ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07815366Updated Sep 11, 2026

Effectiveness of Eccentric Cycling Exercise in Ambulatory Rehabilitation for Patients With Cardiopulmonary Diseases: A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial

An interventional study of Eccentric cycling exercise in Eccentric Cycling Exercise Training, sponsored by University of Zurich. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Switzerland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by University of Zurich · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
12
Allocation
Not applicable
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 32 studies in Motor Activity by University of Zurich — 1 open to participants now, 1 under way, none of them phase 3. Motor Activity · University of Zurich.

Planned enrollment
27th of 27
12 · median 28
Started
2026
the only one that year
No phase
24 of 32
1 open now
Registered
32nd of 32
by date

Among the 32 studies in Motor Activity by University of Zurich, this one is the 27th largest by planned enrollment of the 27 interventional ones, is the only one that started in 2026, is one of 24 with no phase, and was the 32nd registered.

By phase

32 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phasethis study24 · 1 open
Observational5 · 0 open
Phase 11 · 0 open
Phase 1/21 · 0 open
Phase 41 · 0 open

By the year they started

First in 2004; this study’s year is marked. 1 started in 2026.

Size and results

Median enrollment 28 across the 27 interventional studies, 47 across the 5 observational. Of the 28 that completed or were terminated, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 32 studies in Motor Activity by University of Zurich, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

In eccentric cycling exercise (ECC), the cyclist must oppose backwards moving pedals on a specialized motor-driven ergometer. Throughout this process, the force applied on the pedals exceeds the torque generated by the lengthening muscle (negative work), concurrently generating and storing elastic recoil energy . During ECC the cyclist is able to reach fourfold higher forces compared to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON). At identical work-rates however, ECC is associated with a lower cardiac output 5 and requires up to 80% less oxygen uptake than CON. Hence, ECC is described as a promising and efficient exercise method with low metabolic costs. ECC exhibits greater effectiveness compared to CON, especially in terms of increasing muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy, six-minute walk distance (6MWD).

Acute studies during cycle ergometries have proven that ECC is effective to provide exercise at beneficial levels with low metabolic demand, even at low intensities in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions, such as pulmonary hypertension or COPD.

However, whether these benefits can be achieved in a real world setting such as an ambulatory rehabilitation is unknown. Therefore, the rational of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ECC vs. standard training in healthy individuals during a three-month time period.

Read the detailed description

In eccentric cycling exercise (ECC), the cyclist must oppose backwards moving pedals on a specialized motor-driven ergometer. Throughout this process, the force applied on the pedals exceeds the torque generated by the lengthening muscle (negative work), concurrently generating and storing elastic recoil energy. During ECC the cyclist is able to reach fourfold higher forces compared to conventional concentric cycling exercise (CON) . At identical work-rates however, ECC is associated with a lower cardiac output 5 and requires up to 80% less oxygen uptake 6 than CON. Hence, ECC is described as a promising and efficient exercise method with low metabolic costs. Some studies suggests that ECC may exhibit greater effectiveness compared to CON, especially in terms of increasing muscle strength, muscle hypertrophy, six-minute walk distance (6MWD).

A loss in muscle mass and sarcopenia is present also in the non-diseased population and is increasing with age. A yearly loss of muscle mass in the general population is around 1% at the age of 40 and increases to 2% at the age of 70. This loss in muscle mass can be accelerated in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary diseases and especially in patients with lung cancer undergoing systemic therapies, mainly as chemotherapy.

A recent systematic review with meta-analysis, including studies with a total of 867 patients with lung cancer, conclusively demonstrated that patients undergoing chemotherapy are at risk for a marked loss of skeletal muscle mass and sarcopenia.14 Another study found in around 50% of their lung cancer patients receiving chemotherapy a significant reduction in muscle cross sectional area.15 Sarcopenia has a high burden of disease and has been found to be associated with significant lower survival in patients, as well as with a range of negative outcomes including disability, frailty, morbidity, and reduced quality of life. To prevent sarcopenia patients with cardiopulmonary disease, and patients undergoing chemotherapy should perform regular exercise training. Supervised exercise training and three months of rehabilitation have been shown to be effective, safe and well-tolerated in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary or pulmonary vascular disease. Therefore, a three-month ambulatory rehabilitation program provides a reliable option for these patients to exercise regularly in a supervised setting.

However, patients with advanced cardiopulmonary diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, or advanced stage lung cancer, often suffer from exercise intolerance. In patients whose cardiopulmonary limitations are so severe that they cannot even reach beneficial exercise intensities, the value of an ambulatory rehabilitation program needs to be carefully considered.

Nevertheless, with the features of ECC, even these patients are able to exercise at beneficial levels while maintaining a low metabolic demand. Previous studies have shown that ECC can be effective, even at low intensities, in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary conditions such as pulmonary hypertension or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Interestingly, patients additionally reported less perceived dyspnea with unchanged leg fatigue. Furthermore, ECC was associated with reduced pulmonary arterial pressure and improved right ventricular function.

However, whether these benefits can be achieved in a real world setting such as an ambulatory rehabilitation is unknown. Therefore, the rational of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of ECC on healthy individuals during a three-month training period.

To study potential underlying physiology and effects of ECC in higher exercise intensities, we will also include an exploratory healthy control group that will train similarly as patients with cardiopulmonary disease on the ECC during three month.

This trial investigates the healthy control group.

03

Conditions studied

  • Eccentric Cycling Exercise Training

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • eccentric cycling
  • rehabilitation
  • exercise
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy participants without known Cardiopulmonary disease.
  • Provided written
  • Wiling to voluntarily exercise for 3 month on the eccentric ergometer without a specific indication for rehabilitation

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow the exercise procedure.
  • Vulnerable participants (e.g. minors, participants incapable of judgment or participants under tutelage) will not be included into the study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
12 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Eccentric cycling

    Eccentric cycling for three month

    Procedure: Eccentric cycling exercise

Interventions

  • ProcedureEccentric cycling exercise

    Participants exercise for three month on an eccentric ergometer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Peak work rate

    Peak work rate will be measured using standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer.

    Time frame: Pre and post the three month exercise persiod

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peak oxygen uptake

    Peak oxygen uptake will be measured using standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. The participant is connected with a metabolic unit via mouth peace. Oxygen uptake will be measured breath by breath.

    Time frame: Pre and post the three month exercise period.

  2. Patient reported perceived dyspnea at peak exercise

    Patient reported perceived dyspnea at peak exercise will be measured using the Borg 10 item scale during standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. At peak exercise the participant will be ask on a scale from 1 to 10 how he would rate the dyspnea

    Time frame: Pre and post three month exercise period

  3. Patient reported perceived leg fatigue

    Patient reported perceived leg fatigue at peak exercise will be measured using the Borg 10 item scale during standardized cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycling ergometer. At peak exercise the participant will be ask on a scale from 1 to 10 how he would rate the leg fatigue.

    Time frame: Pre and post three month exercise period.

  4. Peak quadriceps extension force

    The peak force that the quadriceps can produce during knee extension is measured on a isokinet.

    Time frame: Pre and post three month exercise period.

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Sep 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for May 2027, 7 months after the start.

Of 5,147 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Motor Activity, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 5,207 studies reached it within 17 months; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 36.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 7, 2026
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
StartActual
Sep 7, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jul 1, 2027
Last update
Sep 11, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 11, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07815366
Responsible party
Silvia Ulrich (Prof. Dr. med., University of Zurich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Sep 7, 2026
Primary completion
May 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion