis via the transdiscal approach under fluoroscopic guidance: a retrospective study. Korean J Pain. 2022 Apr 1;35(2):202-208. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2022.35.2.202. PubMed 35354683 ↗
  • Kong YG, Shin JW, Leem JG, Suh JH. Computed Tomography (CT) Simulated Fluoroscopy-Guided Transdiscal Approach in Transcrural Celiac Plexus Block. Korean J Pain. 2013 Oct;26(4):396-400. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2013.26.4.396. Epub 2013 Oct 2. PubMed 24156008 ↗
  • Plancarte-Sanchez R, Mayer-Rivera F, del Rocio Guillen Nunez M, Guajardo-Rosas J, Acosta-Quiroz CO. [Transdiscal percutaneous approach of splanchnic nerves]. Cir Cir. 2003 May-Jun;71(3):192-203. Spanish. PubMed 14617407 ↗
  • Dong D, Zhao M, Zhang J, Huang M, Wang Y, Qi L, Wan CF, Yu X, Song T. Neurolytic Splanchnic Nerve Block and Pain Relief, Survival, and Quality of Life in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesthesiology. 2021 Oct 1;135(4):686-698. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003936. PubMed 34398950 ↗
  • Shwita AH, Amr YM, Okab MI. Comparative Study of the Effects of the Retrocrural Celiac Plexus Block Versus Splanchnic Nerve Block, C-arm Guided, for Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Tumors on Pain Relief and the Quality of Life at a Six-month Follow Up. Korean J Pain. 2015 Jan;28(1):22-31. doi: 10.3344/kjp.2015.28.1.22. Epub 2015 Jan 2. PubMed 25589943 ↗
  • Zhong W, Yu Z, Zeng JX, Lin Y, Yu T, Min XH, Yuan YH, Chen QK. Celiac plexus block for treatment of pain associated with pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pain Pract. 2014 Jan;14(1):43-51. doi: 10.1111/papr.12083. Epub 2013 May 20. PubMed 23682788 ↗
  • 2. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today-Pakistan. GLOBOCAN 2022. Lyon, France: IARC; 2024
  • van den Beuken-van Everdingen MH, Hochstenbach LM, Joosten EA, Tjan-Heijnen VC, Janssen DJ. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients With Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 Jun;51(6):1070-1090.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.340. Epub 2016 Apr 23. PubMed 27112310 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07825870
Lead sponsor
Sahiwal medical college sahiwal
Responsible party
Muhammad Shahid (Muhammad Shahid, Sahiwal medical college sahiwal) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 17, 2026
Start date
Sep 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 20, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 20, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 17, 2026

Study contacts

Umer Hussain, MBBS
Contact
mumerhussain775@gmail.com
923116467002
Muhammad Shahid, MBBS, FCPS
Contact
shahidnishtar@gmail.com
923336173056

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion