CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07814833Updated Sep 11, 2026

Effectiveness of Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training With and Without Scapular Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Neck Disability in Cervical Spondylosis

An interventional study of Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training and Scapular Stabilization Exercises in Cervical Spondylosis, sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-11.

Sponsored by Ibadat International University, Islamabad · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the effectiveness of pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training with and without scapular stabilization exercises in patients with cervical spondylosis. The study will compare the effects of the two treatment approaches on pain intensity, cervical range of motion and neck disability.

Read the detailed description

Participants with radiologically confirmed cervical spondylosis will be recruited according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 44 participants will be recruited, with 22 participants allocated to each group after accounting for an anticipated 10% loss to follow-up.

Participants will be randomly allocated using the sealed envelope method into two groups. Group A will receive pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training combined with scapular stabilization exercises and standard physiotherapy. Group B will receive pressure biofeedback-assisted deep cervical flexor training without scapular stabilization exercises, along with standard physiotherapy.

Treatment will be provided three times per week for four weeks, with each session lasting approximately 30-40 minutes. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline and after completion of the four-week intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cervical Spondylosis

Browse trials for

03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Both genders aged 40-60 years.
  • Presence of chronic neck pain for ≥3 months with NPRS ≥3.
  • Radiologically confirmed cervical spondylosis, including cervical spine X-ray showing disc space narrowing and/or osteophyte formation.
  • Ability to perform active cervical and shoulder movements without neurological deficits.
  • Willingness to participate in the study and comply with the intervention protocol.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical spine surgery or trauma in the past 6 months.
  • Severe neurological involvement, including cervical myelopathy or severe radiculopathy with motor weakness, gait disturbance, or bowel/bladder involvement.
  • Inflammatory or systemic musculoskeletal disorders, e.g., rheumatoid arthritis or ankylosing spondylitis.
  • Current participation in structured neck/shoulder rehabilitation programs.
  • Uncontrolled medical conditions contraindicating exercise, e.g., uncontrolled hypertension or cardiovascular disease.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group A: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training + Scapular Stabilization Exerci

    Other: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training · Other: Scapular Stabilization Exercises · Other: Standard Physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Group B: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training + Standard Physiotherapy

    Other: Pressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training · Other: Standard Physiotherapy

Interventions

  • OtherPressure Biofeedback-Assisted Deep Cervical Flexor Training

    Deep cervical flexor training will be performed using a pressure biofeedback unit to facilitate selective activation and improve the strength and endurance of the deep cervical flexor muscles, particularly the longus colli and longus capitis. The participant will be positioned in supine lying with the hips and knees comfortably flexed, and the pressure biofeedback cuff will be placed beneath the cervical spine at approximately the C4-C5 level. The cuff will be inflated to a baseline pressure of 20 mmHg. The participant will be instructed to perform a gentle cranio-cervical flexion movement by slowly nodding the head and drawing the chin inward while maintaining contact of the head with the treatment surface. The pressure will be gradually increased to the prescribed target while avoiding head lifting, excessive cervical flexion, jaw clenching, shoulder elevation, or compensatory activation of the superficial cervical muscles. The target pressure will be 22 mmHg during the first week, 2

  • OtherScapular Stabilization Exercises

    Scapular stabilization exercises will be performed progressively to improve scapular control, postural alignment, and the strength and endurance of the scapular stabilizing muscles. During the first week, scapular retraction and depression exercises will be performed in sitting for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with a 5-second hold and 60 seconds rest between sets. During the second week, scapular retraction will be progressed using light TheraBand resistance for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with controlled movement and 60 seconds rest between sets. During the third week, wall slides and prone Y and T raises will be introduced and performed for 3 sets of 8-10 repetitions with controlled movement and 30-60 seconds rest between sets. During the fourth week, scapular stabilization exercises will be progressed with shoulder flexion and abduction while maintaining appropriate scapular control, performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 30-60 seconds rest between sets. All exercises will be performe

  • OtherStandard Physiotherapy

    Standard physiotherapy will include therapeutic exercises and postural management techniques aimed at reducing pain, improving cervical mobility, flexibility, and functional performance. Cervical range-of-motion exercises including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation will be performed within a pain-free range for 10 repetitions in each direction. Stretching exercises for the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, and pectoral muscles will be performed for 20-30 seconds for 3 repetitions. Cervical isometric strengthening exercises including flexion, extension, and lateral flexion will be performed with a 5-10-second hold for 10 repetitions. Postural education and ergonomic advice will also be provided, including instructions regarding proper sitting posture, appropriate head and neck positioning, and avoidance of prolonged static postures. Standard physiotherapy will be provided for approximately 10-15 minutes per session, three times weekly for four consecutive weeks.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neck Disability - Neck Disability Index (NDI)

    Measure: Functional disability related to neck pain measured using the Neck Disability Index.

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.

  2. Pain Intensity - Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Neck pain intensity measured using the 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

  3. Universal Goniometer

    Measure Cervical Range of Motion - Cervical flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion and right/left rotation

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Neck Flexor Endurance Test

    Measure cervical flexor muscle endurance

    Time frame: Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Hope Physiotherapy Clinic
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • • Tsiringakis G, Dimitriadis Z, Triantafylloy E, McLean S. Motor control training of deep neck flexors with pressure biofeedback improves pain and disability in patients with neck pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. 2020;50:102220. • Saleh MSM, Rehab NI, Sharaf MAF. Effect of deep cervical flexors training on neck proprioception, pain, muscle strength and dizziness in patients with cervical spondylosis: A randomized controlled trial. Phys Ther Rehabil. 2018;5(1):14. • Fatima I, Ashraf A, Khalid K. Effectiveness of thoracic manipulation versus scapular stabilization exercises on pain and functional disability in cervical spondylosis. Journal of Nursing and Allied Health. 2024;2(01). • Ashfaq R, Riaz H. Effect of Pressure biofeedback training on deep cervical flexors endurance in patients with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2021;37(2):550. • Modarresi S, et al. A systematic review and synthesis of psychometric properties of the numeric pain rating scale and the visual analog scale for use in people with neck pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain. 2022;38(2):132-148.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07814833
Lead sponsor
Ibadat International University, Islamabad
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 11, 2026
Start date
Jun 3, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 24, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 11, 2026

Study contacts

Aqsa Anwar
Contact
aqsaanwer.pt@gmail.com
0321-5172551

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion