ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07814833Updated Sep 28, 2026

Effectiveness of Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training With and Without Scapular Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Neck Disability in Cervical Spondylosis

An interventional study of Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training and Scapular Stabilization Exercises in Cervical Spondylosis, sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-28.

Sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jun 2026, registered Sep 2026).
  • Started Jun 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Updated Sep 28, 2026Primary outcomes revisedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training with and without scapular stabilization exercises in patients with cervical spondylosis. The study will compare the effects of the two treatment approaches on pain intensity, cervical range of motion and neck disability.

Read the detailed description

Participants with radiologically confirmed cervical spondylosis will be recruited according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 44 participants will be recruited, with 22 participants allocated to each group after accounting for an anticipated 10% loss to follow-up. Participants will be randomly allocated using the sealed envelope method into two groups. Group A will receive pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training combined with scapular stabilization exercises and standard physiotherapy. Group B will receive pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training without scapular stabilization exercises, along with standard physiotherapy. Treatment will be provided three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after completion of the four-week intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Spondylosis

Browse trials for

03

In context

Spondylosis

142 studies on the registry are indexed under Spondylosis; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 60 across 101 interventional studies indexed under Spondylosis.

Browse Spondylosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Ibadat International University, Islamabad is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders aged 40-60 years.
  • Presence of chronic neck pain for ≥3 months with NPRS ≥3.
  • Radiologically confirmed cervical spondylosis, including cervical spine X-ray showing disc space narrowing and/or osteophyte formation.
  • Ability to perform active cervical and shoulder movements without neurological deficits.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and comply with the intervention protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical spine surgery or trauma in the past 6 months.
  • Severe neurological involvement, including cervical myelopathy or severe radiculopathy with motor weakness, gait disturbance, or bowel/bladder involvement.
  • Inflammatory or systemic musculoskeletal disorders, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Current participation in structured neck/shoulder rehabilitation programs.
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions contraindicating exercise, e.g., uncontrolled hypertension or cardiovascular disease.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training + Scapular Stabilization Exerci

    Other: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training · Other: Scapular Stabilization Exercises · Other: Standard Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training + Standard Physiotherapy

    Other: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training · Other: Standard Physiotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherPressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training

    Deep cervical flexor (DCF) training will be performed using a pressure biofeedback unit to facilitate selective activation of the longus colli and longus capitis. Participants will lie supine with hips and knees flexed, with the cuff placed beneath the cervical spine at C4-C5 and inflated to a baseline pressure of 20 mmHg. Gentle cranio-cervical flexion will be performed by nodding and drawing the chin inward while maintaining head contact with the surface and avoiding compensatory superficial muscle activation. Target pressure will progress from 22 mmHg in Week 1 to 24, 26, and 28 mmHg in Weeks 2-4, respectively. Training will consist of 3 sets of 10 repetitions, with 5-second holds in Week 1 progressing to 10-second holds thereafter and 30-60 seconds of rest between sets. Arm lifts will be added in Week 3 and leg marching in Week 4. The intervention will be administered three times weekly for four consecutive weeks.

  • OtherScapular Stabilization Exercises

    Scapular stabilization exercises will be performed progressively for 4 weeks to improve scapular control, alignment, and stabilizer strength. In Week 1, seated scapular retraction and depression will be performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 5-second holds and 60 seconds rest. In Week 2, scapular retraction will progress using light TheraBand resistance for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with controlled movement. In Week 3, wall slides and prone Y and T raises will be performed for 3 sets of 8-10 repetitions. In Week 4, scapular stabilization with shoulder flexion and abduction will be performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions. All exercises will emphasize controlled movement, neutral alignment, and avoidance of compensatory shoulder or trunk movements. Sessions will be conducted three times weekly.

  • OtherStandard Physiotherapy

    Standard physiotherapy will include therapeutic exercises and postural management techniques aimed at reducing pain, improving cervical mobility, flexibility, and functional performance. Cervical range-of-motion exercises including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation will be performed within a pain-free range for 10 repetitions in each direction. Stretching exercises for the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and pectoral muscles will be performed for 20-30 seconds for 3 repetitions. Cervical isometric strengthening exercises including flexion, extension, and lateral flexion will be performed with a 5-10-second hold for 10 repetitions. Postural education and ergonomic advice will also be provided, including instructions regarding proper sitting posture, appropriate head and neck positioning, and avoidance of prolonged static postures. Standard physiotherapy will be provided for approximately 10-15 minutes per session, three times weekly for four consecutive weeks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability - Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Measure: Functional disability related to neck pain measured using the Neck Disability Index.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.

  2. Pain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Neck pain intensity measured using the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Universal Goniometer

    Measure: Cervical Range of Motion - Cervical flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion, and right/left rotation.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Neck Flexor Endurance Test

    Measure: Cervical flexor muscle endurance.

    Time frame: Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hope Physiotherapy Clinic
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • • Tsiringakis G, Dimitriadis Z, Triantafylloy E, McLean S. Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2020;50:102220. • Saleh MSM, Rehab NI, Sharaf MAF. Effect of deep cervical flexors training on neck proprioception, pain, muscle strength and dizziness in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Rehabil. 2018;5(1):14. • Fatima I, Ashraf A, Khalid K. Effectiveness of thoracic manipulation versus scapular stabilization exercises on pain and functional disability in cervical spondylosis. Journal of Nursing and Allied Health. 2024;2(01). • Ashfaq R, Riaz H. Effect of Pressure biofeedback training on deep cervical flexors endurance in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021;37(2):550. • Modarresi S, et al. A systematic review and synthesis of psychometric properties of the numeric pain rating scale and the visual analog scale for use in people with neck pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2022;38(2):132-148.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 3 months after the start.

Of 53 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Spondylosis, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 42. This study's planned 3 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 58 studies reached it within 27 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 47.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 7, 2026
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
StartActual
Jun 3, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Sep 24, 2026
Last update
Sep 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Primary outcomes
3 time frame changed, 2 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameNeck Disability - Neck Disability Index (NDI)Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.
  • Time framePain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment
  • Time frameUniversal GoniometerBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.
  • DescriptionPain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionUniversal Goniometer: how it is measured was reworded
Sep 28, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 time frame changed, 1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameThe Neck Flexor Endurance TestBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatment → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment
  • DescriptionThe Neck Flexor Endurance Test: how it is measured was reworded
Sep 28, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 28, 2026
    Primary outcomes 3 time frame changed, 2 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameNeck Disability - Neck Disability Index (NDI)Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.
    • Time framePain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment
    • Time frameUniversal GoniometerBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatment. → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment.
    • DescriptionPain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS): how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionUniversal Goniometer: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 time frame changed, 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameThe Neck Flexor Endurance TestBaseline and after 4 weeks of treatment → Baseline and 4 weeks of treatment
    • DescriptionThe Neck Flexor Endurance Test: how it is measured was reworded
    + 2 other changes: description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07814833
Lead sponsor
Ibadat International University, Islamabad
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 3, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 24, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 28, 2026

Study contacts

Aqsa Anwar
Contact
aqsaanwer.pt@gmail.com
0321-5172551

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion