ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07820553CLARITY WP1Updated Sep 15, 2026

Building a Computational Model of Auditory Hallucinations

An observational study in Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder, Schizophrenia and Disorders With Psychotic Feature and Psychosis, sponsored by King's College London. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-15.

Sponsored by King's College London · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
146
Ages
16 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Some people hear voices or sounds that other people cannot hear; these are called auditory hallucinations. The study aims to understand what is happening in the brain when this occurs and will use brain scans to learn more. Greater understanding should help develop better treatments in the future.

Read the detailed description

Psychotic disorders, including schizophrenia and bipolar disorder with psychotic features, are severe mental health conditions that significantly diminish quality of life and place a substantial economic burden on society. In England, the total societal cost of schizophrenia is estimated at £11.8 billion per year, with the public sector bearing approximately £7.2 billion of this cost. People with lived experience of psychosis (PWLEP) may experience a range of symptoms, including positive symptoms such as hallucinations and delusions, negative symptoms such as affective flattening, and cognitive impairments, including difficulties with attention, memory and executive function.

Auditory hallucinations, a common and disruptive symptom of psychotic disorders, are typically experienced as hearing voices and occur in approximately 75% of PWLEP. These voices are often intrusive and may be critical, threatening, or commanding, and can be associated with an increased risk of suicide. Whilst antipsychotic treatments, which primarily act through dopamine receptor antagonism, can be effective, they are often associated with significant side effects, and the response to antipsychotic treatment is insufficient in around 40% of patients. There is therefore an urgent need to better understand the mechanisms underlying auditory hallucinations to identify more effective treatment targets and develop novel therapies that act through mechanisms other than dopamine receptor antagonism.

A key avenue for understanding auditory hallucinations is examining disruptions in excitatory-inhibitory (E/I) balance, a fundamental mechanism in neural processing. Post-mortem and in vivo electrophysiological studies implicate dysregulated cortical microcircuits in psychosis, where excitatory pyramidal cells (signalling using glutamate) and inhibitory interneurons (signalling using gamma-aminobutyric acid or 'GABA') regulate neural activity. Interactions between these cells generate synchronised neural oscillations across different frequency bands, from low (delta, theta, alpha) to high (beta, gamma) frequencies. These oscillations, which are crucial for coordinating neural activity and supporting cognitive and perceptual function, can also serve as a measure of E/I balance and be assessed in humans using electroencephalography (EEG).

Previous studies have shown that resting-state cortical theta and gamma oscillations are increased, whilst beta oscillations and evoked gamma are reduced in people with psychosis, indicating altered E/I balance in the cortex. Dynamic causal modelling (DCM) is a validated computational technique for inferring E/I imbalance in both rodent models and humans, allowing a more precise estimate of E/I balance in the human brain to be obtained. Applying DCM to EEG and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigms-including resting-state recordings, mismatch negativity (MMN), and the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR)-has previously shown that pyramidal neuron disinhibition in the auditory cortex (primary auditory cortex and related regions) was associated with auditory perceptual symptoms, serving as a measure of hallucinations.

These findings have been demonstrated in those with chronic psychosis. The investigators now propose to measure E/I early in the presentation of a psychotic disorder to show whether this pathophysiology is related to symptoms demonstrated close to the onset of illness.

The aim of this study is to create a computational model of auditory hallucinations using cortical E/I balance in individuals with a psychotic disorder.

Primary Objective:

The principal research objective is to understand differences in brain signalling, specifically in E/I balance in those with auditory hallucinations using a computational model based on EEG measures such as ASSR relative to healthy volunteers without auditory hallucinations, and whether such measures predict changes in auditory hallucination over time.

Secondary Objectives:

The secondary research objectives include testing if levels of brain and blood substances and genetics are related to brain E/I balance in those with auditory hallucinations and healthy controls.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia / Schizoaffective Disorder
  • Schizophrenia and Disorders With Psychotic Feature
  • Psychosis
  • SCHIZOPHRENIA 1 (Disorder)
  • Schizophreni-form Disorder

Keywords

  • schizophrenia
  • EEG
  • E/I balance
  • electrophysiology
  • computational models
  • auditory hallucinations
  • MRI
  • psychosis
  • computational psychiatry
  • neuroimaging
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,563 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 491 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 146 is below the median of 178 across 506 observational studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

King's College London is the lead sponsor of 520 studies on the registry; 126 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

PWLEP: people with auditory perceptual alterations able to get to the study site in London.

Controls: people without psychosis or auditory perceptual alterations able to get to the study site in London.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

PWLEP:

  1. Age 16-65 years.
  2. A score of at least 3 on the state section of the Auditory Perceptual Trait and State scale (APTS).
  3. If using an antipsychotic drug, participants must be on a stable dose of any medication during the baseline measures.
  4. Sufficient understanding of the nature of the study and any hazards of participating in it, or suitable consultee who can understand this and provide an opinion of what the participant's wishes would be if the participant does not have capacity, if appropriate to do so.
  5. Ability to communicate satisfactorily with the investigator and to participate in, and comply with the requirements of, the entire study.
  6. Capacity to give written consent to participate after reading the information and consent form and after having the opportunity to discuss the study with the investigators or their delegates, or suitable consultee who can understand this and provide an opinion of what the participant's wishes would be if the participant does not have capacity, if appropriate to do so.

Healthy controls:

  1. Age 16-65 years.
  2. Sufficient understanding of the nature of the study and any hazards of participating in it, or suitable consultee who can understand this and provide an opinion of what the participant's wishes would be if the participant does not have capacity, if appropriate to do so.
  3. Ability to communicate satisfactorily with the investigator and to participate in, and comply with the requirements of, the entire study.
  4. Capacity to give written consent to participate after reading the information and consent form and after having the opportunity to discuss the study with the investigators or their delegates, or suitable consultee who can understand this and provide an opinion of what the participant's wishes would be if the participant does not have capacity, if appropriate to do so.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

PWLEP:

  1. abnormal history, or laboratory values at the pre-study screening assessment or participation in other research studies that could interfere with the objectives of the study or the safety of the participant, as deemed significant for a study researcher.
  2. Impaired endocrine, cardiac, pulmonary, thyroid, haematological, hepatic, respiratory, neurological, immunological or renal function, or other major disease (e.g. cancer) deemed clinically significant at the time of the study.
  3. Recent history (i.e. in the last 12 months) of epilepsy or seizures.
  4. Homicidal ideation or intent, as judged by a researcher; suicidal ideation, with some intent to act, or suicidal behaviour, as judged by a researcher.
  5. History of drug or alcohol dependence (except for caffeine and nicotine and mild/moderate cannabis dependence) in the 3 months before study start.
  6. Likelihood that the participant will not comply with the requirements of the protocol.
  7. to MRI, EEG or other study procedures (for example history of metal implants or metal pieces entering the body that cannot be removed safely, severe claustrophobia, allergy or skin sensitivity to EEG electrode gel).
  8. Any other condition or disability that would make participation in the study procedures not possible (for example severe vision or hearing impairment).

Healthy controls:

As above, and also:

1. No relevant family history of schizophrenia and psychosis (as judged relevant by a study researcher).

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
146 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • People with lived experience of psychosis (PWLEP)

    Age 16-65 years with experience of auditory perceptual alterations as measured by validated scale and able to consent to the study. On stable dose of antipsychotic medication if using. No recent history of epilepsy or seizure within last 12 months.

  • Control

    Age 16-65 years with no relevant family history of schizophrenia and psychosis (as judged relevant by a study researcher) and able to consent to study. No recent history of epilepsy or seizure within last 12 months.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. E/I balance determined using the computational model based on the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) EEG response.

    Computational model will be created after study end, using EEG data acquired at the baseline study visit.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mismatch Negativity (MMN): E/I balance determined using MMN amplitude and latency measured using EEG.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Relationship between E/I balance and auditory perceptual symptom severity, assessed using the Auditory Perceptual Trait and State Scale.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. EEG Resting-State Activity: Power across frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta, gamma) during resting-state EEG.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Auditory Oddball P300: Amplitude of the P300 event-related potential in response to an auditory oddball, measured using EEG.

    Time frame: Baseline

  5. fMRI Resting-State Connectivity

    E/I balance determined using functional connectivity between key brain regions (e.g., auditory cortex, prefrontal cortex) assessed by resting-state fMRI.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Adams RA, Pinotsis D, Tsirlis K, Unruh L, Mahajan A, Horas AM, Convertino L, Summerfelt A, Sampath H, Du XM, Kochunov P, Ji JL, Repovs G, Murray JD, Friston KJ, Hong LE, Anticevic A. Computational Modeling of Electroencephalography and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Paradigms Indicates a Consistent Loss of Pyramidal Cell Synaptic Gain in Schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2022 Jan 15;91(2):202-215. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2021.07.024. Epub 2021 Aug 10. PubMed 34598786 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Collected anonymised data may be shared with other researchers within and outside the UK as per open science agreements from the funder Wellcome.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2030, 47 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2030
CompletionEst.
Aug 2030
Last update
Sep 15, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 15, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07820553
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 15, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 15, 2026

Study contacts

CLARITY Study Contact
Contact
clarity@kcl.ac.uk
+447871777185
Maria D Paduraru
Contact
maria-diana.paduraru@kcl.ac.uk
020 7848 0100

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion