ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07811206PGB-ESPUpdated Sep 9, 2026

Comparison of Paragastric Nerve Block and Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain After Sleeve Gastrectomy

An interventional study of Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB) and ESPB in Obesity Postoperative Pain and Obesity Morbid Obesity Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Atlas University. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-09.

Primary conditionObesity, MorbidRegistry: ObesityReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Obesity — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Obesity, Morbid
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Obesity, Morbid, a narrower term within Obesity.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Atlas University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
72
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most commonly performed bariatric procedures for the treatment of obesity. Despite its minimally invasive nature, patients frequently experience moderate to severe postoperative pain, which may delay mobilization, prolong hospital stay, increase opioid consumption, and reduce patient satisfaction. Effective postoperative pain management is therefore an important component of perioperative care.

Regional analgesia techniques are increasingly used as part of multimodal analgesia protocols to reduce opioid requirements and opioid-related adverse effects. Paragastric nerve block (PGNB) has been reported to provide effective control of visceral pain, nausea, and vomiting after sleeve gastrectomy. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is another regional anesthesia technique that has demonstrated efficacy in reducing perioperative opioid consumption in bariatric surgery patients. However, no prospective randomized study has directly compared PGNB and ESPB in patients undergoing sleeve gastrectomy.

This prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial aims to compare the effects of PGNB, ESPB, and standard analgesia on postoperative pain management following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Seventy-two adult patients scheduled for elective sleeve gastrectomy will be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive PGNB, ESPB, or standard multimodal analgesia alone. The primary outcome will be postoperative pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes include postoperative opioid consumption, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, additional analgesic requirements, time to first analgesic request, postoperative nausea and vomiting, and block-related complications.

Read the detailed description

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is one of the most frequently performed bariatric surgical procedures for the treatment of morbid obesity. Although the procedure is minimally invasive, patients commonly experience moderate to severe postoperative pain during the early postoperative period. Inadequate pain control may delay mobilization, prolong hospital stay, increase pulmonary complications, reduce patient satisfaction, and increase opioid consumption, leading to opioid-related adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, sedation, and respiratory depression.

Regional anesthesia techniques have become an important component of multimodal analgesia protocols aimed at improving postoperative pain control while reducing opioid requirements. Paragastric nerve block (PGNB) is a surgeon-performed regional analgesic technique targeting visceral afferent nerve fibers surrounding the stomach. Previous studies have suggested that PGNB may reduce postoperative pain, opioid consumption, nausea, and vomiting following sleeve gastrectomy. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is an ultrasound-guided fascial plane block that has gained popularity in thoracoabdominal surgery because of its ease of application, favorable safety profile, and potential analgesic benefits. ESPB has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and improve postoperative analgesia in bariatric surgical patients.

Despite the growing use of both techniques, there is limited evidence directly comparing PGNB and ESPB in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy. Therefore, the optimal regional analgesic technique for this patient population remains uncertain.

The present study is designed as a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial conducted at Atlas University Faculty of Medicine Hospital. Following Institutional Review Board approval and written informed consent, 72 adult patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy will be enrolled. Eligible participants will be between 18 and 65 years of age, classified as ASA physical status II-III, and meet established bariatric surgery criteria.

Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three study groups:

  1. Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB) Group: Patients will receive intraoperative paragastric nerve block performed by the operating surgeon using 18 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine distributed across predefined paragastric anatomical regions.
  2. Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) Group: Patients will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided ESPB at the T6 vertebral level before surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine, with a maximum dose not exceeding 2 mg/kg.
  3. Control Group: Patients will receive standard perioperative multimodal analgesia without regional block intervention.

All participants will undergo standardized general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia protocols. Intraoperative remifentanil administration will be titrated according to routine clinical practice.

The primary outcome measure will be postoperative pain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.

Secondary outcome measures will include:

  • Total postoperative analgesic and opioid consumption during the first 24 hours.
  • Additional analgesic requirements.
  • Time to first analgesic request.
  • Intraoperative remifentanil consumption.
  • Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
  • Block-related adverse events and complications, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity, hematoma, or infection.

Postoperative assessments will be performed by investigators blinded to group allocation whenever feasible. Data will be collected during the intraoperative period, post-anesthesia care unit stay, and throughout the first 24 postoperative hours.

The findings of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness and safety of PGNB and ESPB for postoperative pain management following laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and may contribute to the optimization of perioperative analgesic strategies in bariatric surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity Postoperative Pain
  • Obesity Morbid Obesity Postoperative Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sleeve Gastrectomy, Bariatric Surgery, Paragastric Nerve Block, Erector Spinae Plane Block,Regional Anesthesia, Postoperative Analgesia, Multimodal Analgesia,
03

In context

Obesity, Morbid Reclassified

941 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity, Morbid; 163 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 72 is above the median of 62 across 602 interventional studies indexed under Obesity, Morbid.

Browse Obesity, Morbid studies →

Lead sponsor

Atlas University is the lead sponsor of 96 studies on the registry; 25 are open to participants now.

Compared within Obesity, Morbid, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Obesity. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: - Age between 18 and 65 years Scheduled for elective Sleeve Gastrectomy surgery Classified as II-III (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² with obesity-related comorbidities or BMI ≥40 kg/m² Willing to participate in the study and has provided written

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or to local anesthetic agents Allergy or to paracetamol or NSAIDs Coagulopathy or current anticoagulant therapy Infection or skin lesions at the site of block application Chronic pain syndrome Chronic opioid use, opioid dependence, or use of gabapentin/pregabalin Previous upper gastrointestinal surgery Moderate to severe renal impairment ( \<60 mL/min/1.73 m²) Moderate to severe liver disease ( B-C or active hepatic disease) Planned additional surgical procedures Inability to assess pain using VAS Refusal to participate in the study
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
72 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB)

    Participants will receive an intraoperative paragastric nerve block performed by the surgeon using 18 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine administered to predefined paragastric anatomical regions in addition to standard general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia.

    Procedure: Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB) · Procedure: ESPB · Procedure: Active Comparator

  • Experimental
    Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)

    Participants will receive bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block at the T6 vertebral level before surgery in addition to standard general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia.

    Procedure: Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB) · Procedure: ESPB · Procedure: Active Comparator

  • Active comparator
    No Intervention

    Participants will receive standard perioperative multimodal analgesia without regional anesthesia. Intravenous paracetamol and dexketoprofen will be administered according to the institutional analgesia protocol.

    Procedure: Paragastric Nerve Block (PGNB) · Procedure: ESPB · Procedure: Active Comparator

Interventions

  • ProcedureParagastric Nerve Block (PGNB)

    Ultrasound-guided paragastric nerve block performed intraoperatively for postoperative analgesia.

  • ProcedureESPB

    Bilateral ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block performed at the T6 vertebral level before surgery using 0.25% bupivacaine. The total dose will not exceed 2 mg/kg. The block is administered in addition to standard general anesthesia and multimodal analgesia.

  • ProcedureActive Comparator

    Patients receive standard perioperative multimodal analgesia without regional anesthesia techniques. Intravenous paracetamol (1 g) and dexketoprofen (50 mg) are administered intraoperatively according to institutional protocol.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome

    The primary outcome of this study is the assessment of postoperative pain levels. Pain intensity will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain) at the 1st, 6th, 12th, and 24th postoperative hours. The effectiveness of the analgesic techniques will be evaluated by comparing VAS scores between the groups.

    Time frame: Postoperative Hours 1, 6, 12, and 24

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ul Huda A, Alshahrani AS, Yasir M, Sawilah A, Alharthi AAN. Erector spinae block reduces intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized controlled trial. Qatar Med J. 2024 Dec 26;2024(4):58. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2024.58. eCollection 2024. PubMed 39944209 ↗
  • Katar MK, Turan UF. Efficacy and Safety of Paragastric Neural Blockade in Controlling Pain, Nausea, and Vomiting After Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2383-2390. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07255-9. Epub 2024 May 7. PubMed 38713336 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the dataset contains clinical information collected for the primary purpose of this single-center study. Data sharing is not planned due to institutional privacy policies and to protect participant confidentiality. Only aggregated study results will be published.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07811206
Lead sponsor
Atlas University
Responsible party
Ergun Gunduz (Assistant Professor, Atlas University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 9, 2026
Start date
Oct 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 15, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 9, 2026

Study contacts

Ergun Gunduz, M.D., Assistant Professor
Contact
ergun.gunduz@atlas.edu.tr
+905327448021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion