ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07818369Updated Sep 14, 2026

Synbiotic LA-5 and Agave Inulin for Mild Cognitive Impairment

An interventional study of Synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Agave Inulin) Intervention Type: in Cognitive Impairment, sponsored by Anahuac University. Recruiting at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Anahuac University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This pilot randomized, double-blind, crossover clinical trial will evaluate the effect of a synbiotic containing Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and agave inulin on mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in adults aged 60-75 years attending the Defense Medical Specialties Unit. Forty participants with MCI will be randomized into two groups of 20 participants. The intervention will consist of daily administration of L. acidophilus LA-5 (4 × 10⁹ CFU), 7 g of agave inulin, and almond powder for 12 weeks, while the control group will receive almond powder as the vehicle. After a two-week washout period, participants will cross over to the alternate intervention for an additional 12 weeks.

Cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Memory Alteration Test (M@T), and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). Secondary assessments will explore potential mechanisms of the microbiota-gut-brain axis by measuring fecal L. acidophilus LA-5 and butyrate, as well as serum BDNF and inflammatory biomarkers including IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-α.

The study aims to determine whether synbiotic supplementation improves cognitive performance in older adults with MCI and whether these changes are accompanied by modifications in gut microbial activity, short-chain fatty acid production, neurotrophic signaling, and systemic inflammation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Impairment
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,872 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,119 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 64 across 2,794 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Anahuac University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 60 to 75 years.
  • Presence of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) determined by neuropsychological testing, meeting at least two of the following three established cutoff criteria:
  • (MoCA): 19-26 points.
  • Memory Alteration Test (M@T): 28-37 points.
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): 12-24 points.
  • Ability and willingness to provide written ; consent may be provided by a family member or legal representative when necessary.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of severe cognitive impairment, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, or another neurodegenerative disorder affecting cognition.
  • History of cerebral ischemia, cerebrovascular events, traumatic brain injury, or advanced-stage renal disease.
  • Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Diagnosed dysbiosis or inflammatory bowel disease, including ulcerative colitis or Crohn disease.
  • Use of antibiotics, laxatives, probiotics, or prebiotics within the 3 months prior to enrollment.
  • Habitual consumption of fermented foods or fiber-rich supplements, particularly fiber intake >18 g/day.
  • Excessive alcohol consumption, defined as ≥2 alcoholic drinks per day, or history of alcohol dependence.
  • Chronic use of medications that may interfere with the microbiota-gut-brain axis, including , antipsychotics, or .
  • Recent surgery within the previous 3 months or a planned medical intervention during the study period.
  • Known adverse reaction or to any component of the synbiotic or to almond powder.
  • Uncontrolled chronic stress identified by clinical assessment.
  • Participation in intense physical activity or high-performance sports during the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

MMSE and MoCA

Short tests of memory and thinking, each scored out of 30. Lower scores suggest more difficulty; criteria give a range, either to include people with memory problems or to leave them out.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Synbiotic and Control

    Participants will receive the synbiotic intervention once daily for 12 weeks. The synbiotic consists of 2 g of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 (4 × 10⁹ CFU), 7 g of agave inulin, and 20 g of almond powder dissolved in water. After the first 12-week intervention period, participants will undergo a 2-week washout period and will then cross over to the control intervention, consisting of 29 g of almond powder dissolved in water once daily for 12 weeks.

    Dietary Supplement: Synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Agave Inulin) Intervention Type:

  • Experimental
    Control and Synbiotic

    Participants will receive the control intervention, consisting of 29 g of almond powder dissolved in water once daily for 12 weeks. After a 2-week washout period, participants will cross over to the synbiotic intervention and receive 2 g of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 (4 × 10⁹ CFU), 7 g of agave inulin, and 20 g of almond powder dissolved in water once daily for 12 weeks.

    Dietary Supplement: Synbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Agave Inulin) Intervention Type:

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementSynbiotic (Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 and Agave Inulin) Intervention Type:

    Participants will receive 2 g of Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 (4 × 10⁹ CFU), 7 g of agave inulin, and 20 g of almond powder dissolved in water, administered orally once daily for 12 weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Score

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) will be used to assess changes in global cognitive function. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. A clinically meaningful improvement will be defined as an increase of at least 2 points from baseline, according to the study protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  2. Change in Memory Alteration Test (M@T) Score

    he Memory Alteration Test (M@T) will be used to assess changes in memory function. The total score ranges from 0 to 50 points, with higher scores indicating better memory performance. The test evaluates orientation and several memory domains, including semantic, free-recall, and cued-recall components. A clinically meaningful improvement will be defined as an increase of at least 2 points from baseline.

    Time frame: : Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  3. Change in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) Score

    The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) will be used to assess changes in global cognitive function. The total score ranges from 0 to 30 points, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance. A clinically meaningful improvement will be defined as an increase of at least 1.5 points from baseline, according to the study protocol.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Concentration

    Serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) concentration will be quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Results will be expressed in pg/mL. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher BDNF concentrations indicate greater circulating levels of this neurotrophic factor.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  2. Change in Interleukin-1 Beta (IL-1β) Concentration

    IL-1β concentration will be quantified using ELISA and expressed in pg/mL. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher concentrations indicate greater levels of this pro-inflammatory cytokine.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  3. Change in Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Concentration

    IL-6 concentration will be quantified using ELISA and expressed in pg/mL. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher concentrations indicate greater levels of this pro-inflammatory cytokine.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  4. Change in Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha (TNF-α) Concentration

    TNF-α concentration will be quantified using ELISA and expressed in pg/mL. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher concentrations indicate greater levels of this pro-inflammatory cytokine.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  5. Change in Interleukin-10 (IL-10) Concentration

    IL-10 concentration will be quantified using ELISA and expressed in pg/mL. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher concentrations indicate greater levels of this anti-inflammatory cytokine.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  6. Change in Fecal Butyrate Concentration

    Fecal butyrate concentration will be quantified using gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID). Results will be expressed in mmol/g of fecal sample. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher concentrations indicate greater fecal butyrate production.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

  7. Change in Fecal Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 Count

    Fecal Lactobacillus acidophilus LA-5 will be quantified by colony-forming unit counts using selective MRS culture medium under anaerobic conditions. Results will be expressed as CFU/g of fecal sample. There is no predefined minimum or maximum score. Higher values indicate greater fecal abundance of L. acidophilus LA-5.

    Time frame: Baseline, end of the first intervention phase, and end of the second intervention phase.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Unidad de Especialidades Médicas de la Defensa (UEMD)
    Mexico City, Mexico City 11200, Mexico
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Dec 2026; primary completion for Nov 2027, 10 months later.

Of 1,442 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Cognitive Dysfunction, half reached primary completion within 27 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 10 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,511 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 50.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Nov 30, 2027
Last update
Sep 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07818369
Lead sponsor
Anahuac University
Responsible party
Jose Juan Antonio Ibarra Arias (Principal Investigator, Anahuac University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Antonio Ibarra, PhD
Contact
jose.ibarra@anahuac.mx
52 55 54197603

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion