ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07813702Updated Sep 10, 2026

URINARY INCONTINENCE AND GERIATRIC SYNDROMES

An observational study in Urinary Incontinence (UI), Urinary Incontinence and Urinary Incontinence in Old Age, sponsored by MERT UYSAL. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 65 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by MERT UYSAL · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
120
Ages
65 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this cross-sectional observational study is to examine the independent associations of urinary incontinence severity and post-void residual urine volume with frailty and other geriatric outcomes in older adults presenting to a urology outpatient clinic with urinary incontinence.

02

Conditions studied

  • Urinary Incontinence (UI)
  • Urinary Incontinence
  • Urinary Incontinence in Old Age
  • Urinary Incontinence in Geriatric Population
  • Geriatric Syndromes
  • Geriatric Syndrome
  • Frailty Syndrome
  • Frailty

Keywords

  • Urinary incontinence
  • Geriatric syndrome
  • Elderly individuals
  • Post-void residual urine volume
  • PVR
  • PHYSIOTHERAPY
  • Muscle strength
  • Physical parameters
  • Frailty
  • Sarcopenia
  • Physical performance
  • Falls
03

In context

Urinary Incontinence

983 studies on the registry are indexed under Urinary Incontinence; 180 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 120 is close to the median of 120 across 215 observational studies indexed under Urinary Incontinence.

Browse Urinary Incontinence studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with MERT UYSAL as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
65 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of women and men aged 65 years or older presenting to the Urology Outpatient Clinic of Karabuk Training and Research Hospital with urinary incontinence. Individuals who meet the eligibility criteria, are able to mobilize independently, and provide written informed consent will be enrolled consecutively during the study period. All participants will have experienced at least one urinary leakage episode during the previous four weeks and will have an ICIQ-UI SF score of ≥1. No healthy control group will be included.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 65 years or older,
  • Presence of involuntary urinary leakage according to the International Continence Society definition,
  • At least one urinary leakage episode during the previous four weeks and an ICIQ-UI SF score of ≥1,
  • General health status adequate to tolerate the outpatient assessment protocol,
  • Ability to mobilize independently,
  • Ability to understand instructions in Turkish and complete the study questionnaires,
  • Willingness to participate and provision of written .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute urinary tract infection or acute lower urinary tract symptoms,
  • History of major pelvic or orthopedic surgery within the previous six months,
  • Acute musculoskeletal condition that may affect performance during the assessments,
  • Neurological disease causing severe mobility limitations, including Parkinson's disease or stroke,
  • Diabetic neuropathy,
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease, including class III-IV heart failure or below 30% of the predicted value,
  • Dementia or severe cognitive impairment, defined as Global Deterioration Scale stage 4 or higher,
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment that may prevent completion of the assessments,
  • Terminal illness or active ,
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide ,
  • Unwillingness or inability to complete the assessment protocol.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
120 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Older Adults with Urinary Incontinence

    Adults aged 65 years or older with urinary incontinence, defined as at least one episode of urinary leakage during the previous four weeks and an ICIQ-UI SF score of ≥1, will be included. Participants will undergo a single-visit observational assessment of urinary incontinence severity and type, post-void residual urine volume, frailty, sarcopenia risk, cognitive function, physical performance, balance, falls, fear of falling, sleep, nutritional status, depressive symptoms, and quality of life. No intervention will be administered.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Frailty Level Assessed Using the FRAIL Scale

    The primary outcome is frailty level, assessed using the five-item FRAIL Scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater frailty. Participants will be classified as robust (0 points), prefrail (1-2 points), or frail (≥3 points). The primary exposures are urinary incontinence severity, assessed using the ICIQ-UI SF total score (range: 0-21), and post-void residual urine volume, recorded in milliliters as the mean of two consecutive bladder scanner measurements performed within 10 minutes after voiding. The independent associations of ICIQ-UI SF score and post-void residual urine volume with frailty level will be examined in the same multivariable regression model after adjustment for prespecified covariates.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (cross-sectional baseline assessment)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Performance Assessed Using the Short Physical Performance Battery

    Physical performance will be assessed using the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), comprising standing balance, usual-paced walking, and five-repetition chair-rise tests. Each component is scored from 0 to 4, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better physical performance. A total score of ≤8 will be considered indicative of low physical performance.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  2. Functional Mobility Assessed Using the Timed Up and Go Test

    Functional mobility will be assessed using the Timed Up and Go Test (TUG). Participants will stand up from a chair, walk three meters, turn, walk back to the chair, and sit down. Completion time will be recorded in seconds, with longer times indicating poorer functional mobility.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  3. Motor-Cognitive Mobility Assessed Using the Dual-Task Timed Up and Go Test

    Motor-cognitive mobility will be assessed using the Dual-Task Timed Up and Go Test (DT-TUG). Participants will complete the TUG while simultaneously performing serial subtraction by threes from 100. Completion time will be recorded in seconds, with longer times indicating poorer motor-cognitive mobility performance.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  4. Handgrip Strength Measured Using a Hand Dynamometer

    Handgrip strength will be measured in the dominant hand using a BASELINE hand dynamometer. Three trials will be performed, and the highest value, recorded in kilograms, will be used in the analysis. Values below 27 kg in men and below 16 kg in women will be classified as low muscle strength.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  5. Isometric Quadriceps Muscle Strength Measured Using a Hand-Held Dynamometer

    Isometric quadriceps muscle strength will be measured using a hand-held dynamometer (BASELINE) under a standardized testing protocol. Participants will perform two maximal voluntary isometric contractions with standardized verbal encouragement. The highest force value obtained from the two trials will be used in the analysis, with higher values indicating greater quadriceps muscle strength.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  6. Concern About Falling Assessed Using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International

    Concern about falling will be assessed using the 16-item Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I). Each item is scored from 1 to 4, producing a total score ranging from 16 to 64. Higher scores indicate greater concern about falling. Scores of 16-19, 20-27, and 28-64 will be classified as low, moderate, and high concern about falling, respectively.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  7. Sleep Quality Assessed Using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    Sleep quality will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which evaluates subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleep medication, and daytime dysfunction. The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality. A total score greater than 5 will be considered indicative of poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting sleep during the previous month.

Other outcomes

  1. Sarcopenia Risk Assessed Using the SARC-F

    Sarcopenia risk will be assessed using the five-item SARC-F questionnaire. Each item is scored from 0 to 2, resulting in a total score ranging from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater sarcopenia risk, and a total score of ≥4 will be considered indicative of sarcopenia risk.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  2. Appendicular Skeletal Muscle Mass Assessed Using Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis

    Appendicular skeletal muscle mass will be measured using a Tanita multi-frequency segmental body composition analyzer. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass will be recorded in kilograms, and the appendicular skeletal muscle mass index will be calculated as appendicular skeletal muscle mass divided by height squared (kg/m²). Values below 7.0 kg/m² in men and below 5.5 kg/m² in women will be considered indicative of low muscle mass.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  3. Calf Circumference

    Calf circumference will be measured using a non-elastic tape at the widest part of both calves. The highest measurement will be recorded in centimeters. Values below 34 cm in men and below 33 cm in women will be classified as low calf circumference.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  4. Nutritional Status Assessed Using the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form

    Nutritional status will be assessed using the six-item Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF). The total score ranges from 0 to 14. Participants will be classified as having normal nutritional status (12-14 points), being at risk of malnutrition (8-11 points), or having malnutrition (0-7 points).

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  5. Depressive Symptoms Assessed Using the Geriatric Depression Scale-5

    Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the five-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-5). The total score ranges from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptoms. Two or more depressive responses will be considered indicative of clinically relevant depressive symptoms.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  6. Cognitive Function Assessed Using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

    Global cognitive function will be assessed using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). The total score ranges from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better cognitive performance and lower scores indicating poorer cognitive function.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  7. Static Balance Assessed Using the Single-Leg Stance Test

    Static balance will be assessed using the Single-Leg Stance Test. Participants will stand unsupported on one leg, and the duration for which balance can be maintained will be recorded in seconds. The best result will be used in the analysis. Inability to maintain the position for at least five seconds will be reported as a clinical indicator of increased fall risk.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  8. Short Physical Performance Battery Component Scores

    The balance, four-meter walking, and five-repetition chair-rise components of the SPPB will be evaluated separately. Each component is scored from 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating better performance.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  9. Four-Meter Usual Gait Speed

    Participants will walk a marked four-meter course at their usual walking speed. Completion time will be recorded in seconds, and gait speed will be calculated in meters per second by dividing four meters by the completion time. A gait speed of ≤0.8 m/s will be classified as slow gait speed.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  10. Cognitive-Task Performance During the Dual-Task Timed Up and Go Test

    Cognitive-task performance during the DT-TUG will be evaluated by recording the number of errors made during serial subtraction by threes from 100. Whether the participant stops walking while performing the cognitive task and the number of walking stops will also be recorded.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  11. Occurrence of Falls During the Previous 12 Months

    Participants will be asked whether they experienced at least one fall during the previous 12 months. Fall occurrence will be recorded as a binary variable (yes/no).

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting the previous 12 months

  12. Number of Falls During the Previous 12 Months

    The self-reported total number of falls experienced by each participant during the previous 12 months will be recorded as a count variable.

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting the previous 12 months

  13. Recurrent Falls During the Previous 12 Months

    Recurrent falling will be defined as two or more self-reported falls during the previous 12 months and will be recorded as a binary variable (yes/no).

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting the previous 12 months

  14. Urinary Symptom-Related Quality of Life Assessed Using the ICIQ-LUTSqol

    The impact of urinary symptoms on quality of life will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Quality of Life (ICIQ-LUTSqol). The total score ranges from 19 to 76, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact of urinary symptoms on quality of life.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  15. Urinary Incontinence Subtype Assessed Using the 3 Incontinence Questions

    Urinary incontinence subtype will be determined using the 3 Incontinence Questions (3IQ). Based on the circumstances in which urinary leakage occurs most frequently, participants will be classified as having stress, urgency, mixed, or other urinary incontinence.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  16. Nocturia Frequency

    Nocturia will be assessed as the self-reported number of times per night that the participant wakes from the main sleep period to urinate. The average number of nocturia episodes per night during the previous four weeks will be recorded.

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting the previous four weeks

  17. Urinary Urgency

    Urinary urgency will be assessed as the presence of a sudden and compelling desire to urinate that is difficult to defer. Urgency presence and frequency during the previous four weeks will be recorded using brief symptom questions.

    Time frame: During the single study visit, reflecting the previous four weeks

  18. Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed Using the EQ-5D Index

    Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D, which evaluates mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression. Responses will be converted into an EQ-5D index value, with higher index values indicating better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

  19. Self-Rated Health Assessed Using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale

    Participants will rate their current overall health using the EQ Visual Analogue Scale. Scores range from 0, representing the worst imaginable health state, to 100, representing the best imaginable health state. Higher scores indicate better self-rated health.

    Time frame: During the single study visit (baseline assessment)

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared because the informed consent and ethics approval do not include external sharing or secondary use of individual-level health data. Only aggregated study results will be disseminated.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Nov 2026, 7 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 4, 2026
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
StartActual
Apr 8, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 2026
CompletionEst.
Nov 2026
Last update
Sep 10, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07813702
Lead sponsor
MERT UYSAL
Collaborators
Karabuk Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk University, Abant Izzet Baysal University
Responsible party
MERT UYSAL (Lecturer, Karabuk University) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Sep 10, 2026
Start date
Apr 8, 2026
Primary completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Mert Uysal, Lecturer
Contact
mertuysal@karabuk.edu.tr
0 (370) 418 8704
Eylem Tutun Yumin, Professor
study chair · Abant Izzet Baysal University
Meral Sertel, Professor
study director · Uludag University
Fahrettin Samil Uysal, Assistant Professor
study director · Karabuk University
Mert Uysal, Lecturer
principal investigator · Karabuk University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion